CVE-2025-68478 — langflow
HIGHCVE-2025-68478 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) CWE-73 vulnerability in langflow. A fix is available for langflow — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Langflow Vulnerable to External Control of File Name or Path
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-68478.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
langflowReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Vulnerability Overview
If an arbitrary path is specified in the request body's fs_path, the server serializes the Flow object into JSON and creates/overwrites a file at that path. There is no path restriction, normalization, or allowed directory enforcement, so absolute paths (e.g., /etc/poc.txt) are interpreted as is.
Vulnerable Code
-
It receives the request body (flow), updates the DB, and then passes it to the file-writing sink.
@router.post("/", response_model=FlowRead, status_code=201) async def create_flow( *, session: DbSession, flow: FlowCreate, current_user: CurrentActiveUser, ): try: db_flow = await _new_flow(session=session, flow=flow, user_id=current_user.id) await session.commit() await session.refresh(db_flow) await _save_flow_to_fs(db_flow) except Exception as e: -
Applies authentication dependency (requires API Key/JWT) when accessing the endpoint.
CurrentActiveUser = Annotated[User, Depends(get_current_active_user)] CurrentActiveMCPUser = Annotated[User, Depends(get_current_active_user_mcp)] DbSession = Annotated[AsyncSession, Depends(get_session)] -
The client can directly specify the save path, including
fs_path.): try: await _verify_fs_path(flow.fs_path) """Create a new flow.""" -
It attempts to create the file (or the file, in the case of a path without a parent) directly without path validation.
async def _verify_fs_path(path: str | None) -> None: if path: path_ = Path(path) if not await path_.exists(): await path_.touch() -
Serializes the Flow object to JSON and writes it to the specified path in "w" mode (overwriting).
async def _save_flow_to_fs(flow: Flow) -> None: if flow.fs_path: async with async_open(flow.fs_path, "w") as f: try: await f.write(flow.model_dump_json()) except OSError: await logger.aexception("Failed to write flow %s to path %s", flow.name, flow.fs_path)
PoC Description
When an authenticated user passes an arbitrary path in fs_path, the Flow JSON is written to that path. Since /tmp is usually writable, it is easy to reproduce. In a production environment, writing to system-protected directories may fail depending on permissions.
PoC
-
Before Exploit
<img width="1918" height="658" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fe3c2306-091d-4cb0-b4dc-c7fb63c03d8d" /> -
After Exploit
<img width="1918" height="742" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cc0b0c96-1c2d-4d56-b558-5ba97e0ec174" />curl -sS -X POST "http://localhost:7860/api/v1/flows/" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -H "x-api-key: sk-8Kyzf9IQ-UEJ_OtSTaJq4eniMT9_JKgZ7__q8PNkoxc" \ -d '{"name":"poc-etc","data":{"nodes":[],"edges":[]},"fs_path":"/tmp/POC.txt"}'
Impact
- Authenticated Arbitrary File Write (within server permission scope): Risk of corrupting configuration/log/task files, disrupting application behavior, and tampering with files read by other components.
- Both absolute and relative paths are allowed, enabling base directory traversal. The risk of overwriting system files increases in environments with root privileges or weak mount/permission settings.
- The file content is limited to Flow JSON, but the impact is severe if the target file is parsed by a JSON parser or is subject to subsequent processing.
- In production environments, it is essential to enforce a save root, normalize paths, block symlink traversal, and minimize permissions.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | langflow | all versions | 1.7.1pip install --upgrade 'langflow==1.7.1' |
Affected Products
langflowlangflowDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langflow, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update langflow to 1.7.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-68478 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-68478 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.