NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2026-28396 — nocodb

Fix: nocodb/nocodb@dfbe836

CVE-2026-28396 is a CWE-613 vulnerability in nocodb. A fix is available for nocodb — see the affected versions and patch details below.

NocoDB: Refresh Tokens Not Revoked on Password Reset

Also known asGHSA-x4vh-j75g-268g
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-28396.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs11th percentile — riskier than 11% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.27%0.55%0.82%0.0%0.2%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

0other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
nocodbnpm
14Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

The password reset flow did not revoke existing refresh tokens, allowing an attacker with a previously stolen refresh token to continue minting valid JWTs after the victim resets their password.

Details

passwordReset() in users.service.ts updated token_version (invalidating JWTs) but did not call UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken(). The refreshToken() method only checked token existence, not token_version. Both passwordChange() and signOut() correctly deleted all refresh tokens.

Impact

An attacker who previously obtained a refresh token retains access after password reset until the token expires.

Credit

This issue was reported by @bugbunny-research (bugbunny.ai).

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmnocodball versions0.301.3npm install nocodb@0.301.3

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
nocodbnocodb
< 0.301.3
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nocodb, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update nocodb to 0.301.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-28396 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The password reset flow did not revoke existing refresh tokens, allowing an attacker with a previously stolen refresh token to continue minting valid JWTs after the victim resets their password. ### Details `passwordReset()` in `users.service.ts` updated `token_version` (invalidating JWTs) but did not call `UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken()`. The `refreshToken()` method only checked token existence, not `token_version`. Both `passwordChange()` and `signOut()` correctly deleted all refresh tokens. ### Impact An attacker who previously obtained a refresh token retains access af
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-28396 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-28396: nocodb — Fixed in 0.301.3