Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm

GHSA-27wq-qx3q-fxm9

HIGH

Improper Handling of Unexpected Data Type in ced

Also known asCVE-2021-39131
Published
Aug 23, 2021
Updated
Jul 8, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected

Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.

cednpm
6Kdownloads / week

Description

Impact

In ced v0.1.0, passing data types other than Buffer causes the Node.js process to crash.

Patches

The problem has been patched in ced v1.0.0. You can upgrade from v0.1.0 without any breaking changes.

Workarounds

Before passing an argument to ced, verify it’s a Buffer using Buffer.isBuffer(obj).

CVSS score

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/RL:O/RC:C

Base Score: 7.5 (High) Temporal Score: 7.2 (High)

Since ced is a library, the scoring is based on the “reasonable worst-case implementation scenario”, namely, accepting data from untrusted sources over a network and passing it directly to ced. Depending on your specific implementation, the vulnerability’s severity in your program may be different.

Proof of concept

const express = require("express");
const bodyParser = require("body-parser");
const ced = require("ced");

const app = express();

app.use(bodyParser.raw());

app.post("/", (req, res) => {
  const encoding = ced(req.body);

  res.end(encoding);
});

app.listen(3000);

curl --request POST --header "Content-Type: text/plain" --data foo http://localhost:3000 crashes the server.

References

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmcedall versions1.0.0
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ced. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update ced to 1.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-27wq-qx3q-fxm9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-27wq-qx3q-fxm9 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-27wq-qx3q-fxm9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact In ced v0.1.0, passing data types other than `Buffer` causes the Node.js process to crash. ### Patches The problem has been patched in [ced v1.0.0](https://github.com/sonicdoe/ced/releases/tag/v1.0.0). You can upgrade from v0.1.0 without any breaking changes. ### Workarounds Before passing an argument to ced, verify it’s a `Buffer` using [`Buffer.isBuffer(obj)`](https://nodejs.org/api/buffer.html#buffer_static_method_buffer_isbuffer_obj). ### CVSS score [CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/RL:O/RC:C](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/U
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-27wq-qx3q-fxm9 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-27wq-qx3q-fxm9 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.