CVE-2026-26194 — gogs
Fix: gogs/gogs@a000f0cCVE-2026-26194 is a CWE-88 vulnerability in gogs.io/gogs. A fix is available for gogs.io/gogs — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Gogs: Release tag option injection in release deletion
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-26194.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
gogs.io/gogsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
There is a security issue in Gogs where deleting a release can fail if a user-controlled tag name is passed to Git without the right separator, allowing Git option injection and therefore interfering with the process.
Affected Component
- internal/database/release.go
process.ExecDir(..., "git", "tag", "-d", rel.TagName)
Details
rel.TagName is used as a CLI argument to git tag -d without -- or --end-of-options.
If the tag name begins with -, Git parses it as a flag.
The prior mitigation is incomplete. There is path sanitization in place during creation:
- internal/database/release.go
r.TagName = strings.TrimLeft(r.TagName, "-")
But it only covers one creation path and does not reliably protect tag deletions, such as tags added through git push or ref updates.
Exploit Conditions
- An attacker can add a tag name that starts with a dash into the repository.
- A user with permission to delete releases triggers it through the web UI or API.
Recommended Fix
- Add end-of-options in release deletion:
git tag -d -- <tagName>
- It is better to use the safe git-module deletion helper since it handles options properly.
- All Git commands should be audited for user input, ensuring that the end-of-options separator is always used.
Impact
- Option injection into
git tag -d - Tag/release deletion can fail or behave unexpectedly
- Operational denial of service in release cleanup workflows
- Potential release metadata inconsistency
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | gogs.io/gogs | all versions | 0.14.2go get gogs.io/gogs@v0.14.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gogs.io/gogs, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update gogs.io/gogs to 0.14.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-26194 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-26194 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-26194. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-26194 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-26194 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.