CVE-2026-24489 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-93 vulnerability in gakido. A fix is available for gakido — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Gakido vulnerable to HTTP Header Injection (CRLF Injection)
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-24489.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
gakidoReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
A vulnerability was discovered in Gakido that allowed HTTP Header Injection through CRLF (Carriage Return Line Feed) sequences in user-supplied header values and names.
When making HTTP requests with user-controlled header values containing \r\n (CRLF), \n (LF), or \x00 (null byte) characters, an attacker could inject arbitrary HTTP headers into the request.
Impact
An attacker who can control header values passed to Gakido's Client.get(), Client.post(), or other request methods could:
- Inject arbitrary HTTP headers - Add malicious headers to requests
- HTTP Response Splitting - Potentially manipulate responses in certain proxy configurations
- Cache Poisoning - Inject headers that could poison intermediate caches
- Session Fixation - Inject session-related headers
- Bypass Security Controls - Inject headers that bypass server-side security checks
Proof of Concept
from gakido import Client
# Before fix: X-Injected header would be sent as a separate header
c = Client(impersonate="chrome_120")
r = c.get("https://httpbin.org/headers", headers={
"User-Agent": "test\r\nX-Injected: pwned"
})
# The server would receive:
# User-Agent: test
# X-Injected: pwned
Affected Code
The vulnerability existed in the header processing logic where user-supplied headers were not sanitized before being sent in HTTP requests.
File: gakido/headers.py
Function: canonicalize_headers()
Fix
The fix adds a _sanitize_header() function that strips \r, \n, and \x00 characters from both header names and values before they are included in HTTP requests.
def _sanitize_header(name: str, value: str) -> tuple[str, str]:
"""
Sanitize header name and value to prevent HTTP header injection (CRLF injection).
Strips CR, LF, and null bytes from both name and value.
"""
clean_name = name.replace("\r", "").replace("\n", "").replace("\x00", "")
clean_value = value.replace("\r", "").replace("\n", "").replace("\x00", "")
return clean_name, clean_value
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | gakido | all versions | 0.1.1pip install --upgrade 'gakido==0.1.1' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gakido, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update gakido to 0.1.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-24489 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-24489 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.