CVE-2026-26996 — minimatch
Fix: isaacs/minimatch@2e111f3CVE-2026-26996 is a CWE-1333 vulnerability in minimatch. A fix is available for minimatch — see the affected versions and patch details below.
minimatch has a ReDoS via repeated wildcards with non-matching literal in pattern
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-26996.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
minimatchnpmDescription
Summary
minimatch is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when a glob pattern contains many consecutive * wildcards followed by a literal character that doesn't appear in the test string. Each * compiles to a separate [^/]*? regex group, and when the match fails, V8's regex engine backtracks exponentially across all possible splits.
The time complexity is O(4^N) where N is the number of * characters. With N=15, a single minimatch() call takes ~2 seconds. With N=34, it hangs effectively forever.
Details
Give all details on the vulnerability. Pointing to the incriminated source code is very helpful for the maintainer.
PoC
When minimatch compiles a glob pattern, each * becomes [^/]*? in the generated regex. For a pattern like ***************X***:
/^(?!\.)[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?X[^/]*?[^/]*?[^/]*?$/
When the test string doesn't contain X, the regex engine must try every possible way to distribute the characters across all the [^/]*? groups before concluding no match exists. With N groups and M characters, this is O(C(N+M, N)) — exponential.
Impact
Any application that passes user-controlled strings to minimatch() as the pattern argument is vulnerable to DoS. This includes:
- File search/filter UIs that accept glob patterns
.gitignore-style filtering with user-defined rules- Build tools that accept glob configuration
- Any API that exposes glob matching to untrusted input
Thanks to @ljharb for back-porting the fix to legacy versions of minimatch.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | minimatch | ≥ 10.0.0&&< 10.2.1 | 10.2.1npm install minimatch@10.2.1 |
| 📦npm | minimatch | ≥ 9.0.0&&< 9.0.6 | 9.0.6npm install minimatch@9.0.6 |
| 📦npm | minimatch | ≥ 8.0.0&&< 8.0.5 | 8.0.5npm install minimatch@8.0.5 |
| 📦npm | minimatch | ≥ 7.0.0&&< 7.4.7 | 7.4.7npm install minimatch@7.4.7 |
| 📦npm | minimatch | ≥ 6.0.0&&< 6.2.1 | 6.2.1npm install minimatch@6.2.1 |
| 📦npm | minimatch | ≥ 5.0.0&&< 5.1.7 | 5.1.7npm install minimatch@5.1.7 |
Affected Products
minimatchminimatch_projectDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for minimatch, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update minimatch to 10.2.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-26996 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Exploitation of this flaw requires that a user or service processes untrusted input.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 | automation-gateway-0:2.5.20260422-3.el8ap | RHSA-2026:24761 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9 | automation-platform-ui-0:2.6.8-1.el9ap | RHSA-2026:13508 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | nodejs22-1:22.22.2-1.el10_1 | RHSA-2026:7080 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | nodejs24-1:24.14.1-2.el10_1 | RHSA-2026:7675 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support | nodejs22-1:22.22.2-2.el10_0 | RHSA-2026:7310 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | nodejs:22-8100020260331102257.6d880403 | RHSA-2026:7123 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | nodejs:24-8100020260408131901.6d880403 | RHSA-2026:7670 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | nodejs:20-8100020260414073138.489197e6 | RHSA-2026:8339 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-26996 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.