CVE-2026-113730 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.6) CWE-693 vulnerability in ognl:ognl. A fix is available for ognl:ognl — see the affected versions and patch details below.
OGNL stricter-invocation block list bypass via java.lang.reflect reflection proxies
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-113730.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-113730 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
ognl:ognlReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
OGNL's optional stricter invocation mode maintains a block list that prevents expressions from directly calling methods on dangerous classes such as Runtime, ProcessBuilder, and ClassLoader. The block list filters on the declaring class of the method OGNL invokes. Because java.lang.reflect.Method (and Constructor/Field) are not on the list, an expression can use reflection as a proxy — someMethod.invoke(target, args) — to reach a blocked method. The real call (e.g. ProcessBuilder.start()) then executes inside the JDK reflection machinery and never passes back through OGNL's invokeMethod, so the block list never sees it.
Proof of concept
Under the default OGNL context (public-only access, stricter invocation enabled), the following expression creates a file even though a direct new ProcessBuilder(...).start() is blocked:
(#pb=new java.lang.ProcessBuilder({"/usr/bin/touch","rce-proof.txt"}),
#[email protected]@class.getMethods(),
#names=#methods.{ #this.getName() },
#startIdx=#names.indexOf("start"),
#methods[#startIdx].invoke(#pb, null))
Impact and scope — please read carefully
This is hardening of a defense-in-depth secondary layer, not a break of OGNL's primary security boundary.
In OGNL the stricter-invocation block list is a secondary mitigation. The primary access-control gate is the MemberAccess implementation supplied by the integrating framework or application, which OGNL consults on every constructor and method call. Frameworks that evaluate untrusted expressions are expected to install a restrictive MemberAccess — for example, Apache Struts' SecurityMemberAccess, which excludes dangerous classes and the java.lang.reflect package. Against such a MemberAccess this PoC is blocked at the very first step (the new ProcessBuilder(...) constructor), before reflection is ever reachable.
The default context that ships with OGNL intentionally allows all public members and is not designed to sandbox untrusted input. An application that evaluates attacker-controlled expressions with that permissive default already has many paths to code execution, and this technique is not required to achieve it.
You are affected only if all of the following hold: (1) your application evaluates untrusted/attacker-controlled OGNL expressions, (2) it uses OGNL's default permissive MemberAccess (or an equivalently permissive one that allows java.lang.reflect), and (3) it relies on the stricter-invocation block list as its sandbox. Properly configured consumers — including Apache Struts with its SecurityMemberAccess — are not affected. The actual protection for untrusted-expression scenarios remains a correctly configured MemberAccess; the block list should not be treated as a sandbox.
Fix
java.lang.reflect.Method, java.lang.reflect.Constructor, and java.lang.reflect.Field are added to the stricter-invocation block list, so reflection objects can no longer be used as invocation proxies in stricter mode. The java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle path was verified not to be exploitable (its signature-polymorphic invoke/invokeExact fail through OGNL's reflection-based invocation), so no additional classes are required.
Credit
Reported responsibly through Tidelift by 毛锐 ([email protected]).
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | ognl:ognl | all versions | 3.4.13ognl:ognl:3.4.13 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ognl:ognl, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update ognl:ognl to 3.4.13 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-113730 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-113730 in your dependencies?
Find it across Maven, including transitive dependencies.