NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2025-68478 — langflow

HIGH

CVE-2025-68478 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) CWE-73 vulnerability in langflow. A fix is available for langflow — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Langflow Vulnerable to External Control of File Name or Path

Also known asGHSA-f43r-cc68-gpx4PYSEC-2025-125
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 7, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-68478.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
5.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs93th percentile — riskier than 93% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%2.51%5.01%7.52%0.0%5.8%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍langflow

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Vulnerability Overview

If an arbitrary path is specified in the request body's fs_path, the server serializes the Flow object into JSON and creates/overwrites a file at that path. There is no path restriction, normalization, or allowed directory enforcement, so absolute paths (e.g., /etc/poc.txt) are interpreted as is.

Vulnerable Code

  1. It receives the request body (flow), updates the DB, and then passes it to the file-writing sink.

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/ac6e2d2eabeee28085f2739d79f7ce4205ca082c/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/flows.py#L154-L168

    @router.post("/", response_model=FlowRead, status_code=201)
    async def create_flow(
        *,
        session: DbSession,
        flow: FlowCreate,
        current_user: CurrentActiveUser,
    ):
        try:
            db_flow = await _new_flow(session=session, flow=flow, user_id=current_user.id)
            await session.commit()
            await session.refresh(db_flow)
    
            await _save_flow_to_fs(db_flow)
    
        except Exception as e:
    
  2. Applies authentication dependency (requires API Key/JWT) when accessing the endpoint.

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/ac6e2d2eabeee28085f2739d79f7ce4205ca082c/src/backend/base/langflow/api/utils/core.py#L36-L38

    CurrentActiveUser = Annotated[User, Depends(get_current_active_user)]
    CurrentActiveMCPUser = Annotated[User, Depends(get_current_active_user_mcp)]
    DbSession = Annotated[AsyncSession, Depends(get_session)]
    
  3. The client can directly specify the save path, including fs_path.

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/ac6e2d2eabeee28085f2739d79f7ce4205ca082c/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/flows.py#L66-L70

    ):
        try:
            await _verify_fs_path(flow.fs_path)
    
            """Create a new flow."""
    
  4. It attempts to create the file (or the file, in the case of a path without a parent) directly without path validation.

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/ac6e2d2eabeee28085f2739d79f7ce4205ca082c/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/flows.py#L45-L49

    async def _verify_fs_path(path: str | None) -> None:
        if path:
            path_ = Path(path)
            if not await path_.exists():
                await path_.touch()
    
  5. Serializes the Flow object to JSON and writes it to the specified path in "w" mode (overwriting).

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/ac6e2d2eabeee28085f2739d79f7ce4205ca082c/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/flows.py#L52-L58

    async def _save_flow_to_fs(flow: Flow) -> None:
        if flow.fs_path:
            async with async_open(flow.fs_path, "w") as f:
                try:
                    await f.write(flow.model_dump_json())
                except OSError:
                    await logger.aexception("Failed to write flow %s to path %s", flow.name, flow.fs_path)
    

PoC Description

When an authenticated user passes an arbitrary path in fs_path, the Flow JSON is written to that path. Since /tmp is usually writable, it is easy to reproduce. In a production environment, writing to system-protected directories may fail depending on permissions.

PoC

  • Before Exploit

    <img width="1918" height="658" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fe3c2306-091d-4cb0-b4dc-c7fb63c03d8d" />
  • After Exploit

    curl -sS -X POST "http://localhost:7860/api/v1/flows/" \
      -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
      -H "x-api-key: sk-8Kyzf9IQ-UEJ_OtSTaJq4eniMT9_JKgZ7__q8PNkoxc" \
      -d '{"name":"poc-etc","data":{"nodes":[],"edges":[]},"fs_path":"/tmp/POC.txt"}'
    
    <img width="1918" height="742" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cc0b0c96-1c2d-4d56-b558-5ba97e0ec174" />

Impact

  • Authenticated Arbitrary File Write (within server permission scope): Risk of corrupting configuration/log/task files, disrupting application behavior, and tampering with files read by other components.
  • Both absolute and relative paths are allowed, enabling base directory traversal. The risk of overwriting system files increases in environments with root privileges or weak mount/permission settings.
  • The file content is limited to Flow JSON, but the impact is severe if the target file is parsed by a JSON parser or is subject to subsequent processing.
  • In production environments, it is essential to enforce a save root, normalize paths, block symlink traversal, and minimize permissions.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIlangflowall versions1.7.1pip install --upgrade 'langflow==1.7.1'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
langflowlangflow
< 1.7.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langflow, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update langflow to 1.7.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-68478 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.

Frequently Asked Questions

**Vulnerability Overview** If an arbitrary path is specified in the request body's `fs_path`, the server serializes the Flow object into JSON and creates/overwrites a file at that path. There is no path restriction, normalization, or allowed directory enforcement, so absolute paths (e.g., /etc/poc.txt) are interpreted as is. **Vulnerable Code** 1. It receives the request body (flow), updates the DB, and then passes it to the file-writing sink. https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/ac6e2d2eabeee28085f2739d79f7ce4205ca082c/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/flows.py#L154-L168
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2025-68478 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2025-68478: langflow Path Traversal — Fixed in 1.7.1