CVE-2026-67324 — gitpython
Fix: gitpython-developers/GitPython#2162CVE-2026-67324 is a OS Command Injection vulnerability in gitpython. A fix is available for gitpython — see the affected versions and patch details below.
GitPython 3.1.50 Authentication Bypass via Joined Short Options
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-67324.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
gitpythonReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
GitPython version 3.1.50 blocks unsafe git clone options such as --upload-pack, -u, --config, and -c unless callers explicitly pass allow_unsafe_options=True. However, the default unsafe-option gate does not recognize joined short-option forms such as -u/path/to/helper.
Git itself accepts -u<upload-pack> as the short form of --upload-pack=<upload-pack>. As a result, Repo.clone_from(..., multi_options=["-u<helper>"], allow_unsafe_options=False) can execute the helper command even though the equivalent long option is blocked.
Affected package:
- Ecosystem: PyPI
- Package:
GitPython - Confirmed affected version:
3.1.50 - Repository:
gitpython-developers/GitPython - Current PyPI version during triage:
3.1.50
Relevant behavior:
Repo.unsafe_git_clone_optionscorrectly lists--upload-pack,-u,--config, and-cas unsafe clone options.Repo._clone()splitsmulti_optionswithshlex.split(" ".join(multi_options))and then callsGit.check_unsafe_options(...)._canonicalize_option_name("-u/path/to/helper")returns a string beginning withu..., not the canonical short optionu, so it does not match the blocked-uentry.- Git accepts the same joined short option as
--upload-pack=<helper>and executes the helper during clone.
Preconditions:
An application must pass attacker-influenced clone options into Repo.clone_from(..., multi_options=...) while relying on GitPython's default unsafe-option gate to block command-executing options.
The local PoC uses only a local bare Git repository and a local helper script. It does not contact any third-party service.
Local reproduction:
The PoC creates a disposable bare Git repository, a helper script, and a sentinel file path. It first confirms that the long --upload-pack=<helper> form is blocked by GitPython. It then calls Repo.clone_from(..., multi_options=["-u<helper>"], allow_unsafe_options=False).
Observed sanitized output:
gitpython_version=3.1.50
git_version=git version 2.53.0.windows.1
tmp_dir=<tmp>
long_upload_pack_gate=BLOCKED:UnsafeOptionError
joined_short_upload_pack_gate=ALLOWED
clone_result=EXPECTED_EXCEPTION:GitCommandError
sentinel_exists=True
sentinel_text=GITPYTHON_UNSAFE_OPTION_BYPASS
The clone fails because the helper exits nonzero, but the sentinel file proves that Git executed the helper despite allow_unsafe_options=False.
Impact:
An attacker who controls multi_options can bypass GitPython's default allow_unsafe_options=False protection and execute a local command via Git's --upload-pack / -u clone option. This is a residual bypass of an explicit GitPython security boundary, not merely a case where a caller opted into unsafe behavior.
Duplicate / related advisory checks:
- OSV query for
PyPI/GitPythonversion3.1.50returned no vulnerabilities. - The repository's public advisories include related unsafe Git option issues, including
GHSA-x2qx-6953-8485/CVE-2026-42284andGHSA-rpm5-65cw-6hj4/CVE-2026-42215. Their public affected ranges are marked as fixed before 3.1.50. GHSA-x2qx-6953-8485describes validatingmulti_optionsbeforeshlex.split(...). GitPython 3.1.50 now validates after splitting, but the joined short option-u<value>still bypasses because the validator canonicalizes it tou<value>rather thanu.GHSA-rpm5-65cw-6hj4describes unsafe underscored kwargs such asupload_pack=.... The current PoC usesmulti_options=["-u<helper>"]against 3.1.50 and does not depend on underscored kwargs.- GitHub issue search for
upload-pack unsafe optionsfound historical related items, including CVE-2022-24439 and the earlier unsafe-options gate work, but no public issue describing this current joined-short-option residual bypass in 3.1.50. - GitHub issue search for
multi_options unsafefound PR #2130, which fixed splitting ofmulti_optionsbefore checking. The current issue remains after that split because-u<value>is treated as option nameu<value>, not blocked short optionu. - GitHub issue searches for
u<upload-pack> unsafeand-cfooreturned no results.
Suggested remediation:
When checking unsafe Git options, parse joined short options that take values. For clone, -uVALUE and -cKEY=VALUE should be canonicalized to u and c respectively before comparing against the unsafe option set.
A safer approach is to maintain command-specific metadata for unsafe short options and recognize the bare option, split form, joined form, and long --option=<value> / --option <value> forms.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | gitpython | ≥ 3.1.50&&< 3.1.51 | 3.1.51pip install --upgrade 'gitpython==3.1.51' |
Affected Products
gitpythongitpython_projectDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gitpython, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update gitpython to 3.1.51 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-67324 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This vulnerability is rated as Important because exploitation requires an application to invoke `Repo.clone_from()` with attacker-controlled `multi_options` while `allow_unsafe_options=False` is set. This precondition means an attacker must already have some influence over a Git-related workflow within the consuming…
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-67324 (CC BY 4.0)
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 | python3.12-gitpython-0:3.1.59-1.el8ap | RHSA-2026:59135 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9 | python3.12-gitpython-0:3.1.59-1.el9ap | RHSA-2026:59136 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25 | rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9:1788315638 | RHSA-2026:65126 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-67324 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.