CVE-2026-33186 — grpc
CRITICALCVE-2026-33186 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.1) CWE-285 vulnerability in google.golang.org/grpc. A fix is available for google.golang.org/grpc — see the affected versions and patch details below.
gRPC-Go has an authorization bypass via missing leading slash in :path
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-33186.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-33186 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
google.golang.org/grpcReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 :path pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the :path omitted the mandatory leading slash (e.g., Service/Method instead of /Service/Method). While the server successfully routed these requests to the correct handler, authorization interceptors (including the official grpc/authz package) evaluated the raw, non-canonical path string. Consequently, "deny" rules defined using canonical paths (starting with /) failed to match the incoming request, allowing it to bypass the policy if a fallback "allow" rule was present. This affects gRPC-Go servers that use path-based authorization interceptors, such as the official RBAC implementation in google.golang.org/grpc/authz or custom interceptors relying on info.FullMethod or grpc.Method(ctx); AND that have a security policy contains specific "deny" rules for canonical paths but allows other requests by default (a fallback "allow" rule). The vulnerability is exploitable by an attacker who can send raw HTTP/2 frames with malformed :path headers directly to the gRPC server. The fix in version 1.79.3 ensures that any request with a :path that does not start with a leading slash is immediately rejected with a codes.Unimplemented error, preventing it from reaching authorization interceptors or handlers with a non-canonical path string. While upgrading is the most secure and recommended path, users can mitigate the vulnerability using one of the following methods: Use a validating interceptor (recommended mitigation); infrastructure-level normalization; and/or policy hardening.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | google.golang.org/grpc | all versions | 1.79.3go get google.golang.org/grpc@v1.79.3 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for google.golang.org/grpc, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update google.golang.org/grpc to 1.79.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-33186 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-33186 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-33186. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9 | cryostat/cryostat-grafana-dashboard-rhel9:4.2.0-9 | RHSA-2026:17789 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | opentelemetry-collector-0:0.144.0-2.el10_2 | RHSA-2026:19135 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | osbuild-composer-0:165.1-2.el10_2 | RHSA-2026:22450 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | image-builder-0:52.1-1.el10_2 | RHSA-2026:22937 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support | opentelemetry-collector-0:0.144.0-2.el10_0 | RHSA-2026:19719 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support | osbuild-composer-0:134.1-9.el10_0 | RHSA-2026:27856 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support | rhc-worker-script-0:0.11-1.el7_9 | RHSA-2026:54191 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | rhc-1:0.2.5-6.el8_10 | RHSA-2026:10107 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-33186 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-33186 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.