CVE-2026-44393 — oslo-messaging
HIGHCVE-2026-44393 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.4) CWE-297 vulnerability in oslo-messaging. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.
OpenStack oslo.messaging does not verify RabbitMQ broker hostname during TLS handshake
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-44393.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-44393 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
oslo-messagingReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
An issue was discovered in OpenStack oslo.messaging 1.0.0 through 17.3.0. The oslo.messaging RabbitMQ driver does not perform TLS hostname verification when connecting to the message broker. When ssl_ca_file is configured, the driver enables certificate chain validation but does not pass the expected broker hostname into the underlying TLS stack. Any certificate signed by the deployment CA is accepted regardless of hostname, allowing an attacker who can intercept control-plane traffic to impersonate the RabbitMQ broker and perform a man-in-the-middle attack on RPC and notification traffic. All OpenStack services using oslo.messaging with RabbitMQ over TLS are affected.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | oslo-messaging | ≥ 1.0.0 | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for oslo-messaging, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Remediation status
No patched version of oslo-messaging has shipped for CVE-2026-44393 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This Important flaw in OpenStack oslo.messaging impacts Red Hat OpenStack Platform and OpenShift Container Platform when using RabbitMQ with TLS. The vulnerability arises from the RabbitMQ driver's failure to perform proper hostname verification during TLS connection establishment. This oversight enables an attacker…
To mitigate the risk of man-in-the-middle attacks, restrict network access to the RabbitMQ message broker. Configure firewall rules to permit inbound connections to the RabbitMQ port (typically 5672 or 5671 for AMQPS) only from authorized hosts and services within the control plane. This operational measure reduces the exposure to attackers attempting to intercept and impersonate the broker.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-44393 (CC BY 4.0)
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2 | python-oslo-messaging-0:10.2.4-2.20260710155333.82281a0.el8ost | RHSA-2026:54757 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-44393 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.