NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-34572 — ci4ms

HIGH

CVE-2026-34572 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) CWE-284 vulnerability in ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. A fix is available for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms — see the affected versions and patch details below.

CI4MS: Account Deactivation Module Full Persistent Unauthorized Access for All‑Roles via Improper Session Invalidation (Logic Flaw)

Also known asGHSA-8fq3-c5w3-pj3q
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-34572.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs44th percentile — riskier than 44% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.38%0.77%1.15%0.1%0.5%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Vulnerability: Improper Session Invalidation on Account Deactivation (Broken Access Control / Logic Flaw)

  • This vulnerability is caused by a backend logic flaw that maintains a false trust assumption that already-authenticated users remain trustworthy, even after their accounts are explicitly deactivated. As a result, administrative security actions do not behave as intended, allowing persistent unauthorized access.

Description

The application fails to immediately revoke active user sessions when an account is deactivated. Due to a logic flaw in the backend design, account state changes are enforced only during authentication (login), not for already-established sessions.

The system implicitly assumes that authenticated users remain trusted for the lifetime of their session. There is no session expiration or account expiration mechanism in place, causing deactivated accounts to retain indefinite access until the user manually logs out. This behavior breaks the intended access control policy and results in persistent unauthorized access, representing a critical security flaw.

Affected Functionality

  • User session management and authentication logic
  • Account deactivation mechanism
  • All authenticated endpoints, including administrative and content interfaces

Attack Scenario

  • A user logs into the application.
  • An administrator deactivates the user account.
  • The user remains fully logged in and can continue performing all actions allowed by their role indefinitely, as there is no session expiration.
  • The user can continue invoking backend methods, triggering application actions, accessing sensitive interfaces (including user management if permitted), and interacting with the system as if the account were still active.
  • Access is only lost if the user manually logs out, which may never occur.

Impact

  • Unauthorized Continued Access: Deactivated users retain full access indefinitely, violating intended access control and expected security behavior.
  • Bypass of Administrative Controls: Administrative actions (deactivation) fail to immediately restrict active sessions.
  • Logic Flaw Resulting in Broken Behavior: Backend authorization logic relies on a flawed trust assumption that authenticated users remain valid, enforcing account state only at login.
  • Full Functional Access Retained: Deactivated users can continue invoking application methods, executing actions, interacting with protected endpoints, and using the system exactly as before being deactivated.
  • Privilege Abuse: Users with elevated roles (moderator, editor, administrator) can continue performing privileged actions after account deactivation, including accessing user management interfaces and modifying application state.
  • Service Disruption Potential: Persistent access allows attackers to disrupt services, manipulate content, or interfere with normal application operations.
  • Attack Persistence: Attackers can maintain access indefinitely, increasing the risk of data exfiltration, unauthorized modifications, or further privilege escalation.
  • False Sense of Remediation: Administrators may believe a threat has been mitigated while the deactivated user remains active within the system.

Endpoint Example: Any endpoint accessible to authenticated users, including dashboards, administrative interfaces, user management pages, and API endpoints.

Steps To Reproduce (PoC)

  1. Create or use an existing user account.
  2. Log into the application using this account.
  3. From an administrative account, deactivate the logged-in user account.
  4. Observe that the target user remains authenticated.
  5. Verify that the user can still access protected functionality, invoke actions, and interact with the application as before.
  6. Confirm that the user only loses access after manually logging out (if they choose to do so).

Remediation

  • Immediately invalidate all active sessions when an account is deactivated.
  • Enforce account status checks on every authenticated request, not only during login.
  • Introduce proper session expiration or account expiration mechanisms to prevent indefinite access.
  • Correct the backend logic flaw to ensure access control behavior aligns with intended security design and does not rely on unsafe trust assumptions.

Ready Video POC:

https://mega.nz/file/zJkhwCII#G1-TecKmNBJmEeBS0ExsAY_RXEmAl3QqMqu4t5oy844

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistci4-cms-erp/ci4msall versions0.31.0.0composer require ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms:^0.31.0.0

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
ci4msci4-cms-erp
< 0.31.0.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms to 0.31.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-34572 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Close the privilege gap rather than the entry point: audit which accounts, roles and service identities can reach the affected operation, drop the component to the least privilege it actually needs, and review file and directory permissions created by earlier installs — a default left in place is what makes this reachable.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary ### Vulnerability: Improper Session Invalidation on Account Deactivation (Broken Access Control / Logic Flaw) - This vulnerability is caused by a backend logic flaw that maintains a false trust assumption that already-authenticated users remain trustworthy, even after their accounts are explicitly deactivated. As a result, administrative security actions do not behave as intended, allowing persistent unauthorized access. ### Description The application fails to immediately revoke active user sessions when an account is deactivated. Due to a logic flaw in the backend design, account
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-34572 in your dependencies?

Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-34572: ci4ms PrivEsc — Fixed in 0.31.0.0