How severe is CVE-2025-55001?

CVE-2025-55001 has a CVSS score of 6.5/10, rated MEDIUM. Review your exposure and patch according to your risk tolerance.

Which packages are affected by CVE-2025-55001?

CVE-2025-55001 affects the following packages: github.com/openbao/openbao (Go), github.com/openbao/openbao (Go). Ecosystems affected: Go.

How do I fix CVE-2025-55001?

Update github.com/openbao/openbao to 2.3.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-55001 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect CVE-2025-55001 in my Go dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/openbao/openbao, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate CVE-2025-55001 if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Is CVE-2025-55001 actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for CVE-2025-55001 yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for CVE-2025-55001?

CVE-2025-55001 has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.2%, placing it in the 16th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is CVE-2025-55001?

CVE-2025-55001 is classified as CWE-156 (CWE-156). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was CVE-2025-55001 published, and has it been updated?

CVE-2025-55001 was published on August 9, 2025 and was last updated on October 28, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🐹

🐹 Go

Not in CISA KEV

MEDIUM severity

CVE-2025-55001 — openbao

MEDIUMFix: openbao/openbao@c52795c

CVE-2025-55001 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) CWE-156 vulnerability in github.com/openbao/openbao. A fix is available for github.com/openbao/openbao — see the affected versions and patch details below.

OpenBao LDAP MFA Enforcement Bypass When Using Username As Alias

Also known asBIT-openbao-2025-55001GHSA-2q8q-8fgw-9p6pGO-2025-3859

Published

Aug 9, 2025

Updated

Oct 28, 2026

Affected

2 pkgs

Patched

2 / 2

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Nov 5, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-55001.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk0.00%

Lower risk than most CVEs16th percentile — riskier than 16% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

🐹github.com/openbao/openbao🐹github.com/openbao/openbao

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

OpenBao allows assignment of policies and MFA attribution based upon entity aliases, chosen by the underlying auth method. When using the username_as_alias=true parameter in the LDAP auth method, the caller-supplied username is used verbatim without normalization, allowing an attacker to bypass alias-specific MFA requirements.

Patches

OpenBao v2.3.2 will patch this issue.

Workarounds

LDAP methods are only vulnerable if using username_as_alias=true. Remove all usage of this parameter and update any entity aliases accordingly.

References

This issue was disclosed to HashiCorp and is the OpenBao equivalent of the following tickets:

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐹Go	`github.com/openbao/openbao`	≥ 0.1.0&&< 2.3.2	2.3.2`go get github.com/openbao/openbao@v2.3.2`
🐹Go	`github.com/openbao/openbao`	all versions	0.0.0-20250807212521-c52795c1ef74`go get github.com/openbao/openbao@v0.0.0-20250807212521-c52795c1ef74`

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations

Application

openbaoopenbao

< 2.3.2

range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/openbao/openbao, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/openbao/openbao to 2.3.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-55001 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact OpenBao allows assignment of policies and MFA attribution based upon entity aliases, chosen by the underlying auth method. When using the `username_as_alias=true` parameter in the LDAP auth method, the caller-supplied username is used verbatim without normalization, allowing an attacker to bypass alias-specific MFA requirements. ### Patches OpenBao v2.3.2 will patch this issue. ### Workarounds LDAP methods are only vulnerable if using `username_as_alias=true`. Remove all usage of this parameter and update any entity aliases accordingly. ### References This issue was disclosed