CVE-2026-49440 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.4) CWE-325 vulnerability in deno. A fix is available for deno — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Deno: Miller-Rabin Primality Test Allows Zero Rounds
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-49440.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-49440 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
denoReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
node:crypto.checkPrime(candidate[, options][, callback]) and crypto.checkPrimeSync(candidate[, options]) ran no Miller-Rabin rounds at all when the caller left options.checks at its default of 0. In that mode, the only test applied to the candidate was trial division by the primes up to 17,863. Any composite whose smallest prime factor exceeds that bound — for example the product of two primes just above it, such as 17,881 × 17,891 — was reported as true ("probably prime").
The same divergence affected the lower-level op_node_check_prime / op_node_check_prime_bytes paths that the polyfill calls into.
Node.js itself does not have this problem: it forwards checks = 0 to OpenSSL's BN_check_prime, which substitutes a sensible default number of rounds based on the candidate's bit length (per FIPS 186-4 Appendix C.3 Table C.1). Deno's Rust implementation had no equivalent fallback, so count = 0 meant "skip the loop entirely."
Affected APIs
crypto.checkPrime(candidate)(callback form, default options)crypto.checkPrime(candidate, { checks: 0 }, callback)crypto.checkPrimeSync(candidate)(default options)crypto.checkPrimeSync(candidate, { checks: 0 })
Callers who explicitly passed checks >= 1 were less affected, the loop ran the number of rounds they asked for, but were still receiving fewer rounds than Node would have applied for the same bit length. With the patched version they get at least the FIPS minimum.
Not affected
- Deno's prime generation (
crypto.generatePrime,crypto.generatePrimeSync, and the DH parameter generation path). Those routes go throughPrime::generate_with_optionsinext/node_crypto/primes.rs, which hardcodes20Miller-Rabin rounds and never reads a user-controlledchecksvalue, so the bug never reached them. - Any other Deno-internal use of primality testing —
is_probably_primeis not called from elsewhere in the runtime withcount = 0. - Web Crypto (
crypto.subtle.*), which uses entirely separate code paths and does not expose a primality test.
Impact
The realistic exposure is application-level: a Deno program that calls crypto.checkPrime (or its sync variant) with default options to validate an externally-supplied bignum, for example checking a peer-provided Diffie-Hellman prime, validating a prime read from configuration, or sanity-checking an RSA factor, will accept crafted composites as prime. The composite is trivial to construct: any product of two primes greater than 17,863 works.
Downstream consequences depend on what the program does with the "verified" prime. If the prime is fed into a key exchange, signature verification, or factorization-style check, the security guarantees of that protocol collapse to whatever the attacker engineered into the composite.
The CVSS impact is bounded by the requirement that the victim application both (a) calls checkPrime with default options and (b) acts on the result for security-relevant input it does not control.
Reproduction
import { checkPrimeSync } from "node:crypto";
// 17881 and 17891 are both prime and both above the trial-division
// ceiling used by Deno's implementation.
const composite = 17881n * 17891n;
// Affected versions print `true`; the patched version prints `false`.
console.log(checkPrimeSync(composite));
The same result is reproducible from Rust against the internal helper:
use num_bigint::BigInt;
let composite = BigInt::from(17881u32) * BigInt::from(17891u32);
assert!(!is_probably_prime(&composite, 0)); // fails on affected versions
Fix
PR #34391 introduces a
helper min_miller_rabin_rounds_for_bits(bits) that returns the FIPS
186-4 Appendix C.3 round counts, matching the defaults OpenSSL uses
inside BN_check_prime. is_probably_prime then clamps the loop bound
to count.max(min_miller_rabin_rounds_for_bits(n.bits())). The
probabilistic loop now always executes, regardless of what checks
value the caller supplied, with a round count strong enough to keep the
false-positive probability below 2^-80. Callers that pass a larger
explicit checks still get exactly that many rounds.
Unit tests under ext/node_crypto/primes.rs cover the
17,881 × 17,891 case, a larger 64-bit composite, and the FIPS lookup
table itself.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade immediately:
- Pass an explicit
checksvalue when callingcrypto.checkPrimeorcrypto.checkPrimeSync. A value of64is conservative for any reasonable bit length and keeps the loop running. - Do not rely on
crypto.checkPrimeto validate attacker-influenced bignums in security-critical paths until you are on the patched release.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | deno | all versions | 2.8.1cargo update -p deno --precise 2.8.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for deno, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update deno to 2.8.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-49440 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-49440 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-49440. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-49440 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-49440 across crates.io dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.