CVE-2026-39391 — ci4ms
MEDIUMCVE-2026-39391 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.8) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. A fix is available for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms — see the affected versions and patch details below.
CI4MS has Stored XSS via Unescaped Blacklist Note in Admin User List
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-39391.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
ci4-cms-erp/ci4msReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The blacklist (ban) note parameter in UserController::ajax_blackList_post() is stored in the database without sanitization and rendered into an HTML data-note attribute without escaping. An admin with blacklist privileges can inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the browser of any other admin who views the user management page.
Details
In modules/Users/Controllers/UserController.php, the ajax_blackList_post() method (line 344-362) accepts a note POST parameter with only a required validation rule:
// Line 347 — validation only checks 'required', no sanitization
$valData = (['note' => ['label' => lang('Backend.notes'), 'rules' => 'required'],
'uid' => ['label' => 'uid', 'rules' => 'required|is_natural_no_zero']]);
// Line 352 — raw user input passed directly to ban()
$user->ban($this->request->getPost('note'));
Shield's Bannable::ban() trait stores the message as-is:
// vendor/codeigniter4/shield/src/Traits/Bannable.php
public function ban(?string $message = null): self
{
$this->status = 'banned';
$this->status_message = $message; // No escaping
// ...
}
In the users() method (line 13-91), when building the DataTables response, the status_message is concatenated directly into HTML without escaping:
// Line 55 — esc() IS used here (correct)
$result->fullname = esc($result->firstname) . ' ' . esc($result->surname);
// Line 58-59 — NO esc() on status_message (vulnerable)
if ($result->status == 'banned'):
$result->actions .= '<button ... data-note="' . $result->status_message . '">'
The HTML string is returned as JSON (line 90) and DataTables renders it into the DOM. CSP is disabled ($CSPEnabled = false in App.php), and no SecureHeaders filter is applied.
PoC
Step 1 — Store XSS payload via ban endpoint:
curl -X POST 'https://TARGET/backend/users/blackList' \
-H 'X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest' \
-H 'Cookie: ci_session=ADMIN_SESSION_WITH_UPDATE_PERM' \
-d 'uid=2¬e=%22+onmouseover%3D%22alert(document.cookie)%22+x%3D%22'
Expected response: {"result":true,"error":{"type":"success","message":"..."}}
Step 2 — Trigger payload:
Any admin navigating to /backend/users will receive HTML containing:
<button ... data-note="" onmouseover="alert(document.cookie)" x="">
The XSS fires when the admin hovers over the blacklist button for the banned user.
Alternative immediate-execution payload:
note="><img src=x onerror=alert(document.cookie)>
Impact
- Session hijacking: An attacker with blacklist privileges can steal session cookies of other admins (including superadmins who view the user list but are themselves protected from being banned).
- Privilege escalation: A lower-privileged admin could use stolen superadmin sessions to gain full control.
- Persistent: The payload persists in the database and fires every time the user list is loaded, affecting all admins who view the page.
Recommended Fix
Wrap status_message with esc() to match the escaping already applied to other user fields on line 55:
// In users() method, line 58-59 — change:
$result->actions .= '<button type="button" class="btn btn-outline-dark btn-sm open-blacklist-modal"
data-id="' . $result->id . '" data-status="' . $result->status . '" data-note="' . esc($result->status_message) . '"><i
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms | all versions | 0.31.4.0composer require ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms:^0.31.4.0 |
Affected Products
ci4msci4-cms-erpDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms to 0.31.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-39391 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-39391 in your dependencies?
Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.