CVE-2026-31859 — craftcms/cms
Fix: craftcms/cms@cc9921cCVE-2026-31859 is a Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in craftcms/cms. A fix is available for craftcms/cms — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Craft has Reflective XSS via incomplete return URL sanitization
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-31859.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
craftcms/cms🐘craftcms/cmsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The fix for CVE-2025-35939 in craftcms/cms introduced a strip_tags() call in src/web/User.php to sanitize return URLs before they are stored in the session. However, strip_tags() only removes HTML tags (angle brackets) -- it does not inspect or filter URL schemes. Payloads like javascript:alert(document.cookie) contain no HTML tags and pass through strip_tags() completely unmodified, enabling reflected XSS when the return URL is rendered in an href attribute.
Details
The patched code in is:
public function setReturnUrl($url): void
{
parent::setReturnUrl(strip_tags($url));
}
strip_tags() removes HTML tags (e.g., <script>, <img>) from a string, but it is not a URL sanitizer. When the sanitized return URL is subsequently rendered in an href attribute context (e.g., <a href="{{ returnUrl }}">), the following dangerous payloads survive strip_tags() completely unmodified:
-
javascript:protocol URLs --javascript:alert(document.cookie)contains no HTML tags, sostrip_tags()returns it verbatim. When placed in anhref, clicking the link executes the JavaScript. -
data:URIs --data:text/html;base64,PHNjcmlwdD5hbGVydCgxKTwvc2NyaXB0Pg==uses Base64 encoding and contains no tags at all, bypassingstrip_tags()entirely. -
Protocol-relative URLs --
//evil.com/stealcontains no tags and is passed through unchanged. When rendered as anhref, the browser resolves it relative to the current page’s protocol, redirecting the user to an attacker-controlled domain.
The core issue is that strip_tags() operates on HTML syntax (angle brackets) while the threat model here requires URL scheme validation. These are fundamentally different security concerns.
Impact
Reflected XSS via crafted return URL. An attacker constructs a malicious link such as https://target.example.com/craft/?returnUrl=javascript:alert(document.cookie) and sends it to a victim. The attack flow is:
- Victim clicks the link, visiting the Craft CMS site.
- The application calls
setReturnUrl()with the attacker-controlled value. strip_tags()processes the URL but finds no HTML tags -- it passes through unchanged.- The URL is stored in the session and later rendered in an
hrefattribute (e.g., a "Return" or "Continue" link). - When the victim clicks that link,
javascript:alert(document.cookie)executes in the context of the Craft CMS origin.
This enables:
- Session hijacking via cookie theft (
document.cookie) - Data exfiltration via
fetch()to an attacker-controlled server - Phishing by redirecting to a lookalike domain (protocol-relative URL)
- CSRF by performing actions on behalf of the authenticated user
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | craftcms/cms | ≥ 4.15.3&&< 4.17.3 | 4.17.3composer require craftcms/cms:^4.17.3 |
| 🐘Packagist | craftcms/cms | ≥ 5.7.5&&< 5.9.7 | 5.9.7composer require craftcms/cms:^5.9.7 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for craftcms/cms, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update craftcms/cms to 4.17.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-31859 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-31859 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-31859. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-31859 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-31859 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.