CVE-2026-49411 — deno
MEDIUMCVE-2026-49411 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) CWE-284 vulnerability in deno. A fix is available for deno — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Deno Node TCPWrap numeric hostname aliases bypass --deny-net resolved-IP deny checks
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-49411.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-49411 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 396,966 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
denoReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Deno's network permission model is designed so that --deny-net rules apply to the resolved IP address of a destination, not just the literal string supplied by the caller. That means --deny-net=127.0.0.1 (or --deny-net=127.0.0.0/8) is expected to block any attempt to reach loopback, regardless of how the hostname is spelled.
On affected versions, the Node.js compatibility TCP path checked the permission against the original hostname string before resolution and then did not re-check after resolution. A caller could therefore pass a numeric alias of an IP address (for example the decimal integer 2130706433 or the hex form 0x7f000001, both of which resolve to 127.0.0.1) and reach the denied destination through node:net.connect or node:http.request's { host, port } options form.
The native Deno.connect(), fetch(), and URL-string variants of node:http.request("http://...") were not affected, because they either re-checked permissions after resolution or normalized the hostname through the URL parser before checking.
Proof of concept
Run on Deno 2.7.14, with a local TCP listener on 127.0.0.1:<PORT>:
import net from "node:net";
// --allow-net + --deny-net=127.0.0.0/8
// (or even --deny-net=127.0.0.1:<PORT>)
net.connect({ host: "2130706433", port: PORT }); // CONNECTED ❌
net.connect({ host: "0x7f000001", port: PORT }); // CONNECTED ❌
net.connect({ host: "127.0.0.1", port: PORT }); // denied ✅
The same primitive reached the loopback HTTP listener through node:http when the destination was passed as options rather than as a URL string:
import http from "node:http";
// options-form host — bypasses the deny rule on affected versions
http.request({ hostname: "2130706433", port: PORT, path: "/" }).end();
// URL-string form — correctly denied (URL parser normalizes the host)
http.request(`http://2130706433:${PORT}/`).end();
The server-side log showed the bypassed requests arriving from 127.0.0.1 with the numeric alias preserved in the Host header.
Impact
A program that intentionally allows broad outbound network access but uses --deny-net to carve out protected destinations, typically loopback, private/internal ranges, or cloud-instance metadata IPs, could be made to reach those denied destinations from less-trusted code (a dependency, plugin, or attacker-controlled input) that funnels through node:net.connect({ host }) or node:http.request({ hostname }).
The CVSS vector reflects this as a local-attack-vector, permissions-required confidentiality impact: the attacker needs to be able to run code inside the Deno process, and the demonstrated primitive is "reach an explicitly denied IP." It does not by itself exfiltrate data or execute code; the further impact depends on what the now-reachable endpoint exposes.
The confirmed scope is IPv4 numeric hostname aliases reaching a denied resolved IP through the Node TCPWrap / options-host path. URL strings, node:http2, undici, and IPv6 numeric/mapped-address variants were not exhaustively tested by the reporter.
Not affected
- Programs that do not use
--deny-netat all (the bug is specifically about deny rules being bypassed; allow rules were always checked against the original string). - Native Deno networking APIs (
Deno.connect,Deno.connectTls,fetch, ...), these already re-checked permissions after resolution as of PR #33203. - URL-string callers such as
fetch("http://2130706433/")ornode:http.request("http://2130706433/"), the URL parser normalized the hostname to its dotted-quad form before the permission check ran. - Calls that do not provide
host/hostname(e.g. connecting by IP literal or by a name that the deny rule already matches verbatim).
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade immediately, reduce exposure by:
- Preferring an
--allow-netallowlist over a--deny-netdenylist. An allowlist denies numeric aliases by default because they don't match the listed hostnames; only the destinations you've explicitly permitted can be reached. - Validating untrusted host input before passing it to
node:net.connect/node:http.request. Reject hostnames that are purely decimal integers (/^\d+$/) or begin with0x, as these are the alias forms exploited by the bypass. - Avoiding the Node options-host path for sensitive calls in favour of URL-string forms, which are normalized by the URL parser before the permission check.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | deno | all versions | 2.8.0cargo update -p deno --precise 2.8.0 |
Affected Products
denodenoDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for deno, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update deno to 2.8.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-49411 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-49411 in your dependencies?
Find it across crates.io, including transitive dependencies.