Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2025-47241 browser-use

MEDIUMFix: browser-use/browser-use#1561

CVE-2025-47241 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4) CWE-647 vulnerability in browser-use. A fix is available for browser-use — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Browser Use allows bypassing `allowed_domains` by putting a decoy domain in http auth username portion of a URL

Also known asGHSA-x39x-9qw5-ghrfPYSEC-2026-300
Published
May 3, 2025
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-47241.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs39th percentile — riskier than 39% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2025-47241 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍browser-use

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

During a manual source code review, ARIMLABS.AI researchers identified that the browser_use module includes an embedded whitelist functionality to restrict URLs that can be visited. This restriction is enforced during agent initialization. However, it was discovered that these measures can be bypassed, leading to severe security implications.

Details

File: browser_use/browser/context.py

The BrowserContextConfig class defines an allowed_domains list, which is intended to limit accessible domains. This list is checked in the _is_url_allowed() method before navigation:

@dataclass
class BrowserContextConfig:
    """
    [STRIPPED]
    """
    cookies_file: str | None = None
    minimum_wait_page_load_time: float = 0.5
    wait_for_network_idle_page_load_time: float = 1
    maximum_wait_page_load_time: float = 5
    wait_between_actions: float = 1

    disable_security: bool = True

    browser_window_size: BrowserContextWindowSize = field(default_factory=lambda: {'width': 1280, 'height': 1100})
    no_viewport: Optional[bool] = None

    save_recording_path: str | None = None
    save_downloads_path: str | None = None
    trace_path: str | None = None
    locale: str | None = None
    user_agent: str = (
        'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/85.0.4183.102 Safari/537.36'
    )

    highlight_elements: bool = True
    viewport_expansion: int = 500
    allowed_domains: list[str] | None = None
    include_dynamic_attributes: bool = True

    _force_keep_context_alive: bool = False

The _is_url_allowed() method is responsible for checking whether a given URL is permitted:

def _is_url_allowed(self, url: str) -> bool:
    """Check if a URL is allowed based on the whitelist configuration."""
    if not self.config.allowed_domains:
        return True

    try:
        from urllib.parse import urlparse

        parsed_url = urlparse(url)
        domain = parsed_url.netloc.lower()

        # Remove port number if present
        if ':' in domain:
            domain = domain.split(':')[0]

        # Check if domain matches any allowed domain pattern
        return any(
            domain == allowed_domain.lower() or domain.endswith('.' + allowed_domain.lower())
            for allowed_domain in self.config.allowed_domains
        )
    except Exception as e:
        logger.error(f'Error checking URL allowlist: {str(e)}')
        return False

The core issue stems from the line domain = domain.split(':')[0], which allows an attacker to manipulate basic authentication credentials by providing a username:password pair. By replacing the username with a whitelisted domain, the check can be bypassed, even though the actual domain remains different.

Proof of Concept (PoC)

Set allowed_domains to ['example.com'] and use the following URL:

https://example.com:pass@localhost:8080

This allows bypassing all whitelist controls and accessing restricted internal services.

Impact

  • Affected all users relying on this functionality for security.
  • Potential for unauthorized enumeration of localhost services and internal networks.
  • Ability to bypass domain whitelisting, leading to unauthorized browsing.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIbrowser-useall versions0.1.45pip install --upgrade 'browser-use==0.1.45'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for browser-use, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update browser-use to 0.1.45 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-47241 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-47241 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2025-47241. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary During a manual source code review, [**ARIMLABS.AI**](https://arimlabs.ai) researchers identified that the `browser_use` module includes an embedded whitelist functionality to restrict URLs that can be visited. This restriction is enforced during agent initialization. However, it was discovered that these measures can be bypassed, leading to severe security implications. ### Details **File:** `browser_use/browser/context.py` The `BrowserContextConfig` class defines an `allowed_domains` list, which is intended to limit accessible domains. This list is checked in the `_is_u
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2025-47241 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2025-47241 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2025-47241: browser-use (Medium 4) | O3 Security