CVE-2026-54550 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.4) Path Traversal vulnerability in org.codehaus.izpack:izpack-installer. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.
IzPack: Path Traversal in UnpackerBase allows writing files outside the installation directory via malicious pack entries
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-54550.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-54550 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 385,738 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
org.codehaus.izpack:izpack-installerReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
IzPack's UnpackerBase.unpack() resolves pack-file target paths without any
canonical-path or directory-containment check. An attacker who distributes a
trojanized installer JAR (the format is unsigned) can include pack entries whose
targetPath contains ../ sequences. When a victim runs the installer the
file is written to an attacker-chosen location on disk under the victim's
privileges — including startup folders, PATH directories, or system locations.
Details
Vulnerable method: com.izforge.izpack.installer.unpacker.UnpackerBase.unpack()
Source file: izpack-installer/src/main/java/com/izforge/izpack/installer/unpacker/UnpackerBase.java
Vulnerable lines (5.2.4): ~618–627
The relevant code path is:
String targetPath = packFile.getTargetPath(); // attacker-controlled
String path = IoHelper.translatePath(targetPath, variables); // separator swap ONLY
File target = new File(path); // no canonical check
// ... mkdirs() then file is written to `target`
IoHelper.translatePath() (source: izpack-util/.../IoHelper.java) performs
only file-separator character conversion ('/' ↔ File.separatorChar) and
contains no security validation whatsoever. There is no call to
getCanonicalPath(), no startsWith(installDir) containment check, and no
normalisation of .. segments.
Because IzPack installer JARs carry no digital signature, an attacker can
repack any legitimate installer with malicious PackFile entries. The file
format is a standard ZIP with serialised resources — no integrity protection.
Confirmed unpatched in HEAD (fetched from GitHub, 2025):
git show HEAD:izpack-installer/src/main/java/com/izforge/izpack/installer/unpacker/UnpackerBase.java \
| grep -n 'getCanonicalPath\|startsWith.*install\|traversal'
# (no output — fix not present)
PoC
# 1. Clone IzPack source and view the vulnerable code directly
git clone --depth=1 --branch izpack-5.2.4 https://github.com/izpack/izpack.git
sed -n '615,650p' izpack/izpack-installer/src/main/java/com/izforge/izpack/installer/unpacker/UnpackerBase.java
# 2. Compile and run the following Java reproducer (no IzPack classpath needed):
// TestPathTraversal.java
import java.io.*;
public class TestPathTraversal {
// Exact replication of IoHelper.translatePath() — separator swap, no security
static String translatePath(String destination) {
return destination.replace('/', File.separatorChar);
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
String installDir = "/tmp/izpack_install";
String maliciousPath = installDir + "/../../../tmp/ESCAPED_FILE";
// This is what UnpackerBase does:
String path = translatePath(maliciousPath);
File target = new File(path); // resolves traversal
target.getParentFile().mkdirs();
try (FileWriter fw = new FileWriter(target)) {
fw.write("Written outside install dir via IzPack path traversal\n");
}
System.out.println("File written to: " + target.getCanonicalPath());
System.out.println("Inside installDir: " +
target.getCanonicalPath().startsWith(new File(installDir).getCanonicalPath()));
}
}
javac TestPathTraversal.java && java TestPathTraversal
# Output: File written to: /tmp/ESCAPED_FILE
# Inside installDir: false
Impact
Any user who runs an IzPack-generated installer is affected. The attacker only
needs to distribute a repackaged installer — a common social-engineering vector.
On Windows (the primary IzPack platform) the victim typically runs the installer
as a local administrator, so the attacker can write to %APPDATA%\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Startup,
%SystemRoot%\System32, or any other location reachable by the victim user.
On Linux/macOS the same applies for user-writable locations.
No authentication, no special privileges and no interaction beyond running the installer are required on the victim side.
Credits
This issue was identified by Michał Majchrowicz, Marcin Wyczechowski, and Paweł Zdunek, members of the AFINE Team.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | org.codehaus.izpack:izpack-installer | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.codehaus.izpack:izpack-installer, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Remediation status
No patched version of org.codehaus.izpack:izpack-installer has shipped for CVE-2026-54550 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-54550 in your dependencies?
Find it across Maven, including transitive dependencies.