CVE-2026-54764 — traefik
Fix: traefik/traefik@7ae92d8CVE-2026-54764 is a CWE-345 vulnerability in github.com/traefik/traefik/v2. A fix is available for github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
ForwardAuth middleware leaks X-Forwarded-Port spoofing via untrusted X-Forwarded-Proto when trustForwardHeader=false
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-54764.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/traefik/traefik/v2🐹github.com/traefik/traefik/v3🐹github.com/traefik/traefik/v3🐹github.com/traefik/traefikReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
There is a medium severity vulnerability in Traefik's ForwardAuth middleware. Even when configured with trustForwardHeader: false, Traefik derives the X-Forwarded-Port header sent to the authentication service from the original incoming request instead of the sanitized forwarded request. As a result, an unauthenticated remote attacker can inject an X-Forwarded-Proto: https header over a plain HTTP connection and cause Traefik to forward X-Forwarded-Port: 443 to the auth service, bypassing port-based authorization checks. This is a regression of the incomplete fix for GHSA-6384-m2mw-rf54, which addressed the X-Forwarded-Proto and X-Forwarded-Prefix spoofing vectors but missed the X-Forwarded-Port vector.
Patches
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.51
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.22
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.6
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please open an issue.
<details> <summary>Original Description</summary>Summary
The ForwardAuth middleware, even when configured with trustForwardHeader: false,
still derives the X-Forwarded-Port header sent to the authentication service by
reading the attacker-controlled X-Forwarded-Proto header from the original
incoming request. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause Traefik
to forward X-Forwarded-Port: 443 to the auth service on a plain HTTP connection,
creating an inconsistency that can bypass port-based authorization checks.
Details
The fix introduced in commit 5e1de2258 (released as part of the April 2026 security
advisory GHSA-6384-m2mw-rf54) correctly strips all X-Forwarded-* headers from the
forwarded auth request when trustForwardHeader=false, and reconstructs
X-Forwarded-Proto from the actual TLS state of the connection (req.TLS).
However, the reconstruction of X-Forwarded-Port is delegated to the helper
forwardedPort(req) which receives the original request (req) rather than
the sanitized forward request (forwardReq):
// pkg/middlewares/auth/forward.go – writeHeader()
if !trustForwardHeader {
forwardedheaders.DeleteXForwardedHeaders(forwardReq.Header) // strips all X-Fwd-* from forwardReq
}
// ...
if _, ok := forwardReq.Header[forwardedheaders.XForwardedPort]; !ok {
forwardReq.Header.Set(forwardedheaders.XForwardedPort, forwardedPort(req)) // ← req = ORIGINAL
}
// pkg/middlewares/auth/forward.go – forwardedPort()
func forwardedPort(req *http.Request) string {
if _, port, err := net.SplitHostPort(req.Host); err == nil && port != "" {
return port
}
// Reads attacker-controlled header on the ORIGINAL request:
if req.Header.Get(forwardedheaders.XForwardedProto) == "https" || ... {
return "443"
}
if req.TLS != nil {
return "443"
}
return "80"
}
Result when trustForwardHeader=false and attacker sends X-Forwarded-Proto: https
on a plain HTTP connection:
┌──────────────────────────────────┬──────────┬────────┐
│ Header forwarded to auth service │ Expected │ Actual │
├──────────────────────────────────┼──────────┼────────┤
│ X-Forwarded-Proto │ http │ http ✓ │
├──────────────────────────────────┼──────────┼────────┤
│ X-Forwarded-Port │ 80 │ 443 ✗ │
└──────────────────────────────────┴──────────┴────────┘
The inconsistency between Proto=http and Port=443 is exploitable against any authentication service that gates access based on X-Forwarded-Port.
PoC
Traefik configuration:
middlewares:
my-auth:
forwardAuth:
address: "http://auth-service/"
trustForwardHeader: false # security setting, but still bypassable
routers:
api:
rule: "PathPrefix(`/api`)"
middlewares:
- my-auth
service: backend
Auth service logic (example victim):
# auth-service checks: only port 443 requests are considered "secure"
port = request.headers.get("X-Forwarded-Port", "80")
proto = request.headers.get("X-Forwarded-Proto", "http")
if port == "443":
return 200 # grant access
return 403
Attack:
Plain HTTP connection, no TLS – but spoofs port 443 curl -H "X-Forwarded-Proto: https" http://traefik.example.com/api/admin Auth service receives X-Forwarded-Port: 443 → grants access
Verification: Enable Traefik debug logging and observe X-Forwarded-Port: 443 in the auth request while the connection is plain HTTP.
Impact
Any deployment using the ForwardAuth middleware with trustForwardHeader: false where the downstream authentication service uses X-Forwarded-Port to make authorization decisions is vulnerable to privilege escalation. An unauthenticated attacker can bypass port-based security checks (e.g., "only allow requests arriving on HTTPS port 443") by injecting a single X-Forwarded-Proto: https header on a plain HTTP connection.
This is a regression of the incomplete fix for GHSA-6384-m2mw-rf54: while the X-Forwarded-Prefix and X-Forwarded-Proto spoofing vectors were addressed, the X-Forwarded-Port vector was missed.
</details>Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 | all versions | 2.11.51go get github.com/traefik/traefik/v2@v2.11.51 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 | all versions | 3.6.22go get github.com/traefik/traefik/v3@v3.6.22 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 | ≥ 3.7.0&&< 3.7.6 | 3.7.6go get github.com/traefik/traefik/v3@v3.7.6 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/traefik/traefik | all versions | No fix |
Affected Products
traefiktraefikDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/traefik/traefik/v2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/traefik/traefik/v2 to 2.11.51 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-54764 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Close the privilege gap rather than the entry point: audit which accounts, roles and service identities can reach the affected operation, drop the component to the least privilege it actually needs, and review file and directory permissions created by earlier installs — a default left in place is what makes this reachable.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-54764 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.