CVE-2026-107851 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) CWE-524 vulnerability in contao/core-bundle. A fix is available for contao/core-bundle — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Contao: Improper access control in the table access voter
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-107851.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-107851 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
contao/core-bundleReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Due to a caching defect in the security voter that governs table-level access to Contao's Data Container (DCA) backend, a low-privileged, non-admin backend user can obtain unauthorized read, create, update, and delete access to database tables outside their assigned module permissions. This includes tables containing sensitive personal data, such as frontend member records and newsletter subscriber e-mail addresses.
Vulnerability Details
In plain terms: Contao's backend is organized into modules (e.g. "News", "Members"). Every backend user is assigned to a group, and that group decides which modules, and therefore which database tables, they are allowed to work with. Before Contao lets a user touch a table, it is supposed to check: "does this user's group actually include this table?"
To avoid doing that check over and over, Contao remembers the answer for the rest of the request. The problem is that it remembers the answer under the wrong label. Instead of remembering "is this user allowed to access table X", it only remembers "is this user allowed to access something", without recording which table the answer was actually about.
So if a request first checks a table the user IS allowed to see, and then checks a second, completely different table the user is NOT allowed to see, Contao reuses the first answer for the second table too. The user ends up with access to a table their group was never given permission for.
Technical detail
Contao's backend enforces per-table access control through a chain of Symfony security voters. The relevant one is
TableAccessVoter::hasAccessToModule(), in core-bundle/src/Security/Voter/DataContainer/TableAccessVoter.php:
private array $canAccessTable = [];
private array $canReadAccessTable = [];
private function hasAccessToModule(TokenInterface $token, ...): bool
{
$tokenHash = hash('xxh128', serialize($token));
if (isset($this->canAccessTable[$tokenHash]) || (...)) {
return $this->canAccessTable[$tokenHash] ?? $this->canReadAccessTable[$tokenHash];
}
$table = $subject->getDataSource();
foreach ($GLOBALS['BE_MOD'] as $modules) {
...
return $this->canAccessTable[$tokenHash] = true; // or false
}
}
The cache key, $tokenHash, is built only from the current user's security token. It does not include the table being checked. Because TableAccessVoter is a normal, shared Symfony service, this cache stays alive for the whole duration of one HTTP request. So the first table checked for a user in a request decides the cached answer for every other table checked afterwards in that same request, whether or not that answer is actually correct for the second table.
This is made worse by DefaultDataContainerVoter, a low-priority, permissive fallback voter that grants access to any table-related permission unless another voter explicitly denies it. When TableAccessVoter gives a wrong "no opinion" answer because of the stale cache, this fallback voter turns that into a full grant.
Most database tables in Contao have no second, table-specific check to catch this. Only tl_content, tl_favorites, tl_form, tl_form_field, tl_module, tl_image_size(_item), tl_job, tl_layout, tl_page, tl_preview_link, tl_undo, and tl_user have one. Tables such as tl_member (website member data), tl_newsletter_recipients (subscriber e-mail addresses), tl_news, tl_calendar_events, tl_faq, and tl_comments rely only on the defective check described above.
Credits
This security vulnerability was found by Sven Jäger of SySS GmbH.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | contao/core-bundle | ≥ 5.7.0&&< 5.7.12 | 5.7.12composer require contao/core-bundle:^5.7.12 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for contao/core-bundle, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update contao/core-bundle to 5.7.12 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-107851 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-107851 in your dependencies?
Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.