Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

CVE-2026-55447 — langflow

CRITICALFix: langflow-ai/langflow#12945

CVE-2026-55447 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.6) CWE-61 vulnerability in langflow. A fix is available for langflow — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Langflow: BaseFileComponent-based nodes arbitrary file read with RCE exploit

Also known asGHSA-ccv6-r384-xp75PYSEC-2026-378
Published
Jun 23, 2026
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 27, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-55447.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs50th percentile — riskier than 50% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-55447 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍langflow

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

All components based on BaseFileComponent are vulnerable to the following vulnerability:

  1. Docling (DoclingInlineComponent)
  2. Docling Serve (DoclingRemoteComponent)
  3. Read File (FileComponent)
  4. NVIDIA Retriever Extraction (NvidiaIngestComponent)
  5. Video File (VideoFileComponent)
  6. Unstructured API (UnstructuredComponent)

For clarity, from now on I'll only refer to Read File component.

The Read File node processes user-controlled files. Example scenario is a RAG chatbot - a system that allows users of an organization to ask questions about documents saved in the organizations.

By controlling a files that are digested into the RAG, an attacker can direct the node to read any file on the file-system by absolute path.

Using this vulnerability an attacker can acheive RCE:

  1. Upload a file that directs the node to read Langflow's secret_key file containing the JWT token secret.
  2. This would allow the attacker then to simply task the Chatbot for the JWT secret.
  3. Using this secret, the attacker then crafts a JWT token for any user-id, bypassing authentication.
  4. Code execution is then trivial - simply create a new flow with "Python Interpreter" node, fill it with arbitrary Python code and execute it.

Tested on commit 2d67402b1dbaefcbce85a244d4a6cd5e4bda1cfe

Details

The vulnerability is in: langflow/src/lfx/src/lfx/base/data/base_file.py Specifically in _unpack_bundle. This function extracts tar files, which can contain a symlink. This symlink can point to any file in the filesystem. Then, in self.process_files(), the file pointed by the symlink will be parsed and saved into the RAG. This can be done with unlimited number of symlinks in the same tar which can also be useful in some scenarios.

Suggestd fix - iterate over the files and make sure all are regular files or directories.

PoC

Reproduction:

  1. Create a flow with Read File (or any other affected components), and connect its output to some storage such as Chroma DB.
  2. Create a symlink pointing to any file. For the above exploit, point the symlink to langflow's JWT token file.
  3. Compress this symlink with tar.
  4. Upload it to the Read File component.
  5. Check the database, or ask a Chatbot connected to this vector database for the contents of the file.

Concrete PoC:

  • Flow with RAG ingestion and a Chatbot around it: Vector Store RAG.json
  • Exploit tar: archive.tar.txt (remove .txt, GitHub blocked .tar)
  • Create a file /tmp/trip.docx with any contents in it
  • Ingest the file in the flow above, and ask the Chatbot a question about this file.

A demo showing the attack: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/af00f700-f13f-4eac-848e-8afd11fb9297 In the demo the attacker steals Langflow secret key used to sign JWTs. The second stage of the attack, not shown in the demo, is using this key to sign a JWT token and executing Python code on the server using the Python code interpreter node.

Impact

Any Langflow user using any of the above mentioned components to ingest user-controlled data is affected. Depending on exact scenario, the user can also be exposed to an RCE risk.

Patches

Fixed in 1.9.2 via PR #12945. BaseFileComponent._unpack_bundle now rejects symlink and hardlink members (and any non-regular entries) during TAR extraction, with additional defensive symlink filtering during directory recursion and after extraction. Upgrade to 1.9.2 or later.

Ori Lahav Security Researcher @ Rubrik Inc.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIlangflowall versions1.9.2pip install --upgrade 'langflow==1.9.2'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
langflowlangflow
< 1.9.2
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langflow, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update langflow to 1.9.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-55447 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Assume what was exposed is already known: rotate any credential, token or key that the affected component could return, restrict the endpoint to callers that genuinely need it, and strip sensitive fields from responses and error output at the boundary rather than relying on the client not to read them.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary All components based on `BaseFileComponent` are vulnerable to the following vulnerability: 1. Docling (`DoclingInlineComponent`) 2. Docling Serve (`DoclingRemoteComponent`) 3. Read File (`FileComponent`) 4. NVIDIA Retriever Extraction (`NvidiaIngestComponent`) 5. Video File (`VideoFileComponent`) 6. Unstructured API (`UnstructuredComponent`) For clarity, from now on I'll only refer to Read File component. The Read File node processes user-controlled files. Example scenario is a RAG chatbot - a system that allows users of an organization to ask questions about documents saved in t
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-55447 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.