Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-47184 — zeroconf

MEDIUMFix: python-zeroconf/python-zeroconf@0ad3f37

CVE-2026-47184 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) CWE-770 vulnerability in zeroconf. A fix is available for zeroconf — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Zeroconf: Unbounded DNS record cache allows LAN-local memory exhaustion via multicast flood

Also known asGHSA-rfg2-pjw2-56x2PYSEC-2026-3439
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-47184.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs31th percentile — riskier than 31% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.30%0.59%0.89%0.4%0.4%0.4%Sep 26Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-47184 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 385,386 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍zeroconf

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

DNSCache._async_add inserted every response record into cache, _expirations, _expire_heap, and service_cache with no cap on entry count. The only pre-existing protection was a PTR TTL floor (_DNS_PTR_MIN_TTL = 1125 s, RFC 6762 §10), which actually prolonged attacker-injected records, and a periodic async_expire on _CACHE_CLEANUP_INTERVAL = 10 s that could not keep up with a flood.

Any unauthenticated host on the local link (UDP/5353, 224.0.0.251 / ff02::fb) can multicast valid mDNS responses with unique names (RFC 6762 §11 allows up to 253 bytes each) and watch them accumulate. On memory-constrained deployments (Home Assistant on Raspberry-Pi-class hardware is the canonical victim) sustained traffic OOM-kills the process; under lighter load, every cache lookup and every periodic expiry pass grows linearly slower, starving asyncio and breaking unrelated zeroconf consumers (discovery, registration, ServiceBrowser callbacks). A second variant — re-multicasting cached records with shifting TTLs — grows _expire_heap unbounded between cleanup runs without touching cache or _total_records.

Patches

Fixed in zeroconf 0.149.6 (PR #1718). Upgrade to >= 0.149.6.

Workarounds

There is no in-process workaround; upgrading is the fix. Otherwise, restrict mDNS (UDP/5353) to trusted Layer-2 segments via AP client isolation, guest-network separation, or host firewall rules.

Resources

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIzeroconfall versions0.149.7pip install --upgrade 'zeroconf==0.149.7'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
zeroconfpaulsm
< 0.149.7
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for zeroconf, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update zeroconf to 0.149.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-47184 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate

Zeroconf is a pure Python implementation of multicast DNS (mDNS) service discovery. Prior to 0.149.7, every mDNS response record is inserted into the internal cache and expiration structures with no cap, so an attacker can multicast a stream of responses with unique names to exhaust memory and degrade cache…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Upgrade to zeroconf 0.149.7 or later once packaged in the affected Red Hat product. Where upgrading isn't immediately possible, restricting the affected host's exposure to the local network segment (network segmentation or firewalling multicast DNS traffic on UDP/5353) reduces the practical attack surface, since exploitation requires local-link access.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-47184 (CC BY 4.0)

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact `DNSCache._async_add` inserted every response record into `cache`, `_expirations`, `_expire_heap`, and `service_cache` with no cap on entry count. The only pre-existing protection was a PTR TTL floor (`_DNS_PTR_MIN_TTL = 1125` s, RFC 6762 §10), which actually *prolonged* attacker-injected records, and a periodic `async_expire` on `_CACHE_CLEANUP_INTERVAL = 10` s that could not keep up with a flood. Any unauthenticated host on the local link (UDP/5353, `224.0.0.251` / `ff02::fb`) can multicast valid mDNS responses with unique names (RFC 6762 §11 allows up to 253 bytes each) and wat
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-47184 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-47184: zeroconf — Fixed in 0.149.7