CVE-2026-48034 — @hulumi/policies
Fix: kerberosmansour/hulumi#175CVE-2026-48034 is a CWE-284 vulnerability in @hulumi/policies. A fix is available for @hulumi/policies — see the affected versions and patch details below.
HULUMI-H5 bypass via decoy sibling resources targeting a different bucket
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-48034.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
@hulumi/policiesnpmDescription
Affected: @hulumi/policies < 1.4.0 — Fixed in: 1.4.0 — Severity: High — CWE-284 (Improper Access Control)
Summary
HULUMI-H1 forbids raw aws:s3:Bucket outside of Hulumi's SecureBucket component, with one exemption: a raw bucket that's a child of a SecureBucket is allowed because the component is responsible for the hardening. HULUMI-H5 is the defence-in-depth check that closes the H1 exemption — for any raw bucket claiming it, H5 verifies the five hardening sibling resources a real SecureBucket always emits (public-access block, SSE-KMS, ownership controls, versioning, TLS-only bucket policy) are actually present.
The bug: H5 only checked the siblings' types. It never verified that those siblings actually applied to the bucket being exempted. A consumer (or compromised PR) could pair an unhardened raw bucket with five hardening sibling resources whose bucket property pointed at a completely different bucket, and H5 would report no violation while the actual bucket shipped with zero hardened defaults.
Impact
Consumers using HulumiHardeningPack could ship a raw S3 bucket with no public-access block, no SSE-KMS, no ownership controls, no versioning, and no TLS-only bucket policy — while the policy pack reported the stack as compliant.
Patches
Upgrade to @hulumi/[email protected]. The H5 sibling check now requires both (a) the sibling to share the same parent SecureBucket instance via the anchored URN helper from GHSA-2, AND (b) the sibling's bucket property — or, for the bucket policy, its Resource ARN list — to reference the exempted bucket explicitly. Five decoy siblings pointing at a different bucket no longer count.
Workarounds
None — the exemption itself is the mechanism, so the value-binding check is the only fix.
Resources
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @hulumi/policies | all versions | 1.4.0npm install @hulumi/policies@1.4.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @hulumi/policies, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update @hulumi/policies to 1.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-48034 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-48034 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.