CVE-2026-107808 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Improper Authentication vulnerability in github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI. A fix is available for github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Nginx UI: Authentication bypass: password login does not enforce a passkey-only second factor (2FA bypass)
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-107808.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-107808 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UIReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
nginx-ui supports two second-factor methods — TOTP (OTP) and WebAuthn passkeys —
and reports an account as 2FA-enabled when either is configured. However, the
password login endpoint (POST /api/login) only enforces a second factor when a
TOTP secret is present. An account that has registered a passkey but no
TOTP is logged in after password verification alone — the passkey is never
requested. This silently downgrades a passkey-protected account to single-factor
(password-only) authentication.
Details
The account's 2FA policy treats passkeys as a valid factor (model/user.go):
func (u *User) EnabledOTP() bool { return len(u.OTPSecret) != 0 }
func (u *User) EnabledPasskey() bool { /* true if a passkey row exists */ }
func (u *User) Enabled2FA() bool { return u.EnabledOTP() || u.EnabledPasskey() }
func (u *User) AfterFind(_ *gorm.DB) error {
u.EnabledTwoFA = u.Enabled2FA() // exposed to the UI as `enabled_2fa`
return nil
}
But the login handler only checks EnabledOTP() (api/user/auth.go, Login):
u, err := user.Login(json.Name, json.Password)
...
if u.EnabledOTP() { // <-- only TOTP is enforced
if json.OTP == "" && json.RecoveryCode == "" {
c.JSON(http.StatusOK, LoginResponse{Message: "The user has enabled 2FA", Code: Enabled2FA}) // 199
user.BanIP(clientIP)
return
}
if _, err = user.VerifyOTP(u, json.OTP, json.RecoveryCode); err != nil { /* ... */ }
secureSessionID = user.SetSecureSessionID(u.ID)
}
// Passkey-only accounts fall through to here and receive a full session token:
accessToken, err := user.GenerateJWT(u)
No branch requires a WebAuthn assertion during password login when
EnabledPasskey() is true. The root cause is the mismatch between the
policy definition (Enabled2FA() = OTP or passkey) and the
enforcement check (EnabledOTP() only).
The same EnabledOTP()-only gating in RequireSecureSession()
(internal/middleware/secure_session.go) means passkey-only users are also
exempted from step-up on sensitive actions.
Proof of Concept
Tested against nginx-ui built from source (go build -tags unembed) on
127.0.0.1:9000, with WebAuthn configured and a victim account that has a
registered passkey and no TOTP. The vulnerable code is identical on the
production main branch (api/user/auth.go Login gates on u.EnabledOTP()
only; verified at commit 6c86e5a, 2026-05-17).
Account state advertised by GET /api/2fa_status:
{"enabled":true,"otp_status":false,"passkey_status":true, ...}
Attacker logs in with password only (POST /api/login, encrypted params as
the client normally sends):
HTTP 200
{"message":"ok","code":200,"token":"eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9...."}
code: 200 + a valid JWT = an authenticated session, with the passkey never
used. For comparison, the identical account with a TOTP secret instead correctly
returns the second-factor challenge:
HTTP 200
{"message":"The user has enabled 2FA","code":199}
| Account state | POST /api/login (password only) |
|---|---|
| Passkey registered, no TOTP | code 200 + JWT — 2FA NOT enforced |
| TOTP registered | code 199 — 2FA challenge enforced |
This isolates the defect: the login path enforces OTP but ignores passkeys.
Impact
- Any account protected only by a passkey is reduced to password-only authentication. An attacker who obtains the password (phishing, reuse, leak) gains full access despite the registered security key.
- In nginx-ui all authenticated users are effectively administrators and the terminal feature grants a host shell, so account takeover leads to full control of the managed nginx instance / host.
- Users are given a false sense of security: the UI shows the account as 2FA-enabled while the second factor is not enforced at login.
Remediation
- Gate the second-factor decision on
u.Enabled2FA()(notu.EnabledOTP()) inLogin, in both SSO callbacks, and inRequireSecureSession(). - For a passkey-only user logging in with a password, return a
"passkey assertion required" challenge and complete login only after a
successful WebAuthn assertion (the
begin_passkey_login/finish_passkey_loginflow already exists and should be required as the second step). - Centralize session-token issuance so no login entry point can skip the 2FA decision.
Affected components
api/user/auth.go—Loginmodel/user.go—EnabledOTP,EnabledPasskey,Enabled2FA,AfterFindapi/user/2fa.go—get2FAStatusinternal/middleware/secure_session.go—RequireSecureSession
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI | ≥ 1.9.10-0.20250517140552-daee3ac7ade1&&< 1.9.10-0.20260728074558-95cd21b70814 | 1.9.10-0.20260728074558-95cd21b70814go get github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI@v1.9.10-0.20260728074558-95cd21b70814 |
Affected Products
nginx uinginxuiDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI to 1.9.10-0.20260728074558-95cd21b70814 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-107808 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-107808 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.