NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

CVE-2026-34560 — ci4ms

CRITICAL

CVE-2026-34560 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.1) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. A fix is available for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms — see the affected versions and patch details below.

CI4MS: Logs Full Account Takeover for All-Roles & Privilege-Escalation via Stored DOM XSS

Also known asGHSA-r4v5-rwr2-q7r4
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 5, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-34560.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs33th percentile — riskier than 33% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.32%0.64%0.96%0.0%0.4%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Vulnerability: Stored DOM Blind XSS via Logs Interface Rendering (Administrative Context Execution)

  • Stored Cross-Site Scripting (Blind XSS) via Unsafe Rendering of User-Controlled Logged Data

Description

The application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding.

This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an administrator views the logs page.

For example, accessing /backend/backup/restore/xss-payload-here causes an error that gets logged by the application. If the injected portion contains an XSS payload, it is stored inside the logs without sanitization and later rendered unsafely inside the logs management interface.

When an administrator views the logs page, the stored payload executes automatically in the administrative browser context, leading to stored blind cross-site scripting (Blind XSS).

Affected Functionality

  • Application logging mechanism
  • Logs storage and retrieval logic
  • Logs rendering within administrative interface
  • Any endpoint that logs unsanitized user-controlled input

Attack Scenario

  • An attacker injects a malicious XSS payload into any user-controlled input that is logged by the application.
  • Example: Visit /backend/backup/restore/<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>
  • The application throws an error and logs the malicious payload.
  • The payload is stored within application logs.
  • An administrator views the logs interface.
  • The payload executes automatically in the administrator’s browser context.

Any method or endpoint that logs user-controlled input without sanitization will result in the same Blind XSS condition when viewed inside logs management.

Impact

  • Persistent Stored Blind XSS
  • Execution of arbitrary JavaScript in administrators’ browsers
  • Privilege escalation when viewed by administrators
  • Full administrator account takeover
  • Full compromise of the entire application

Endpoints:

  • /backend/logs/
  • /backend/backup/restore/{payload}
  • Any other endpoint that logs xss payloads there

Steps To Reproduce (POC)

  1. Trigger an endpoint that logs user-controlled input, such as: /backend/backup/restore/<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>
  2. Ensure the request generates an error and the payload is written into application logs
  3. Navigate to the logs interface as an administrator
  4. View the logged entry
  5. Notice the XSS payload executing automatically (Blind XSS)

Remediation

  • Avoid unsafe DOM manipulation methods: Do not use .html(), innerHTML, or similar sink functions in client-side JavaScript or server-side templating (e.g., PHP). Even when user input flowing into these sinks is not immediately apparent, they can introduce Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities that an attacker may exploit.

  • Apply output encoding: Implement HTML entity encoding on all user-controlled data before rendering it in the browser. This helps neutralize potentially malicious input.

  • Implement input sanitization: Ensure that all user-supplied input is properly sanitized before processing or output. Currently, no sanitization mechanisms are in place, which should be addressed as a priority.

  • Enforce security headers and cookie attributes:

    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Define and enforce a strict CSP to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts.
    • HttpOnly flag: Set the HttpOnly attribute on session cookies to prevent client-side script access.
    • SameSite attribute: Configure the SameSite cookie attribute to mitigate Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) risks.
    • Secure flag: Ensure all cookies are transmitted only over HTTPS by enabling the Secure attribute.

    These measures collectively reduce the impact of XSS and help prevent escalation paths such as CSRF via XSS.

Ready Video POC:

https://mega.nz/file/jRN3nDSR#wJCwyFhbeT-OYAwlaTD_7j6wc5wRgz1EGJL0bnuhHxY

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistci4-cms-erp/ci4msall versions0.31.0.0composer require ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms:^0.31.0.0

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
ci4msci4-cms-erp
< 0.31.0.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms to 0.31.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-34560 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary ### **Vulnerability: Stored DOM Blind XSS via Logs Interface Rendering (Administrative Context Execution)** - Stored Cross-Site Scripting (Blind XSS) via Unsafe Rendering of User-Controlled Logged Data ### Description The application renders user-controlled input unsafely within the logs interface. If any stored XSS payload exists within logged data, it is rendered without proper output encoding. This issue becomes a Blind XSS scenario because the attacker does not see immediate execution. Instead, the payload is stored within application logs and only executes later when an admin
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-34560 in your dependencies?

Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-34560: ci4ms XSS — Fixed in 0.31.0.0