Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-106510 — @backstage/plugin-techdoc…

HIGHFix: backstage/backstage@02cd7cd

CVE-2026-106510 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.7) CWE-183 vulnerability in @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node. A fix is available for @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Backstage: Remote code execution via crafted markdown_extensions in TechDocs mkdocs.yml

Also known asGHSA-4488-j8vj-vqqv
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-106510.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs38th percentile — riskier than 38% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-106510 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

10other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@backstage/plugin-techdocs-nodenpm
99Kdownloads / week

Description

Impact

An authenticated user who can register catalog entities can provide a crafted mkdocs.yml causing arbitrary OS command execution on the TechDocs build host when the docs are built.

Patches

Patched in @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node, version 1.15.4.

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately:

  • Switch to techdocs.builder: external to isolate TechDocs builds in a container.
  • Restrict who can register catalog entities with TechDocs annotations.
  • Audit existing catalog entities for suspicious markdown_extensions values in their mkdocs.yml files.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@backstage/plugin-techdocs-nodeall versions1.15.4npm install @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node@1.15.4

Affected Products

2 products · 9 configurations
Application
backstagelinuxfoundation
≥ 1.51.1 && < 1.54.6
1 version
1.51.0
Application
backstage plugin-techdocs-nodelinuxfoundation
≥ 1.15.0 && < 1.15.4
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node to 1.15.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-106510 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

This vulnerability is rated as Important because authenticated users permitted to register catalog entities can trigger arbitrary system commands on the backend build host. In Red Hat Developer Hub and Ansible Automation Platform environments utilizing in-tree TechDocs generation, an attacker can leverage malicious…

Workaround published by Red Hat
To mitigate this vulnerability, implement the following operational and configuration controls: 1. Isolate documentation builds: Configure TechDocs to delegate builds to an external pipeline rather than executing them locally on the portal host. In `app-config.yaml`, set: ```yaml techdocs: builder: 'external' ``` Warning: Applying configuration changes to `app-config.yaml` requires restarting or redeploying the service to take effect. Delegating to external builders requires generating documentation through external CI/CD pipelines or dedicated build runners. 2. Restrict catalog registration: Restrict catalog registration privileges to authorized administrators through role-based access…
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-106510 (CC BY 4.0)

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact An authenticated user who can register catalog entities can provide a crafted `mkdocs.yml` causing arbitrary OS command execution on the TechDocs build host when the docs are built. ### Patches Patched in `@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node`, version `1.15.4`. ### Workarounds If you cannot upgrade immediately: - Switch to `techdocs.builder: external` to isolate TechDocs builds in a container. - Restrict who can register catalog entities with TechDocs annotations. - Audit existing catalog entities for suspicious `markdown_extensions` values in their `mkdocs.yml` files.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-106510 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-106510: @backstage/plugin — Fixed in 1.15.4