Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
LOW severity

CVE-2026-107848 — core-bundle

LOWFix: contao/contao@34dd27e

CVE-2026-107848 is a low-severity (CVSS 3.5) Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in contao/core-bundle. A fix is available for contao/core-bundle — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Contao: Cross-site request forgery in custom backend actions

Also known asGHSA-9ff2-p842-45wq
Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-107848.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs1th percentile — riskier than 1% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-107848 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐘contao/core-bundle🐘contao/core-bundle

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

RequestTokenListener is the only generic REQUEST_TOKEN validator in Contao and it only runs on POST. On the GET side the guard is local and declarative, and it only fires when an act parameter is present. Every back end action dispatched through a different parameter therefore has no CSRF protection at all. This is a family rather than a single bug.

Impact

An attacker who gets a logged in back end user to load a URL performs back end actions as that user, with no token and no confirmation. Because the exposure follows from the dispatch mechanism rather than from one callback, every present and future key= action inherits it.

Honest bound. The victim must be authenticated in the back end and must load the URL, and the reachable actions are limited to the modules that user can access. We have not found a key= action that grants privileges; the ones we verified are destructive or state changing rather than escalating.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistcontao/core-bundle≥ 4.0.0&&< 5.3.505.3.50composer require contao/core-bundle:^5.3.50
🐘Packagistcontao/core-bundle≥ 5.4.0-RC1&&< 5.7.125.7.12composer require contao/core-bundle:^5.7.12

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for contao/core-bundle, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update contao/core-bundle to 5.3.50 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-107848 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

`RequestTokenListener` is the only generic `REQUEST_TOKEN` validator in Contao and it only runs on POST. On the GET side the guard is local and declarative, and it only fires when an `act` parameter is present. Every back end action dispatched through a different parameter therefore has no CSRF protection at all. This is a family rather than a single bug. ### Impact An attacker who gets a logged in back end user to load a URL performs back end actions as that user, with no token and no confirmation. Because the exposure follows from the dispatch mechanism rather than from one callback, every
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-107848 in your dependencies?

Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-107848: core-bundle CSRF — Fixed in 5.3.50