NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2025-48074 — openexr

Fix: AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr@2df7802

CVE-2025-48074 is a CWE-770 vulnerability in openexr. A fix is available for openexr — see the affected versions and patch details below.

OpenEXR's Unbounded File Header Values can Lead to Out-Of-Memory Errors

Also known asGHSA-x22w-82jp-8rvfPYSEC-2026-1749
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 4, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-48074.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk+0.02%
Lower risk than most CVEs22th percentile — riskier than 22% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.27%0.53%0.80%0.0%0.3%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍openexr

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The OpenEXR file format defines many information about the final image inside of the file header, such as the size of data/display window.

The application trusts the value of dataWindow size provided in the header of the input file, and performs computations based on this value.

This may result in unintended behaviors, such as excessively large number of iterations and/or huge memory allocations.

Details

A concrete example of this issue is present in the function readScanline() in ImfCheckFile.cpp at line 235, that performs a for-loop using the dataWindow min.y and max.y coordinates that can be arbitrarily large.

in.setFrameBuffer (i);

int step = 1;

//
// try reading scanlines. Continue reading scanlines
// even if an exception is encountered
//
for (int y = dw.min.y; y <= dw.max.y; y += step) // <-- THIS LOOP IS EXCESSIVE BECAUSE OF DW.MAX
{
    try
    {
        in.readPixels (y);
    }
    catch (...)
    {
        threw = true;

        //
        // in reduceTime mode, fail immediately - the file is corrupt
        //
        if (reduceTime) { return threw; }
    }
}

Another example occurs in the EnvmapImage::resize function that in turn calls Array2D<T>::resizeEraseUnsafe passing the dataWindow X and Y coordinates and perform a huge allocation.

On some system, the allocator will simply return std::bad_alloc and crash. On other systems such as macOS, the allocator will happily continue with a "small" pre-allocation and allocate further memory whenever it is accessed. This is the case with the EnvmapImage::clear function that is called right after and fills the image RGB values with zeros, allocating tens of Gigabytes.

PoC

NOTE: please download the oom_crash.exr file via the following link:

https://github.com/ShielderSec/poc/tree/main/CVE-2025-48074

  1. Compile the exrcheck binary in a macOS or GNU/Linux machine with ASAN.
  2. Open the oom_crash.exr file with the following command:
exrcheck oom_crash.exr
  1. Notice that exrenvmap/exrcheck crashes with ASAN stack-trace.

Impact

An attacker could cause a denial of service by stalling the application or exhaust memory by stalling the application in a loop which contains a memory leakage.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIopenexr≥ 3.3.2&&< 3.3.33.3.3pip install --upgrade 'openexr==3.3.3'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
openexropenexr
1 version
3.3.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openexr, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update openexr to 3.3.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-48074 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatLow
Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2025-48074 (CC BY 4.0)

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The OpenEXR file format defines many information about the final image inside of the file header, such as the size of data/display window. The application trusts the value of `dataWindow` size provided in the header of the input file, and performs computations based on this value. This may result in unintended behaviors, such as excessively large number of iterations and/or huge memory allocations. ### Details A concrete example of this issue is present in the function `readScanline()` in `ImfCheckFile.cpp` at line 235, that performs a for-loop using the `dataWindow min.y` and
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2025-48074 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2025-48074: openexr DoS — Fixed in 3.3.3