CVE-2025-62610 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) CWE-285 vulnerability in hono. A fix is available for hono — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Hono Improperly Authorizes JWT Audience Validation
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-62610.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2025-62610 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
hononpmDescription
Improper Authorization in Hono (JWT Audience Validation)
Hono’s JWT authentication middleware did not validate the aud (Audience) claim by default. As a result, applications using the middleware without an explicit audience check could accept tokens intended for other audiences, leading to potential cross-service access (token mix-up).
The issue is addressed by adding a new verification.aud configuration option to allow RFC 7519–compliant audience validation. This change is classified as a security hardening improvement, but the lack of validation can still be considered a vulnerability in deployments that rely on default JWT verification.
Recommended secure configuration
You can enable RFC 7519–compliant audience validation using the new verification.aud option:
import { Hono } from 'hono'
import { jwt } from 'hono/jwt'
const app = new Hono()
app.use(
'/api/*',
jwt({
secret: 'my-secret',
verification: {
// Require this API to only accept tokens with aud = 'service-a'
aud: 'service-a',
},
})
)
Below is the original description by the reporter. For security reasons, it does not include PoC reproduction steps, as the vulnerability can be clearly understood from the technical description.
The original description by the reporter
Summary
Hono’s JWT Auth Middleware does not provide a built-in aud (Audience) verification option, which can cause confused-deputy / token-mix-up issues: an API may accept a valid token that was issued for a different audience (e.g., another service) when multiple services share the same issuer/keys. This can lead to unintended cross-service access. Hono’s docs list verification options for iss/nbf/iat/exp only, with no aud support; RFC 7519 requires that when an aud claim is present, tokens MUST be rejected unless the processing party identifies itself in that claim.
Note: This problem likely exists in the JWK/JWKS-based middleware as well (e.g., jwk / verifyWithJwks)
Details
- The middleware’s
verifyOptionsenumerate onlyiss,nbf,iat, andexp; there is noaudoption. The same omission appears in the JWT Helper’s “Payload Validation” list. Developers relying on the middleware for complete standards-aligned validation therefore won’t check audience by default. - Standards requirement: RFC 7519 §4.1.3 states that each principal intended to process the JWT MUST identify itself with a value in the
audclaim; if it does not, the JWT MUST be rejected (whenaudis present). Lack of a first-classaudcheck increases the risk that tokens issued for Service B are accepted by Service A. - Real-world effect: In deployments with a single IdP/JWKS and shared keys across multiple services, a token minted for one audience can be mistakenly accepted by another audience unless developers implement a custom audience check.
- For example, with Google Identity (OIDC), iss is always https://accounts.google.com (shared across apps), but aud differs per application because it is that app’s OAuth client ID; therefore, an attacker can host a separate service that supports “Sign in with Google,” obtain a valid ID token (JWT) for the victim user, and—if your API does not verify aud—use that token to access your API with the victim’s privileges.
Impact
Type: Authentication/authorization weakness via token mix-up (confused-deputy).
Who is impacted: Any Hono user who:
- shares an issuer/keys across multiple services (common with a single IdP/JWKS)
- distinguishes tokens by intended recipient using
aud.
What can happen:
- Cross-service access: A token for Service B may be accepted by Service A.
- Boundary erosion: ID tokens and access tokens, or separate API audiences, can be inadvertently intermixed.
- This may causes unauthorized invocation of sensitive endpoints.
Recommended remediation:
- Add
verifyOptions.aud(string | string[] | RegExp) to the middleware and enforce RFC 7519 semantics: In verify method, ifaudis present and does not match with specified audiences, reject. - Ensure equivalent
audhandling exists in the JWK/JWKS flow (jwkmiddleware /verifyWithJwks) so users of external IdPs can enforce audience consistently.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | hono | ≥ 1.1.0&&< 4.10.2 | 4.10.2npm install hono@4.10.2 |
Affected Products
honohonoDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for hono, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update hono to 4.10.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-62610 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-62610 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.