CVE-2026-77301 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-789 vulnerability in adm-zip. A fix is available for adm-zip — see the affected versions and patch details below.
adm-zip: Uncontrolled memory allocation via the declared uncompressed size (DoS)
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-77301.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
adm-zipnpmDescription
Summary
adm-zip allocates an entry's output buffer from the declared uncompressed size (central-directory size field) before validating it against the actual data. A tiny crafted ZIP that declares a huge uncompressed size forces a multi-gigabyte allocation from a few bytes.
Impact
On adm-zip 0.5.17 (latest), Node 24, a 105-byte ZIP with one stored entry declaring size = 1,774,399,200 makes new AdmZip(buf).getEntries()[0].getData() commit ~1.8 GB of resident memory in ~4.4 s before throwing Error: ADM-ZIP: CRC32 checksum failed, roughly 16 million times the input size. Because the buffer is committed before any validation, on a memory-constrained host (containers, serverless, small VMs) the allocation OOM-kills the process before the CRC check (uncatchable), and concurrent requests can exhaust memory even on larger hosts. Any service that reads entries from untrusted ZIPs is exposed to a remote denial of service.
Steps to reproduce
Attachments are not supported in the advisory form, so the 105-byte PoC (sha256 980d34356fbb248fe527b9d0ac3eabc5c99393a374014be6199523de16709386) is inlined as base64 in this self-contained reproducer:
const AdmZip = require('adm-zip');
// 105-byte crafted ZIP, base64-inlined
// sha256 980d34356fbb248fe527b9d0ac3eabc5c99393a374014be6199523de16709386
const b64 = "UEsDBBQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABQAAAAUAAAABAAAAYWhlbGxvUEsBAhQAFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFAAAA4C7DaQEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGFQSwUGAAAAAAEAAQAvAAAAJAAAAAAA";
const buf = Buffer.from(b64, "base64"); // 105 bytes
const zip = new AdmZip(buf);
zip.getEntries()[0].getData(); // commits ~1.8 GB, then throws "ADM-ZIP: CRC32 checksum failed"
The single entry declares uncompressed size = 1,774,399,200 with a compressed size of 5. getData() allocates the full declared size before the CRC check runs, so the memory is committed regardless of the (tiny) actual payload.
Root cause
zipEntry.js does Buffer.alloc(<declared uncompressed size>) before checking the declared size against the compressed size / available bytes.
Suggested fix
Validate the declared uncompressed size against the compressed size and a configurable maximum before allocating (yauzl, for example, requires the caller to bound this); reject or stream when the declared size is implausible relative to the input. Happy to send a patch.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | adm-zip | all versions | 0.6.1npm install adm-zip@0.6.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for adm-zip, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update adm-zip to 0.6.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-77301 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Red Hat rates the impact of this vulnerability as Moderate because successful exploitation requires an application to ingest an untrusted archive and results solely in a denial of service through memory exhaustion, without compromising confidentiality or integrity. Within Red Hat environments, adm-zip is embedded as…
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-77301 (CC BY 4.0)
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.2 | ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:1792523640 | RHSA-2026:86675 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4 | rhoai/odh-dashboard-rhel9:1793001801 | RHSA-2026:92510 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-77301 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.